| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wildchild

Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Puebla 2009 - 2010
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spiral said
| Quote: |
| I don't know what happens in U.S.-based programs, but it would have been absolutely unthinkable to mix the groups in my British uni, or in the Canadian programs I'm familiar with. |
I think we may be onto something here.
Sherri said:
| Quote: |
| Is there really no difference between a BA in Linguistics and an MA? |
From my experience in the States, it's one of those "yes and no."
From my experience, the content of the lectures, many of the homework assignments, and the exams were the same, as the classes I took were all mixed, undergrad and grad students together. Please note that some specialty grad class, or seminars, were grad students only but classes like intro to phonetics, phonology, syntax, discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, and CALL etc. were mixed.
There was a difference in the work load, i.e. grad students were given an extra assignment. For example, in Phonology, grad students were required to pick a language, say Basque for example, and write out the entire Phonology of the language. That's a lot of work! But as a grad student, you're also paying a lot of money, so they make you feel like you're getting your money's worth.
And that's for every class, Phonetics, Syntax etc. In the end, you can come out of there as a Basque expert! but with a little less hair that is now gray.
Oh, and then there is that little thing called the thesis. although many schools offer comprehensive exams or a project in place of the thesis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
MIIS (Monterey Institute of International Studies) doesn't mix grad and undergrad classes, as there isn't an undergrad program.
I think I would object to having such mixed classes. No, I know I would object.
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:10 pm Post subject: In NYC |
|
|
Ditto Teachers College at Columbia University. No undergrad program. Only grad programs in Applied Linguistics and TESOL.
Regards,
fat_c |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wildchild

Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Puebla 2009 - 2010
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmm...well then.
The tuition for a graduate student at the California state school where I did my BA is between $1,200 and $1,900 per semester. Non-residents and international students are required to pay an additional $339 per unit (classes are between 2 and 3 units).
Again, many of the class were mixed with grad and undergrad students.
How much for MIIS and Columbia? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the United States, it is generally not the "program" that might mix undergraduate and graduate students. Rather, the background and qualifications of the individual students themselves are what determine whether students enroll in courses that mix undergrads and postgrads.
If a student enrolls in an MA program without the necessary background in (for example) linguistics, that student will be required to enroll in certain advanced undergrad linguistics courses. The latter courses are usually listed as open to undergrad and grad students.
A student enrolling in an MA program with the necessary background and preparation would take only graduate-level courses from the start. There are typically no undergrads in those courses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:42 pm Post subject: Teachers College |
|
|
| wildchild wrote: |
| How much for [...] and Columbia? |
http://www.tc.columbia.edu/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livinginkorea
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 22 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I did a certificate and diploma in TEFL already so it was natural for me to eventually upgrade to do an M.A. I started last year and loving it so far. I found it by asking around on Dave's and a few people mentioned the University of Birmingham. I looked into it more and they have some centers around the world and even one in Korea, about 45 minutes from where I live so it was a blessing for me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomadder

Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 709 Location: Somewherebetweenhereandthere
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Scams. They should all be free or heavily subsidised. Don't feed the beast. And most people at that level need more practice than theory. End of story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I fed the beast and I got what I paid for.
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:24 am Post subject: Scam? Huh? |
|
|
| denise wrote: |
| Well, I fed the beast and I got what I paid for. |
Likewise for me.
My program was great because it gave me a healthy combination of theory and practice. I was also teaching full time while completing my degree. My M.A. program helped me improve substantially as a teacher.
Once again, I am glad that I earned the M.A. No scams there.
Regards,
fat_c |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sherri
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 749 Location: The Big Island, Hawaii
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nomadder wrote: |
| They should all be free or heavily subsidised. |
"They?" who is "'they" and why should they be free? Who is supposed to subsidised and why? That makes no sense to me.
| nomadder wrote: |
| And most people at that level need more practice than theory. |
What people, what level? What on earth are you talking about? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomadder

Joined: 15 Feb 2003 Posts: 709 Location: Somewherebetweenhereandthere
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well eventually some make back that money, maybe-it just takes some people a long time. I know people who have debts 10 or 20 years later. Just don't get why societies never invest in their future. Why should people pay a fortune to work? Pay away if you like. I just find the cost/benefit analysis rarely works out.
PS-Sherri-a little more caffeine in that coffee? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, I consider going into debt in order to better myself to be an investment in my future. I could easily have kept teaching at the same level--the same types of schools, the same responsibilities--without an MA, and had I gone that route I wouldn't be in debt today. Instead, I am in debt but have gotten jobs and responsibilities that were off-limits to me in my pre-MA days.
People invest in all sorts of silly things--property, stocks, etc. Why not education?
d |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|