| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
some waygug-in
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
From my own experience in studying Korean and trying to practice my writing skills in Korean I have seen the same phenomenon.
I was making the same mistakes over and over, and the reason was I would forget about the correction made in past writing assignments and thus make the same error over and over.
My teacher noticed this and she made me re-write every assignment, but with all the corrections made. This did seem to help me to remember how to make correct sentences.
Another solution would be to have the student practice making similar sentences that use the same form as the one they are having problems with.
The dog was big and scary.
The cow was old and feeble.
The cat was quick and agile.
etc.
I think the problem in Korea is that most if not all students are pushed ahead far too quickly. They still can't even make a sentence using present simple, but are asked to hand in two page writing assignments.
It is ridiculous.
One thing that always seems to be neglected is practice making different kinds of sentences and then recognizing the differences in meaning.
Declarative: I am simply the biggest fool on the planet.
Interrogative: Are you the biggest fool on the planet?
Emphatic: I most certainly am the biggest fool on the planet!
Negative: No you aren't the biggest fool on the planet, I am!
etc.
Feel free to correct my sentence classification errors.
One thing that teachers here seem to do far too much of is to have students who can't make a sentence start doing grammatical analysis.
Sub - verb - obj.
etc. and then have the students start memorizing gammatical terms.
Not that there isn't a time and place for that kind of thing, but I feel that it isn't the most helpful until the student has gained at least an intermediate level of proficiency. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh Inal Ovar

Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 1208 Location: Melo Drama School
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's baffling why students are allowed to take a foreign language* when they can't be bothered to look at their own native language for ten minutes to get to grips with basic concepts like 'subject and verb' ... and word forms ...
You don't look for a light on Mars ... you take one with you
* non-fee paying courses of course .. otherwise it's not in the slightest bit baffling |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sallycat
Joined: 11 Mar 2006 Posts: 303 Location: behind you. BOO!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| tedkarma wrote: |
| shyarra wrote: |
| what this second exercise does is give those students confidence in their ability to write. |
The problem in much of Asia is that the students already "believe" they can write - and as a result are quite happy (and proud!) to write pages and pages and pages of non-sensical gibberish. Back to basics for them! |
my favourite ever piece of gobbledygook was a note from a student who missed a class. it read "i am sorry to have been unable to mistake time and to have come out by the thing of yesterday's class". makes almost perfect sense if you translate it word for word into japanese.
anyway, i think the article posted has immense relevance, not just for the teaching of written english, but also of spoken english. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
when they can't be bothered to look at their own native language for ten minutes to get to grips with basic concepts like 'subject and verb' ... and word forms ...
|
Actually, it is quite possible that the concepts are quite different in their own language. May I suggest you look carefully at a book called Learner English before you start making wild claims about your students not understanding concepts that you learnt in High School that may well not apply to their language. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh Inal Ovar

Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 1208 Location: Melo Drama School
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stephen Jones wrote: |
| May I suggest you look carefully at a book called Learner English before you start making wild claims about your students not understanding concepts that you learnt in High School that may well not apply to their language. |
It is not difficult to find in Turkish and Arabic sentences that have easily recognisable equivalents of what we call subject and verb ... and they have their equivalents of our word forms ... as the more successful students in the classes have often pointed out to their foundering classmates ...
... we're not talking about the deeper analysis of psychological, grammatical, and logical subject etc ... we're talking about basics ... a starting point at which one can feel a little less helpless and lost and from which one can start to drive one's own understanding and development ....
Do you not think it would benefit students' writing if they knew, for example, the functional difference between a noun, a verb and an adjective before embarking on their course?
I will take a look at the book ... thankyou ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, here's a fine example.
Korean doesn't call adjectives an equivalent of what we call them.
In Korean, adjectives are called "descriptive verbs" and then you get all this wonderful confusion happening about the difference between verbs and adjectives.
That's why I say it's better just to leave the grammatical terms out of things until after they have mastered some basics.
It's far better to have them write sentences describing a picture and understand the meaning of what they are writing, than to have them worry about "is this a noun?" is this a verb?" etc.
I have had quite a few adult students who could piece together a passable sentence by just stringing together grammar terms.
They could tell me the grammatical name of each word, but they still couldn't understand the meaning of what they had written. What is the use of that?
I'm not saying they shouldn't study grammar, just that they should wait until after they can at least write a passable paragraph or two. (and more importantly, that their spoken English is at sufficient enough to be able to understand the explanations of grammatical terms) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sheikh Inal Ovar

Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 1208 Location: Melo Drama School
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Korean doesn't call adjectives an equivalent of what we call them.
In Korean, adjectives are called "descriptive verbs" |
We're talking about the function of the word ... it doesn't matter what its name is ... your comment above implies that the function of descriptive verbs (which I hope is a literal translation) is the same as that of adjectives ...
... and who said anything about their having to learn the English names for them ... and point out which is which .. we haven't got anywhere near that ...
... I've only talked about students being aware of some of the basic functions that exist within (their own) language ... this conscious knowledge is the knowledge that would help them with their analysis of the foreign language ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK. I understand what you are getting at. If they can't do a grammatical analysis of their own language and its structure, it is pointless to try and do one of a second language.
It's just that I see students and teachers get so hung up on grammar that they never learn the meaning of words....let alone sentences. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many already mentioned this, but what really freaks me out is how often students invent English. My advice to them is to keep their sentences short and simple. "And remember, if you don't understand what you are writing, you guarantee I don't either."
Last edited by Deconstructor on Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:52 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wish I had a few students that had attained even a pre-intermediate level.
Most of the students I teach are still learning phonics and the basics of spelling 3 - 5 letter words.
Nothing really works with students who don't want to learn, and that is the biggest problem I face.
I can play games with them, bring in pop songs, try to find interesting activities for them, try and "edutain" them a bit, but I can not make them want to learn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamish

Joined: 20 Mar 2003 Posts: 333 Location: PRC
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
With all due respect, I think vast portions of our laboring over teaching methods are balderdash, pure and simple.
IMHO
We learn to cook by eating.
We learn to write by reading.
We learn to speak by listening.
Classroom lectures have little to do with the process beyond encouragement and support, both of which are crucial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hamish wrote: |
With all due respect, I think vast portions of our laboring over teaching methods are balderdash, pure and simple.
IMHO
We learn to cook by eating.
We learn to write by reading.
We learn to speak by listening.
Classroom lectures have little to do with the process beyond encouragement and support, both of which are crucial. |
Finally!!!! Someone who thinks like me!!!!
You want to learn another language, here's what you do: Establish a base for a few months: some grammar, some vocab. After that spend all your time reading, listening and speaking. The very idea of the language classroom beyond the basics is bull. In fact, even for the basics you don't need to be in a classroom. All you gotta do is buy a grammar book and a dictionary. The EFL/ESL classroom is the biggest scam in the world, so let's profit before they're on to us. On the other hand, language students are too stupid to ever catch on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Atassi
Joined: 13 Sep 2004 Posts: 128 Location: 평택
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
The EFL/ESL classroom is the biggest scam in the world, so let's profit before they're on to us. On the other hand, language students are too stupid to ever catch on.
|
Deconstructor, I don't think Hamish meant anything like this. The biggest scam in the world? The only way it's a scam is if the teacher allows it to be. If the teacher allows the class to be a waste of time, then teaching methods need to be looked at. Any level learner can attend a good class without it being any sort of "scam".
I'm not trying to pick at your post, but if you were at all serious by your statement you asked for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheLongWayHome

Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 1016 Location: San Luis Piojosi
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Atassi wrote: |
| Deconstructor, I don't think Hamish meant anything like this. The biggest scam in the world? The only way it's a scam is if the teacher allows it to be. |
The trouble is, schools continue to flog the idea that you can be bilingual in one year/18 months/insert ridiculous claim, whilst learning English in a non-English speaking country. This is the scam, and we as teachers peddle it, knowingly or unknowingly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Atassi wrote: |
| Quote: |
The EFL/ESL classroom is the biggest scam in the world, so let's profit before they're on to us. On the other hand, language students are too stupid to ever catch on.
|
Deconstructor, I don't think Hamish meant anything like this. The biggest scam in the world? The only way it's a scam is if the teacher allows it to be. If the teacher allows the class to be a waste of time, then teaching methods need to be looked at. Any level learner can attend a good class without it being any sort of "scam".
I'm not trying to pick at your post, but if you were at all serious by your statement you asked for it. |
No offence is taken. I believe that ESL industry is a scam because it does not employ the right methodology to teach. Students want easy answers and we peddle them. We use trite texts and teach in filtered classes where they listen to absurd listening materials and barely read a paragraph. I have advanced students who can't get through a simple paragraph. I have beginner students who have been studying English for a decade. This is not how one learns/teaches a language.
Get your grammar book and dictionary. This is where everything starts and stops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|