|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maybe my major gripe at the big chains should be this-
why do they sink the level of service to such a low level when they operate here in China - for example where do EF's least qualified employees work - isn't that in china - dont you have to be a qualified teacher to work in their outlets in other parts of the world.
No I'm one of those ol' sceptics that immediatly think that a chain like EF should be using its vast resources to raise standards here - not just sinking to the level of the others in a mad money grabbing frenzy caused by the emergence of this market. But then again this is just a personal assumption - and I certainly can't see a equivalent home grown product that I would ever send any of my children to - regardless of how frantic I was for them to learn English. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am reposting my earlier question as I believe that it is a valid question in this discussion but it has so far gone unanswered.
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
| I would be interested in seeing if those who suggest that chain schools should be avoided could offer alternative suggestions? So yes, we have heard the many opinions as to what this specific school does wrong, so lets here some information about specific schools that these people believe do everything right? |
I don't know why this thread is concentrating on one particular chain school considering that they are pretty much the same.
Here is my take so far:
1. Hourly pay rates may be lower in many chain schools than some independant private training schools, but often higher than positions in government run schools. It is worth however factoring in the fact that chains can often offer a larger number of hours for those teachers who want to earn more, whereas some of the independants may not be able to do this.
2. It seems quite clear that the workload in private training schools is higher than most positions in government schools and universities. There does not seem to be much difference however between independant private training institutes and private training institutes that are part of a chain, so are we really comparing apples with oranges when we try to compare chain schools with government schools. I think so.
3. Facilities, locations, support, training, texts and curriculum, are generally far better in private training institute positions than for government or university positions.
4. Government and university positions are almost all Monday to Friday gigs, whereas private training institutes often involve evening and weekend work. This is certainly a personal preference and I don't see that it is something that these private companies do wrong, but just something that they do differently. It is however worth emphasizing this to newbies to make sure that there are no misunderstandings.
As far as comparing independantly owned private institutes with private institutes that are part of a chain I believe that the following probably applies:
1. Independants can be quite hit and miss. You can either score a really plumb job or get a real lemon. Chain schools on the whole seem to be a far more secure option in that you pretty much know what you are getting into before you sign up.
2. I haven't seen a lot (in fact I don't recall any but I will leave it open) of cases where a teacher at a chain school has been totally ripped off. Having said this I am fully aware that there are certain schools in some chains which should really best be avoided, but lets start referring to these particular schools by name rather than linking these problems to the chain of schools. There are adequate cases of teachers being deliberately ripped off by independant schools to suggest that teachers research such positions carefully before signing up.
3. Chain school positions are pretty secure in that overall you can expect that your school is actually still going to be there when you show up for work tomorrow, whereas an indepedant could theoretically disappear overnight. Canilx being the big exception here but to my knowledge all foreign teachers did get paid in that case. Anyone know otherwise?
4. Chains generally have a curriculum and texts specific for their programs and training in the usage of these. Independants may or may not. This can be a good or a bad thing depending upon what you want out of the experience.
5. Legality of employment is an issue at most of these private schools in my opinion, regardless of whether or not they are part of a chain or independant. I have not however seen any reports of teachers at chain schools being deported for working illegally or the like, but I have seen the occasional report of teachers at independant schools running foul of the law.
This is by no means a comprehensive list, just my take to date.
So I am curious about how other would compare independant private institutes against private institutes that are part of a chain. I really think that this is what we should be doing in this thread as making comparisons with work in universities and government institutions seems a bit off the mark to me.
Finally, as far as standards of teaching and the effects that this may have upon students, well is this really an issue restricted to chain schools, or is this part and parcel of the educational pressures of being a student in Asia (not just China). I don't see any of this as specifically applying to either chain schools in general nor the EF chain which has been singled out for some reason by some members of this forum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| vikdk wrote: |
maybe my major gripe at the big chains should be this-
why do they sink the level of service to such a low level when they operate here in China - for example where do EF's least qualified employees work - isn't that in china - dont you have to be a qualified teacher to work in their outlets in other parts of the world.
|
Nothing but hot air and unsubstantiated opinion from a self-proclaimed but highly incompotent pseudo-China hand!
Whether you have a high degree or not doesn't in the least matter in most schools for the simple reson that your CHinese employers and, indeed, even the parents of your learners won't expect you to be ahead of their own teachers.
While certs are always welcome your savviness, know-how, professionalism won't be recognised as such by Chinese. You have to take THEIR orders, not the other way around. Under such conditions one wonders why have an academic track record at all?
Which is not what I endorse - but it's the reality here.
So, why then posit that chain schools "sink" (vkdk probably meant "lower") the English standards of CHinese learners?
This is putting the horse at the back of the cart! The first reason why chain schools are here is because the public schools signally fail in their duty to teach English.
Their standards can never be "lowered"!
Chain schools in fact offer an alternative to the established and ineffectual received teaching methods of public schools and Chinese pseudo-training centres.
I would repeat my post in, I believe, an other thread, saying that many international chain schools - LINGUAPHONE for example - do make a significant difference - a difference for the better (which should go without saying). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Louras
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:08 am Post subject: STOP!!!! |
|
|
| Please refrain from giving Clarkie and ahole any more woodies. I've been away 2 weeks and it's all the same grovel. Please STOP!!! I vote for new people to abuse!!! Calling the same boring old farts boring is soooo boring |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:44 am Post subject: Chain schools in China |
|
|
Quoting oneself is funny, but it does make kinda sense here.
