Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Languages rated by difficulty for native English speakers
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So supposedly german is easy to learn?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

naturegirl321 wrote:
So supposedly german is easy to learn?


It depends what language family you're coming from. For an English speaker, Roman(ce) languages and Germanic would be (relatively) the easiest. Slavic languages would be more difficult and Asian languages would be evn more difficult.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jammish



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 1704

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I definitely say Chinese has to be one of the hardest. I have been here 3 and a half years and am just getting comfortable. It's also not an easy thing to 'just pick up', you have to really sit down and study it, which isn't easy when you're also teaching etc. Plus China has so many zillions of dialects that that makes it even harder.

And then there's the script on top of that!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GF



Joined: 08 Jun 2003
Posts: 238
Location: Tallinn

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If anyone wants a real challenge, then he or she should try Estonian. Even the natives make lots of mistakes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jizzo T. Clown



Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 668
Location: performing in a classroom near you!

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GF wrote:
Even the natives make lots of mistakes.


Sounds alot like English, don't it? Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freelancer



Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The hardest language is Chinese.
Reason 1: Thousands of characters must be memorized (and must pick one of two kinds: traditional or simplified, both of which are still used depending on the country or place).
Reason 2: Tonal language, has 4 (or 5, if including unstressed) tones. Each tone imparts a different meaning on the same basic sound. Quite a bit different from the use of tones in English. It's easy to mistake or miss the differences in tones, if one doesn't listen carefully.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
movinaround



Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 202

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

freelancer wrote:
The hardest language is Chinese.
Reason 1: Thousands of characters must be memorized (and must pick one of two kinds: traditional or simplified, both of which are still used depending on the country or place).
Reason 2: Tonal language, has 4 (or 5, if including unstressed) tones. Each tone imparts a different meaning on the same basic sound. Quite a bit different from the use of tones in English. It's easy to mistake or miss the differences in tones, if one doesn't listen carefully.


I think it's more of opinion that everyone on this thread is giving than facts. I found Chinese pretty easy to learn, especially as the pronunciation never changes once you get it down. 'zhou' will always be pronunced 'zhou'. And if it's the first tone, it will always be pronunced in the same way. Unlike English where there are still words I come across that I can't sometimes pronounce (soft or hard 'g'??) Wink And Japanese Kanji can have between 1 and 8 (maybe more, I only know of one Kanji having 8 readings between kun and on) readings to memorize, unlike Chinese, which almost always has only one reading to memorize. The grammar is also pretty basic and logical (in a way). This is just my opinion ofcourse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deconstructor



Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Posts: 775
Location: Montreal

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The very idea that one language is more difficult than another is a myth! How does one compare two languages? More specifically, what aspects of a given language does one compare? Are we talking about grammar? If that's the case, then all languages have complexities within their structures. Is the simple past in English more complex than that in French? If so, for whom and why?

Or are we talking about syntax? In French one says I YOU LOVE. Does this make it more complex than English I LOVE YOU? Perhaps only for the English and the French who are trying to learn each other's languages but not for, say, an Armenian whose language possesses both structures.

Again, it is always difficult to deal with how foreign languages construct the world, order it and express it. They all see the universe differently.

The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague that discussing it is profound waste of time.

I would argue that all languages are equally difficult to learn. All demand time, motivation, intelligence and talent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ls650



Joined: 10 May 2003
Posts: 3484
Location: British Columbia

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deconstructor wrote:
The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague
But the statement A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN B FOR A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER is not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shaman



Joined: 06 Apr 2003
Posts: 446
Location: Hammertown

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Swedish is a fun one. I've become better at grasping the gist of a conversation, but when it comes my turn to speak things can be interesting.

The "sj" (aspirate) isn't too bad. The arbitrary sound of "k" - the familar plosive vs. "sh" - can be annoying.

"Does this bus go to Kista?"

"You mean Sheesta?"

I'm better with a dictionary now too. I hadn't been aware of the spelling rules regarding the new vowels: �, �, �.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deconstructor



Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Posts: 775
Location: Montreal

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ls650 wrote:
Deconstructor wrote:
The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague
But the statement A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN B FOR A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER is not.


Yours is equally vague. You're suggesting that all Anglophones would find a given language difficult to learn while some other nationality wouldn't. If so, where is the research baking up such hypothesis?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deconstructor wrote:
ls650 wrote:
Deconstructor wrote:
The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague
But the statement A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN B FOR A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER is not.


Yours is equally vague. You're suggesting that all Anglophones would find a given language difficult to learn while some other nationality wouldn't. If so, where is the research baking up such hypothesis?


I would agree that ls650 made the statement rather categorically (ie, he was generalizing). Generalizing is appropriate when talking about a class or category as a whole (acknowledging that there are exceptions to the rule should be unnecessary), although it is good to remember/remind folks that you are speaking in general.

But requiring research to back up his statement denies the validity of logical inference. There are an awful lot of things we accept as truths without requiring research to back them up. One example of this is something you have experienced as true throughout your life (for example, stating that a clear majority of overseas TEFLers are male, and that there are good reasons for this).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wildnfree



Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 134

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am a fluent Chinese speaker although Im not Chinese. Not any old Chinese, but Cantonese, which has 9 tones per sound and maintains many characteristics of ancient (therefore more complicated) Chinese languages.

Unfortunately, I have become too fluent in it and draw stares where ever I go. I consider myself fluent after maybe 1.5 years of living in Hong Kong. On the phone, people consider me a native speaker. I disagree that is hard. The grammar is so simple it is baby-like and I never learnt to read formally but can read Chinese well. It just happened as I paid attention to the words in signs, asked people how they were pronunced and remembered them.

I also have a good ear for tones and accents...after learning Spanish for a few months, I was mistaken for a Spaniard but most native speakers!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ls650



Joined: 10 May 2003
Posts: 3484
Location: British Columbia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wildnfree wrote:
I also have a good ear for tones and accents...after learning Spanish for a few months, I was mistaken for a Spaniard but most native speakers!
Wow! That's definitely not typical ability for most people, though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abusalam4



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 143

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:42 pm    Post subject: Difficult? Reply with quote

Which language is the most difficult to learn for a native English speaker?
The question is relative, e.g.

Is Chinese? - It has no conjugation and declension system, and so in terns of grammar should be quite easy. There are difficulties to master pronunciation because of tonal system not known in English, and about writing we know of the thousands of characters that have to learned.

Is Arabic? - Yes, grammar, writing system and pronunciation present special challenges for the learner to master.

Etc.. etc.


The point I am trying to make is that thew question, in order to really answer it, must be in much more precise form.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China