|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nolefan

Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 1458 Location: on the run
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:09 pm Post subject: comic relief |
|
|
Coluche, a French comedian once said:
God is like sugar in a glass of hot milk; the more you look for it, the harder it is to find[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tammy
Joined: 07 Jan 2004 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like I said in an earlier post on this thread, it's hard even for a Muslim to understand Islam to it's full extent.
I have a friend whose father is a very religious man, and whenever I ask him questions about Islam, he always seems to answer them to my satisfaction. It just seems that no matter how many of my questions he answers, I always seem to go back with a new question after a few days. He's quite an old man and I'm sure it gives him pleasure to know that a young girl like me is so interested to learn more about her religion, especially since his own kids don't seem to show any interest.
There are many things written in the Quran that, I'm sure, we will both interpret differently. OK, so I accept that it is written, but I honestly can't think of one possible situation where a husband would raise his hand to his wife and I would accept that he was right. I can't think of a situation where a husband would hit his wife and, in the eyes of any God, he was right.
I understand that you have difficulty accepting why it is written. I've had similar conversations with many people in the past and have learnt to just agree to disagree.
Or maybe this is something I should go back to the old man about  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wolf

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 1245 Location: Middle Earth
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I'm not a Muslim, but as a Baha'i I do believe in the divine station of Mohammed and the significance of His Manifestation.
| sidjameson wrote: |
| The fact that it [wife beating] is written in ANY form and under any circumstance is awful. |
True. Of this day and age. But I imagine that the laws of Islam must have been a big step upward for women living in 7th century Arabia. Instead of having few or no laws at all about such things, suddenly there were some laws about such things. God may be infallable and All Merciful, but human beings sure aren't. The "wondows upgrage" analogy has aleardy been used - the idea that God sends a similar but progressively more advanced message to humanity as we progress.
And yet, as I said, in this day and age, we as a species have come far enough along in our spiritual development that we need not resort to physical voilence to solve relationship issues (mind you this is still common everywhere, but lamentably so.) I think I'll go so far as to state that the social laws of all the relgions of the past are impossible to apply to today's world. Well, impossible to apply justly. This is one of many reasons why I chose to be a Baha'i.
I also believe that conflict in the name of religion utterly sucks:
| Quote: |
The third teaching of Bah�u�ll�h is that religion must be the source of fellowship, the cause of unity and the nearness of God to man. If it rouses hatred and strife it is evident that absence of religion is preferable and an irreligious man better than one who professes it. According to the divine will and intention religion should be the cause of love and agreement, a bond to unify all mankind for it is a message of peace and good-will to man from God.
(Abdu'l-Baha, Baha'i World Faith - Abdu'l-Baha Section, p. 239) |
Which is, incidently, another reason I'm a Baha'i.
I don't believe that God causes suffering. God didn't poorly manage my old company and cause it to go bankrupt: that was the people I worked for. Human beings can choose wether or not to inflict suffering on one another.
I don't believe God allows suffering either. In the Baha'i Faith, being a cause of disunity and discord is forbidden in no uncertain terms. The spirit of this Law of God can be seen in many of the world's religions (the "golden rule" is part of this.) We choose wether or not to follow that law. I, for one, agree with Sid's reaction to the idea of domestic voilence, and (I assume) srife in general: it's high time that humanity - all of humanity - smarten up and begin behaving ourselves.
| Quote: |
| O Son of Being! Bring thyself to account each day ere thou art summoned to a reckoning... . |
I, for one, don't want to appear before the Ancient Beauty with a lifetime of bigotry and indifference to my fellow human beings behind me.
Wow. I could go on for ages. But I'll stop here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leeroy
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 777 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An articulate reply to the question asked yesterday on IslamOnline... "Are women inferior?"
| Quote: |
Does Qur'aan say that in your opinion?
Another point I would like to know: When and how did the
women of the world, specially those in the West and other
countries like Japan and the far-East got their current
rights and freedom? Do you belive it was the eduction?
I am sure you will agree with me they got that in the last
100 years only through their own efforts and perseverence.
Did the women of the West get their freedom through the
Religion or the Old Testament or the New Testament? Not at
all. Can that be attributed to Christianity or Judaism?
Certainly not. These thoughts and respects evolve as we
progress and people get more educated. I am a muslim and I
