Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Interac Yokohama. Supervisor gets skewered by teacher.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stumptowny



Joined: 29 May 2011
Posts: 310

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So who all is working now until 16:30 without a salary raise? Bueller?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rxk22



Joined: 19 May 2010
Posts: 1629

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2015 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What happened? Did then extend ALT hours in your area? I'd join the union if I worked for any of those monkey companies
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nicenicegaijin



Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 157

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2015 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally would not bother joining the union and just get a better job. These jobs are just entry level jobs meant for people who just want to come to Japan to experience it and those are the candidates they want to attract.

If due to laziness, lack of forward planning, lack of ambition or lack of intelligence and found myself stuck in either eikaiwa, or ALTing or direct hire English teacher, I would join a union.

I have never needed to join a union, even at the university jobs I have done, I haven't needed to join. If a problem arose at work I would join though. I know of a few people who have been in NAMBU and they have won cases. One was a manager at a dispatch company who was fired, he stayed at home for about 6 months in the end the dispatch company had to re-hire him and pay him for the 6 months he sat at home.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stumptowny



Joined: 29 May 2011
Posts: 310

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. Zues, what happened here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weigookin74



Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 265

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you go to a school and are well liked, especially by the kids, can't you just ask to be hired directly after the first year? Just tell your school straight up about the BS the dispatches put you through and you don'twant to go through that and if they want you to stay to get the prinipcal to call the education office on your behalf. Otherwise, it's time to move on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nightsintodreams



Joined: 18 May 2010
Posts: 558

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nope. There's a clause in the contracts which specifically states that you cannot do that. Something about conflicts of interest, working for a competitor...bla bla bla.

Whether such a clause is legal or not is irrelevant, the Japanese schools and BOEs abide by such rules and so wont employ you.

Anyway, most of the places that use dispatch companies simply don't want the hassle of dealing with foreigners, not matter how good they are at Japanese or teaching.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightsintodreams wrote:
Anyway, most of the places that use dispatch companies simply don't want the hassle of dealing with foreigners, not matter how good they are at Japanese or teaching.

I've never really understood this - I mean, as opposed to the hassle of endlessly dealing with the dispatch company (who may employ a foreign-face go-between anyway!) as umpteen AETs "act up" or quite due to the shoddy conditions? Direct employment and/or better conditions would nip a lot of these problems in the bud.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marley'sghost



Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fluffyhamster wrote:
nightsintodreams wrote:
Anyway, most of the places that use dispatch companies simply don't want the hassle of dealing with foreigners, not matter how good they are at Japanese or teaching.

I've never really understood this - I mean, as opposed to the hassle of endlessly dealing with the dispatch company (who may employ a foreign-face go-between anyway!) as umpteen AETs "act up" or quite due to the shoddy conditions? Direct employment and/or better conditions would nip a lot of these problems in the bud.


Some do eventually do eventually see that they are wasting their money on dispatch companies and eventually hire directly. Very, very few AETs do manage to "hijack" the contract from their dispatch company. I know one guy who did it, but he does not go advertising the fact.
The only real service a dispatch co provides in the end is insurance. If the AET is a direct hire and screws up, it's the school who has to take all the blame. If it's a dispatch AET who screws up, the school can pass the lion's share of the blame on the company. In most boards of education the bean counters who do the budgeting don't know or care about the quality of education, but they do understand covering their, uh, positions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, if the schools keep getting a new AET every year or indeed every term, chances are there's going to be trouble sooner or later, and fat lot of good it'll do blaming the dispatcher. A fair few schools must see a number of reasonably good AETs come and go, and think to themselves "Better the foreign devil we knew last year than the one we've now got! If only...".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marley'sghost



Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember that, at least in the public schools, teacher/staff transfers are as natural as the changing of the seasons. I've been working at my current schools for 7 years now. Out of the 60+ teachers at my schools, there are maybe....10 max, who were here when I started. About 5-6 years is the average tenure I'd say. Having a new ALT every year is often just sort of the norm. It's always a new "devil". The idea that an ALT (or really any foreign worker) is going to stick around for longer than 2-3 years at most, is one that Japan in general has yet to get it's collective head around.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fluffyhamster



Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 3292
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, I wouldn't want or expect to stay in the same position for years and years (unless it was a case of developing and improving a unique English programme or something). I'm just saying that for what the BOEs pay these intermediate exploiters, they are getting very bad value in terms of retaining any quality at all. Nobody is going to stick around for a further race to the bottom.

Why is it so difficult to identify an AET or two with nous, make them direct hires with responsibility for further hiring, and hey presto waste and various other problems solved. A lot more cities should do this than just flush the same or more money straight into some fatcat's pockets.

So, no iron ricebowl necessary, but decent pay and a few benefits (uncontested nenkyu, possibly NHI contributions) wouldn't go amiss.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mitsui



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1562
Location: Kawasaki

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They want young, ignorant teachers who don't know Japanese.
Some people think that teachers get tired of Japan after three years,
so they must be kept young and fresh.
Young females are what they want, so if a male teacher doesn't get a contract, hopefully a female teacher will.


If you know Japanese at my level, it becomes threatening, since I can teach by myself. Plus I am in a union.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mitsui



Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1562
Location: Kawasaki

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 3:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Plus they want you to play a role and they don't want you to think and ask questions.
You cannot be treated as an equal since you are second class to them.

Also, some teachers won't be liked, so you could even be gossiped about.
This happens if you get a reputation for being strict or kowai.
It is more important if the NETs class is liked than if the students actually learn.
So the idea is that new teachers are easier to handle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timothypfox



Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 492

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2015 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nicenicegaijin, I'm surprised you haven't needed a union given your continual condescending and self-aggrandizing character on these forums (ad hominem attack intended). But your judgemental character aside, people do get stuck sometimes at lower paying jobs despite forward planning and thinking ahead. Also, not everyone has "failed" if they don't teach at a university. The adjacent campus connected to my high school had a recent job opening, but I did not consider moving over there because the work looked quite frankly much less interesting for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steki47



Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 1029
Location: BFE Inaka

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fluffyhamster wrote:
Well, if the schools keep getting a new AET every year or indeed every term, chances are there's going to be trouble sooner or later, and fat lot of good it'll do blaming the dispatcher. A fair few schools must see a number of reasonably good AETs come and go, and think to themselves "Better the foreign devil we knew last year than the one we've now got! If only...".


Reading between the lines, I get the impression that BOEs don't think like that. They view ALTs as largely interchangeable and-let's be honest-we don't have much responsibility anyway. Why bother with investing in a foreign teacher for any length of time? If we are simply flash card monkeys, who cares?

Furthermore, I can't imagine Japan collectively trying to recruit and encourage long-term foreign teachers. Do JTEs want experienced ALTs in the classroom who may threaten their control over the classroom or show them up in front of students? Don't think so.

The worst part is that this all creates a negative feedback cycle in which ALTs rotate through the schools and are not used effectively and the Japanese teachers view us as not being worthy of trust or responsibility.

On the bright side, it is an easy job with a lot of holiday. Today is my last day of work before summer vacation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China