Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Do you like Russian society?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Russia & C.I.S.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
maruss



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Posts: 1145
Location: Cyprus

PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 9:35 pm    Post subject: Well said!! Reply with quote

Or maybe the big sharks eat all the small fish-or leave them to starve while they have a banquet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canucktechie wrote:
Quote:
What I have learned in my time shuttling between Russia and America is that in Russia, people sin more openly. In America, it is hidden behind laws, customs, and smiles.

Those "laws, customs and smiles" are what makes employers in the US (and other Western countries) treat employees fairly, landlords treat tenants fairly, service people of all sorts treat customers well, keeps public officials from extorting bribes, etc, etc, etc.

Russia is simply a society without rules, or more precisely just one rule - the big guy does what he wants and the little guy gets out of the way.

If you find that refreshing, well enjoy.


Hi CT,
You are extrapolating something I'm not saying out of my previous post.
First of all, I do agree that those characteristics do result in those good things you describe in the west, although the big guy/little guy thing is fairly universal, and I read about some kind of corruption in western government on Google news nearly every day.

Russia is not 'simply' anything, anymore than America is. There are good and bad aspects and results to these qualities of keeping all at a median distance rather than dividing them into friends and strangers and letting the ones closer than Americans do and keeping the strangers further away.
You basically describe the good results/aspects of the western characteristics and are comparing them to the bad aspects of the Russian way. I could do the reverse. G.K. Chesterton said:
Quote:
"There are only two kinds of social structure conceivable - personal government and impersonal government. If my anarchic friends will not have rules - they will have rulers. Preferring personal government, with its tact and flexibility, is called Royalism. Preferring impersonal government, with its dogmas and definitions, is called Republicanism. Objecting broadmindedly both to kings and creeds is called Bosh." ("Imperialism" What's Wrong with the World)

I have had more than one experience with Russian bureaucracy where the rulers made decisions because of their flexibility with the rules that actually took pity on me as a human being, rather than blindly following the rules, as the American b. would have done and just screwed me.

If I were to attempt to describe the hypocrisy of an American employer (client) that smiles and jokes with you, and then says goodbye to you and then calls your temp agency and quietly has you fired all because you commented to a co-worker that the pay was minimum wage, I would point out that it is a negative aspect of that "median distancing" (for lack of a better descriptive term).

What I have found refreshing in Russia is the lack of political correctness - the practical application of pluralism, but that's another kettle of fish.

Perhaps the difference in our POVs is that I really have committed to living here, whereas most of you spent only a few years here, and always as an outsider. My experience in marrying and settling in a community far away from the insane capital has been of a gradual opening up and closing of that distance the Russians keep most of us at. I really have committed, they see that, I'm teaching theirs kids and raising my own and sending them to their teachers, they know me and I know them, because it's NOT Moscow or SP, and it's been completely different from the one or two year tours of the foreign teacher on contract, who come and go. The only friend I have in the expat community is another man who has done the same thing. We know what Russia is like, we have seen the good and the bad, and we know what the good and bad in America is like - and yet we live here, by choice. It's just that my whole experience belies the simplistic "America (West) good, Russia bad" opinions, which, while understandably formed from experience, are based on rather shallow experience. (Speaking from my "greater depth", anyway.) Maybe the Russian government will screw me someday (I've already been subjected to unfair treatment from my own gov't simply due to suspicion at my living in Russia). That won't change what is true about the people, and if our positions were reversed, you perhaps would be bothered and annoyed to see simplistic presentations of a people that you know better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mdk



Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 425

PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reviewing this thread one point has struck me.

When I would walk on the street in Moscow it was not uncommon for Russians to stop and politely ask me for directions. When I would answer in my labored Russian that I understood the language poorly, they would laugh good-naturedly and excuse themselves. Now, none of my Russian friends ever thought that I dressed or looked like a native Russian.

Perhaps it was my relaxed and confident manner or my trustworthy open Scots-American face. I don't know.

But I do think Russians are particularly sensitive to non-verbal cues. If you go around thinking they are bad people - they will pick that up just like it was wrtitten on your forehead in italics.

