| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So supposedly german is easy to learn? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| naturegirl321 wrote: |
| So supposedly german is easy to learn? |
It depends what language family you're coming from. For an English speaker, Roman(ce) languages and Germanic would be (relatively) the easiest. Slavic languages would be more difficult and Asian languages would be evn more difficult. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jammish

Joined: 17 Nov 2005 Posts: 1704
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely say Chinese has to be one of the hardest. I have been here 3 and a half years and am just getting comfortable. It's also not an easy thing to 'just pick up', you have to really sit down and study it, which isn't easy when you're also teaching etc. Plus China has so many zillions of dialects that that makes it even harder.
And then there's the script on top of that!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GF
Joined: 08 Jun 2003 Posts: 238 Location: Tallinn
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If anyone wants a real challenge, then he or she should try Estonian. Even the natives make lots of mistakes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jizzo T. Clown

Joined: 28 Apr 2005 Posts: 668 Location: performing in a classroom near you!
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| GF wrote: |
| Even the natives make lots of mistakes. |
Sounds alot like English, don't it?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
freelancer
Joined: 29 Jan 2007 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
The hardest language is Chinese.
Reason 1: Thousands of characters must be memorized (and must pick one of two kinds: traditional or simplified, both of which are still used depending on the country or place).
Reason 2: Tonal language, has 4 (or 5, if including unstressed) tones. Each tone imparts a different meaning on the same basic sound. Quite a bit different from the use of tones in English. It's easy to mistake or miss the differences in tones, if one doesn't listen carefully. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
movinaround
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| freelancer wrote: |
The hardest language is Chinese.
Reason 1: Thousands of characters must be memorized (and must pick one of two kinds: traditional or simplified, both of which are still used depending on the country or place).
Reason 2: Tonal language, has 4 (or 5, if including unstressed) tones. Each tone imparts a different meaning on the same basic sound. Quite a bit different from the use of tones in English. It's easy to mistake or miss the differences in tones, if one doesn't listen carefully. |
I think it's more of opinion that everyone on this thread is giving than facts. I found Chinese pretty easy to learn, especially as the pronunciation never changes once you get it down. 'zhou' will always be pronunced 'zhou'. And if it's the first tone, it will always be pronunced in the same way. Unlike English where there are still words I come across that I can't sometimes pronounce (soft or hard 'g'??) And Japanese Kanji can have between 1 and 8 (maybe more, I only know of one Kanji having 8 readings between kun and on) readings to memorize, unlike Chinese, which almost always has only one reading to memorize. The grammar is also pretty basic and logical (in a way). This is just my opinion ofcourse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The very idea that one language is more difficult than another is a myth! How does one compare two languages? More specifically, what aspects of a given language does one compare? Are we talking about grammar? If that's the case, then all languages have complexities within their structures. Is the simple past in English more complex than that in French? If so, for whom and why?
Or are we talking about syntax? In French one says I YOU LOVE. Does this make it more complex than English I LOVE YOU? Perhaps only for the English and the French who are trying to learn each other's languages but not for, say, an Armenian whose language possesses both structures.
Again, it is always difficult to deal with how foreign languages construct the world, order it and express it. They all see the universe differently.
The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague that discussing it is profound waste of time.
I would argue that all languages are equally difficult to learn. All demand time, motivation, intelligence and talent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deconstructor wrote: |
| The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague |
But the statement A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN B FOR A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER is not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shaman

Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Posts: 446 Location: Hammertown
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Swedish is a fun one. I've become better at grasping the gist of a conversation, but when it comes my turn to speak things can be interesting.
The "sj" (aspirate) isn't too bad. The arbitrary sound of "k" - the familar plosive vs. "sh" - can be annoying.
"Does this bus go to Kista?"
"You mean Sheesta?"
I'm better with a dictionary now too. I hadn't been aware of the spelling rules regarding the new vowels: �, �, �. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deconstructor

Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 775 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ls650 wrote: |
| Deconstructor wrote: |
| The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague |
But the statement A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN B FOR A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER is not. |
Yours is equally vague. You're suggesting that all Anglophones would find a given language difficult to learn while some other nationality wouldn't. If so, where is the research baking up such hypothesis? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deconstructor wrote: |
| ls650 wrote: |
| Deconstructor wrote: |
| The statement LANGAUGE A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN LANGUAGE B is so vague |
But the statement A IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN B FOR A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER is not. |
Yours is equally vague. You're suggesting that all Anglophones would find a given language difficult to learn while some other nationality wouldn't. If so, where is the research baking up such hypothesis? |
I would agree that ls650 made the statement rather categorically (ie, he was generalizing). Generalizing is appropriate when talking about a class or category as a whole (acknowledging that there are exceptions to the rule should be unnecessary), although it is good to remember/remind folks that you are speaking in general.
But requiring research to back up his statement denies the validity of logical inference. There are an awful lot of things we accept as truths without requiring research to back them up. One example of this is something you have experienced as true throughout your life (for example, stating that a clear majority of overseas TEFLers are male, and that there are good reasons for this). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wildnfree
Joined: 14 Jun 2005 Posts: 134
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am a fluent Chinese speaker although Im not Chinese. Not any old Chinese, but Cantonese, which has 9 tones per sound and maintains many characteristics of ancient (therefore more complicated) Chinese languages.
Unfortunately, I have become too fluent in it and draw stares where ever I go. I consider myself fluent after maybe 1.5 years of living in Hong Kong. On the phone, people consider me a native speaker. I disagree that is hard. The grammar is so simple it is baby-like and I never learnt to read formally but can read Chinese well. It just happened as I paid attention to the words in signs, asked people how they were pronunced and remembered them.
I also have a good ear for tones and accents...after learning Spanish for a few months, I was mistaken for a Spaniard but most native speakers! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wildnfree wrote: |
| I also have a good ear for tones and accents...after learning Spanish for a few months, I was mistaken for a Spaniard but most native speakers! |
Wow! That's definitely not typical ability for most people, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abusalam4
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 143
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:42 pm Post subject: Difficult? |
|
|
Which language is the most difficult to learn for a native English speaker?
The question is relative, e.g.
Is Chinese? - It has no conjugation and declension system, and so in terns of grammar should be quite easy. There are difficulties to master pronunciation because of tonal system not known in English, and about writing we know of the thousands of characters that have to learned.
Is Arabic? - Yes, grammar, writing system and pronunciation present special challenges for the learner to master.
Etc.. etc.
The point I am trying to make is that thew question, in order to really answer it, must be in much more precise form. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|