do not believe that my wife is under my subjugation at all
and neither am I under hers. I hace earned her respect and
she hsa earned mine. The Qur'aan guides us telling us what
pleases God most.
I wish to clarify that whether it is Ibne-Kathir or
Bukhari or XYZ, Qur'aan has not yet been perfectly
translated in other languages or English to explain the
true and real meanings of the Qur'aanic Arabic that was
spoken by Prophet Muhammad's tribe Quraish. However most
muslims who read and understand Qur'aan perfectly well are
fully aware of the various idioms, proverbs, metaphors,
similes and parables well and are at peace with Islam and
Qur'aan, but all that is lost in translation. A lot of
Qur'aanic verses were revealed to Muhammad when people
used to ask him questions and he could not answer as he
was not a learned man. All of a sudden he would start
hearing the answers and would deliver it in front of the
people. Thus the context and situation is very important
in the understanding of many verses.
Please note that Qur'aan was revealed 1400 years ago and
one has to imagine the habits, culture, customs, manners
of the time. We are talking of a people who were ruthless,
barbaric, had no regards for humanity and might was right
to deliver justice with one blow or flick of the blade.
To those people, the message of Qur'aan hit like a
thunderbolt waking them up. Within 23 years the entire
people fell flat on their faces in prostration and
adoration of God Almighty and started obeying the codes of
conduct, regards, kindness and courtesy to each other.
Qur'aan does not state that a woman is inferior to man.
Prophet was himself working for his first wife Khadija, a
Jewess businesswoman before his marriage, he used to
follow her instructions and after marriage( she was 40 and
he was 25 ) she did not treat him as a servant but
extended to him the respect that a husband deserves and
Prophet too extended her the respect that a wife deserves.
In the sight of God it is not just men who can be devout
and devoted. Please read the praise showered by God
Almighty on Maryam (Mary) and the Lady from the Pharoah's
family, whom God calls as the Most Devout and Devoted to
God. ( Surah 66:11-12 Al-Tahreem )
Men were not only the providers or maintainers of women in
those days, there were many women who were well-off and
powerful, who too maintained their husbands. The meccan
chief ( arch enemy of Prophet) Abu Sufian's wife Hinda was
a powerful woman.
In general, the men took care of their wives and families
in all times in every civilisation and culture. The
sanctity of marriage doesn't come from: " Look,I am the
Provider and the Maintainer ". That is the problem when
one reads translations in English. The message is teaching
both men and women to respect each other's rights, respect
and take care of each other. There is no intent in the
verses that men are superior to women, although our
Mullahs and some others may love that. that would be their
joy, not mine. |
http://www.islamonline.net/Discussion/English/bbs.asp?aParID=316890&aTpID=242&aGroupID=61594&action=move&aPathID=242&aSubject=Women+are+inferior |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Teacher in Rome
Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Posts: 1286
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
This type of thing played itself out in my mother'S generation time and time again. It isn't the pc thing to do in the west but Islam is a backward religion followed by primitive people. How can anyone believe that THAT is the word of GOD. Why don't more people care about this?
|
Sid: calling an entire religion "backward" and its followers "primitive" is really inflammatory. It makes you sound like an ignorant redneck who lashes out at something without thinking through the consequences of what you have said.
You cannot condemn huge swathes of the world as being backward and primitive. Nobody is suggesting that wife-beating is a good thing, and Tammy has gone to lengths to explain what the Koran says.
I'm no expert on Islam - or on any religion, for that matter. But I have had the pleasure of living in a Muslim family where no beating of any kind took place. To suggest that these kind people are primitive and backward says more about your prejudices than anything else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:28 pm Post subject: Try, try again |
|
|
Darn, I just can't stay away - it's like watching a slow-motion train wreck.
But I'll keep it brief. I'll quote G.K. Chesterton, who remarked about Christianity:
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried." - Chapter 5, What's Wrong With The World, 1910
for Christian, simply substitute Islamic.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nolefan

Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 1458 Location: on the run
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2004 11:31 pm Post subject: women rights |
|
|
The concept of Islam leaves plenty of room within the rules for "ijtihad" which refers to looking over the religion and changing a few things to go with the times.
Unfortunately, most leaders are fearful of this and will not go there. One exception to the rule is king Mohamed 6 of Morocco that Changed the bill of women rights giving them similar status to that of men as far aas inheritance, divorce, marriage,....
Some might say that one should not need to do that but by the same token, it proves that religion can adapt to new times..we just have to give it a chance.
I think that keeping this debate about "beating women" is a rather narrow-minded way of dealing with such a topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James_T_Kirk