So if you are being treated poorlyy bt Russians - or more poorlyy than tthey treat each otther - you should look at what vibes you may be putting out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpvanderwerf2001



Joined: 02 Oct 2003
Posts: 1117
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mdk wrote:
Reviewing this thread one point has struck me.

When I would walk on the street in Moscow it was not uncommon for Russians to stop and politely ask me for directions. When I would answer in my labored Russian that I understood the language poorly, they would laugh good-naturedly and excuse themselves. Now, none of my Russian friends ever thought that I dressed or looked like a native Russian.

Perhaps it was my relaxed and confident manner or my trustworthy open Scots-American face. I don't know.

But I do think Russians are particularly sensitive to non-verbal cues. If you go around thinking they are bad people - they will pick that up just like it was wrtitten on your forehead in italics.

So if you are being treated poorlyy bt Russians - or more poorlyy than tthey treat each otther - you should look at what vibes you may be putting out.


I think you're onto something here, mdk. Although I don't think that every bad experience is due to this, having a positive attitude and outlook towards the locals go a long way! (BTW, I don't think this is limited to Russians, I've found this everywhere I've been in the world!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bharrell



Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 102

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So if you are being treated poorlyy bt Russians - or more poorly than tthey treat each otther - you should look at what vibes you may be putting out.



Russia has been brutal country for a very long time. There's no denying the history. Just like a child that grows up in an abusive houshold doesn't know there are other ways to behave, they think they are normal. Where else would the following event possibly occur?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2008/jul/23/saintstalin

Anyway, I've said enough. Some people would probably like living in Hell, and that's perfectly ok by me...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bharrell wrote:
Quote:
So if you are being treated poorlyy bt Russians - or more poorly than tthey treat each otther - you should look at what vibes you may be putting out.



Russia has been brutal country for a very long time. There's no denying the history. Just like a child that grows up in an abusive houshold doesn't know there are other ways to behave, they think they are normal. Where else would the following event possibly occur?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2008/jul/23/saintstalin

Anyway, I've said enough. Some people would probably like living in Hell, and that's perfectly ok by me...

America (or insert your country) has been a brutal country for a very long time. There's no denying the history. From the Insurrection Acts to the forcing back and gradual destruction of Indian tribes to the imprisonment of people based on ancestry in wartime to Iraq and Abu Ghraib, they are just like children that grow up in an abusive household and don't know there are other ways to behave, and they think they are normal.

Again, this is comparing what is good in one country to what is bad in another country. It is like comparing the positive points of commuting to work in your own automobile in a city to the inconveniences of public transport. It states an obvious but half truth. It is not a reasonable comparison. Plus, its assumption of superiority is Pharisaical in nature. It doesn't "examine the beam in your own eye" or see what is actually good and even better about Russia vis-a-vis America, England, or wherever. (And even then, generalities tend to be unfair - to ignore variations.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canucktechie



Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 343
Location: Moscow

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is only one objective measure of whether one country is better than the other, and that is how many people voluntarily move from one to the other.

How many people have immigrated from the former Russian Empire, USSR, and FSU to the US? How many people have moved the other way?

What more needs to be said.

And that's not meant as an apologia for the US BTW.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canucktechie wrote:
There is only one objective measure of whether one country is better than the other, and that is how many people voluntarily move from one to the other.

How many people have immigrated from the former Russian Empire, USSR, and FSU to the US? How many people have moved the other way?

What more needs to be said.

And that's not meant as an apologia for the US BTW.

Hi, CT.
Your understanding of what "objective" is is clearly based on a materialist philosophy, and I suspect as well as on assumptions and attitudes enumerated above. When you say words like 'good' or 'better' you are really mixing in a number of factors and leaving out others. There is no single final answer for everybody, which is what 'objective' means.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ukrcanadian



Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a Canadian, I can say that it may not be so much of a "tourist" response that Russians put forth, but rather more of an "American" response; it is likely true and very unfortunate. Even in Canada, many Americans (not all, that's for sure) give a superior sense of attitude; as some posters called is, a "know it all" sort of thing. A few years ago an American yelled at me becuase I told him we didn't have an Oak leaf on our flag, but a maply leaf. He was pissed that I corrected him.

I'm not trying to upset people, but there is a reason American travelers put different countries flags on their packs when they go to Europe; they don't always get the best treatment as Americans. I will state this; I worked in tourism for several years, and the majority of people I worked with were American and the vast majority were splendid, polite individuals that I was happy to see again. However, 5% of people who are dinks (no matter where you're from) plaster a bad image on the whole bunch (like those few bad experiences people had in Russia that soured their whole time there). I tried not to let this happen to me (while working), because I was able to persevere, as Canadians and Americans share the same language --I could judge each individual, not the whole group. However, I can't always blame other people form different countries for ignoring people they can't communicate with. Learning some of the native tongue, in an effort to communicate, goes a long ways, as does following that countries belief systems (IE: bowing in Japan as opposed to shaking hands). If you put a good effort forth and they ignore you, then yes, they are in the wrong. But why expect a Russian/ukrainian/pole etc to learn English, in the off-shot chance that they will need it more than a couple times each month?

Lets just remember that it is the differences between countries that even make them worth going to. If everything was the same, we wouldn't even have a reason to get out of the living room.

Nick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canucktechie



Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 343
Location: Moscow

PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rusmeister wrote:

Your understanding of what "objective" is is clearly based on a materialist philosophy

No it's not. I am not assuming any particular motive for people moving from one country to another. I'm sure you know as well as I do that many people left the former Russian Empire or its successors to seek religious or intellectual freedom, not just a higher material well-being.

Objective means based on facts not opinions, and the fact is that the Russian Empire and its successors have lost a huge number of people to other countries over the last century or so. Also a huge number of people died due to the ineptness and cruelty of its rulers. Nowhere else has there been such a large proportion of the population lost over this time, except perhaps Poland, and that loss was inflicted on it by its larger neighbours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maruss



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Posts: 1145
Location: Cyprus

PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:45 pm    Post subject: I have to agree with Canucktechie.... Reply with quote

My fathers family originally came from Lvov,in what was then Eastern Poland, and his mother,along with him and his sisters went to England in the mid 1930's because she was afraid of developments in Germany and Russia,quite rightly as it turned out......His father,who owned a business and had both Russian and German customers,was confident he could cope with any problems and stayed on..wrongly as it turned out and he was never heard of again.Little was ever said in the family while my grandmother was alive about what happened,but I did learn that some of the relatives survived the Germans but not the Soviets when they captured the area for the second time...I can remember my aunt once telling me when I was young that the Soviets were as bad as the Nazis but nobody knew much in those days so nobody talked about it etc etc, adding that maybe one day the truth would be known?
Last November there was an excellent six-part B.B.C.2 drama documentary series called 'Behind Closed Doors' about what Stalin really got up to in World War Two and it contained some excellent interviews with people such as former NKVD officers who were involved in the Katyn atrocities and other archive material which was previously not publicised.
I certainly also agree with Rusmeister that the Soviet regime was at best often brutal,especially in Stalins time and Orlando Figes 'The Whisperers' published in 2007 throws much light on the darkest era of modern Russian history.Ominously enough,the F.S.B. raided the offices of Memorial in St.Petes. last December and seized most of the archives which the author used for the book,although fortunately he has copies in safe storage abroad.
I will leave everyone to their own judgment but sorry if I sense something is not as it should be in Russia today?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rusmeister



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 867
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canucktechie wrote:


Objective means based on facts not opinions, and the fact is that the Russian Empire and its successors have lost a huge number of people to other countries over the last century or so. Also a huge number of people died due to the ineptness and cruelty of its rulers. Nowhere else has there been such a large proportion of the population lost over this time, except perhaps Poland, and that loss was inflicted on it by its larger neighbours.

Yes, 'objective' IS based on facts. But which facts do you choose? I see you have chosen negative facts about Russia and compared them with positive facts about the West. How is that objective? My very presence in Russia as an immigrant points to different facts and experiences that you do not address at all. Your view of facts is ultimately controlled by your underlying philosophy - what you believe, what your worldview is. Mine differs greatly from yours, I would say. I don't even hold well-being in this world as the most important or ultimate goal for human beings. How does that square with your interpretation?