Joined: 20 Sep 2003 Posts: 357 Location: Ten Forward
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| so really, the main differences are in the diets. I, myself, like to compare the various books to Micrsoft Windows: 3.1, then 95, then 98 then 2000, then xp... each version builds on the previous one, fixes a few bugs and creates a bunch more. Islam just happens to be the lastest release and a new version is OVERDUE... |
Interesting take, Nolefan. If more religions were running like a Mac OS or Unix, the world would be a better place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nolefan

Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 1458 Location: on the run
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, Mac Os X is pretty much Unix nowdays.... I did not look at it from this angle but it could be....
the point I was trying to make was that an UPDATE is Overdue...
| James_T_Kirk wrote: |
| Quote: |
| so really, the main differences are in the diets. I, myself, like to compare the various books to Micrsoft Windows: 3.1, then 95, then 98 then 2000, then xp... each version builds on the previous one, fixes a few bugs and creates a bunch more. Islam just happens to be the lastest release and a new version is OVERDUE... |
Interesting take, Nolefan. If more religions were running like a Mac OS or Unix, the world would be a better place. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sidjameson
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 629 Location: osaka
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Teacher in Rome.
Yes I agree, reading my rather strong words they are a bit on the combustable side. Saying these things quite so strongly doesn't do much good even if there is something in what is said.
But I will defend my position. First though I am happy to accept that I could be wrong. I don't know anywhere near enough about the Koran(who does?) so feel free to enlighten me if I go wayward.
Is islam primitive? Well of course there are a lot of good teachings in the Koran, rules good for any society but there are plenty of things that most modern day thinkers would deem completely unacceptable. Wife beating being one of them. Now correct me if I am wrong but the cannons of Buddhism are also considered a significant religous teaching. Written 1000 years before the Koran I find it a very relevant piece, full of love and compassion. I'm no expert on that too but do you know of any equivilant passage that the Buddha taught that 21st century thinking would find so disagreeable? Not from a spiritual point of view, both works need "the leap of faith" but from a moral one. So for me Islam is primitive and not the "software upgrade" that has been posted elsewhere.
Are muslims a primitive people? Well, I think that you are choosing to give the word primitive a more negative meaning than it has. An Amazonian tribe untouched by western civilization is considered a primitve society. I know it's a judgment call, but if a society hasn't invented the wheel for a technoligical example or still believes in stoning unmarried mothers, a moral example, I would consider this to be a primitve society. This isn't a value judgement by the way. Economists use the term "a primitve market" to talk about a market that hasn't been developed yet. Ok I did use the word backward as I do feel that choosing a primitve intellectual stand point is, for me, a backward step. Wouldn't it be considered primitive if I believed that the cure for venerial desease was the placing of a leach on the old one eyed monster?(England in the dark-and painful ages) Wouldn't it also be considered a backward step if in the light of modern medicine I turned my back on penicilan and reached for one of the slimy critters?
But as I said, I always feel that my view can always be improved. Maybe I just misunderstand these things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I live in Turkey, which is 99% muslim and is a secular state. It is not primitive. My co workers are not primitive. They are Muslim, but that does not mean they don't live in the modern world. They are educated, open minded, curious, loving, and, for the most part, kind. They have heard of the wheel. They know how to read. None of the women I am friends with wears a headscarf. In fact, most women here don't. I doubt that more of the men beat their wives here than in Canada (or wherever)... men beat their wives regardless of culture or faith. It's a power trip.
Please correct me if I am wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sidjameson
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 629 Location: osaka
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Many agreeable points Yaramaz but the thing is they, being muslim, still believe in a God that(and I wanna be absolutely clear about this-Monty Python ) thinks that it is sometimes acceptable to beat a wife. This is IN the koran. Therfore I see islam as a primitive body of knowlege and somebody who (in 2004) chooses to believe in it as somebody who has embraced backward thinking.
Of course this isn't a judgement on a whole person. I've met many lovely muslims. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the Judeo-Christian god was rather keen on violence too. Smiting this and that and the other, and not sparing the rod and so forth.
Next topic?
Dang, Denise, if you are here I really need that Seabreeze from the Crimson room... sorry Capergirl, for mistaking you for a bartender. My bad.
And now for something completely different.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wolf

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 1245 Location: Middle Earth
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Come see the violence inherent in the system! Come see the violence inherent in the system! Help, help! I'm being oppressed.
Which reminds me...
Aren't Christians supposed to belive in witches? Sounds rather backward to me.
Yamaraz, do you weigh the same as a duck?
I think we should start a thread on how to use sheep bladders to prevent earthquakes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sidjameson
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 629 Location: osaka
|
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes, but what have the muslims ever given us?
I guess we all know where this thread is going now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|