If a historian chews views, whose views does he choose? Smile

And ukrcanadian's post was also right on.

Maruss, it is more accurate to realize that something is wrong with the whole world. It's not as if Russia is messed up and everywhere else it's OK. GKC wrote a masterpiece on this either next year or a hundred years ago. Either way, it is mega-relevant today: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/whats_wrong.html
Because people will usually only read soundbites these days:
Quote:
A book of modern social inquiry has a shape that is somewhat sharply defined. It begins as a rule with an analysis, with statistics, tables of population, decrease of crime among Congregationalists, growth of hysteria among policemen, and similar ascertained facts; it ends with a chapter that is generally called "The Remedy." It is almost wholly due to this careful, solid, and scientific method that "The Remedy" is never found. For this scheme of medical question and answer is a blunder; the first great blunder of sociology. It is always called stating the disease before we find the cure. But it is the whole definition and dignity of man that in social matters we must actually find the cure before we find the disease .

The fallacy is one of the fifty fallacies that come from the modern madness for biological or bodily metaphors. It is convenient to speak of the Social Organism, just as it is convenient to speak of the British Lion. But Britain is no more an organism than Britain is a lion. The moment we begin to give a nation the unity and simplicity of an animal, we begin to think wildly. Because every man is a biped, fifty men are not a centipede. This has produced, for instance, the gaping absurdity of perpetually talking about "young nations" and "dying nations," as if a nation had a fixed and physical span of life. Thus people will say that Spain has entered a final senility; they might as well say that Spain is losing all her teeth. Or people will say that Canada should soon produce a literature; which is like saying that Canada must soon grow a new moustache. Nations consist of people; the first generation may be decrepit, or the ten thousandth may be vigorous. Similar applications of the fallacy are made by those who see in the increasing size of national possessions, a simple increase in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man. These people, indeed, even fall short in subtlety of the parallel of a human body. They do not even ask whether an empire is growing taller in its youth, or only growing fatter in its old age. But of all the instances of error arising from this physical fancy, the worst is that we have before us: the habit of exhaustively describing a social sickness, and then propounding a social drug.

It gets even better.
If that doesn't make one want to read more, then one must be really boring. (The first chapter has only six paragraphs, and the connection to the OP is in the fifth. Go read it.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bradley326



Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reading over this thread today I was reminded of a little Russian poem I love.

Умом Россию не понять,
Аршином общим не измерить:
У ней особенная стать �
В Россию можно только верить.

Russia can't be understood with the mind,
And can't be measured with a common yardstick:
It has a peculiar character-
In Russia you can only believe.

I thought it was fitting for the topic of this thread Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jonniboy



Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 751
Location: Panama City, Panama

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canucktechie wrote:
There is only one objective measure of whether one country is better than the other, and that is how many people voluntarily move from one to the other.

How many people have immigrated from the former Russian Empire, USSR, and FSU to the US? How many people have moved the other way?

What more needs to be said.


No this doesn't prove that one country is "better" than the other, merely that it has a better economy. During the apartheid era for example many blacks moved to South Africa from economically poorer countries. I doubt they did it as a thumbs up to the racist policies of the pre 1990s administrations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bfrog



Joined: 30 May 2008
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jonniboy wrote:
canucktechie wrote:
There is only one objective measure of whether one country is better than the other, and that is how many people voluntarily move from one to the other.

How many people have immigrated from the former Russian Empire, USSR, and FSU to the US? How many people have moved the other way?

What more needs to be said.


No this doesn't prove that one country is "better" than the other, merely that it has a better economy. During the apartheid era for example many blacks moved to South Africa from economically poorer countries. I doubt they did it as a thumbs up to the racist policies of the pre 1990s administrations.
canucktechie may have made a gross generalization in saying that high immigration means a "good" country, but he has a better point than some of the nauseatingly pretentious and hole-ridden attempts at debate. And during apartheid many people also fled to South Africa to escape military dictatorships, civil war, famine, and a host of other reasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Russia & C.I.S. All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China