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
I am reposting my earlier question as I believe that it is a valid question in this discussion but it has so far gone unanswered.
| clark.w.griswald wrote: |
| I would be interested in seeing if those who suggest that chain schools should be avoided could offer alternative suggestions? So yes, we have heard the many opinions as to what this specific school does wrong, so lets here some information about specific schools that these people believe do everything right? |
I don't know why this thread is concentrating on one particular chain school considering that they are pretty much the same.
................... |
Reading too much or participating in too many discussions (some little clue about) might create "blanks" in one's head with all due respect. Or maybe it might create a kinda ignorance since one might be bias.
Here is a good point that one forum user has posted on the first page
| Quote: |
frank d wrote:
Often the problem with chain schools is that they aren't actually chains. For example, Canilx Modern English (where I worked two years ago in Nanjing) started out as a group of satellite schools based out of Beijing, but soon the owner/creator sold the Canilx name to anyone apparently for the right price. Within a year, the quality of Canilx schools varied wildly from city to city. Canilx Shanghai recently went bust after several months of non-payment of rent. I read on another FT website that teachers and students were forced to evacuate the premises immediately by the disgruntled landlord. |
Peace to all, good luck in franchised centers in China
And
Cheers and beers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Louras
Joined: 24 Nov 2004 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:33 am Post subject: Rog and clarkie |
|
|
| Loggerheads!!!!!!!!!!! Let's get it on!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
draigoch
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A few observations on the whole EF thing :
I'm not going to slag off all EF Schools, because I certainly have not worked at them all by any stretch of the imagination. My count is two. From my understanding there are some which are very good.
However, we all know there are bad ones. The one I last worked at, EF Yiwu, is appalling. I seriously urge anyone thinking of going there to reconsider fast. The local franchise management are the worst management team I have ever had the misfortune to work for. Incompetent and dishonest, both the owner and the Centre Manager.
I also worked at EF Shenyang, which is generally very good. The Centre Manager has her own particular idiocies (generally on the academic side and usually concerned with giving parents of students 'face'), but, on the general treatment of teachers and looking after their well-being that school is pretty good. Something which can never be said of EF Yiwu.
The problem as I see it with EF in China is the franchise system. They frequently compare themselves to McDonald's (why anyone would want to compare themselves with the most hated burger chain in the world is beyond me, but there you go). However, to McDonald's credit, in China, until very recently, they ran all the branches centrally, not as franchises, to ensure and build a quality standard. Now that this standard is established they have started franchising. This is what EF should have done. By not doing that, EFBC is left with schools of varying quality.
It might help, and I know Gregor will disagree with me on this, if EFBC was prepared to withdraw some of the franchises from the worst schools. Gregor will argue, as he has done personally with me, that the owners would just re-open under a new name and carry on as before. He may be right about that. However, I would argue that if it happened there would be enough loss of face for the owner, and threat of loss of face for other EF franchises which are abusing the name that they would start falling into some kind of line.
BTW - Just to say that Gregor is right in that he certainly is not a "Company man" when it comes to EF. I know him pretty well, we have our disagreements on certain ideas, but he's never been a greasy pole climber in my eyes. Just a good bloke.
And just to say again - EF Yiwu, STAY AWAY. Unless you fancy living in a flat which is colder than the outside in winter (oh, and is slap-bang in the middle of a red-light district), having a Centre Manager who will lie and lie and lie again and then blame you for his own incompetence, an owner who will only open his wallet for himself and his pals and be forced to teach various off-site courses which break EFBC's own rules. That's just a little of what I and my colleagues were forced to endure there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:35 am Post subject: Chain schools in China |
|
|
Gee a revived thread on franchises in China that’s gotten into EF cr*p again.
A good post above I must say.
There are some great EF centers and there are some disastrous ones in China.
I’ve worked at a fantastic one once in 2002. I started “so happy” there, but 6 months later the same year it turned “so quickly around”. In a flash of a light the school lost its students, teachers, Director of Studies, Center Manager (fired), its building (had to move to school) as well as its reputation. I got paid less than my contract said, so I left for another farce EF center. By the way, that school has not recovered since and neither has the one I followed up with. Blah, blah, blah…. What I am saying is that even a great EF center can turn easily into a “hell” so quickly in front of your eyes. Why? Because all its franchisees (some insufficiently educated) are under little or no control from the EF English First Head Office. Any EF Head Office around the world has little or no influence on EF centers in China and take my word for it.
So, do you wish to gamble? Fine! Then, join an EF center in China.
Peace to us all
And
Cheers and beers
________________________________________________________
Why some participate in unfamiliar to them topics or discussions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: Chain schools in China |
|
|
| englishgibson wrote: |
| I�ve worked at a fantastic one once in 2002. I started �so happy� there, but 6 months later the same year it turned �so quickly around�. In a flash of a light the school lost its students, teachers, Director of Studies, Center Manager (fired), its building (had to move to school) as well as its reputation. I got paid less than my contract said, so I left for another farce EF center. By the way, that school has not recovered since and neither has the one I followed up with. |
So let me get this right. Some EF schools are good and some aren't. The two that you worked at were good when you arrived there, but then went downhill while you were there and have not recovered since. Is there a pattern to this
Just having a go at you EG as we haven't been at loggerheads for a while  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Is there a pattern to this |
seems to be an asian pattern - was reading on another site about the digusting EF mess in Thailand - these companies have no control over what goes on, while helping the exploiters suck in the gullable through a smoke screen of brand name.
You ready to rumble Clarkie  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
englishgibson
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 4345
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:19 am Post subject: Chain schools in China |
|
|
Hey Clarkie. It’s been a while hasn’t it? And you still get into this EF stuff, don’cha?
I see that you’ve been quite attentive above and read my post really carefully. We all have our ambitions and mine have presented me with opportunities at EF. Both EF centers above mentioned in my post lured me into “deals”, which I now call “deals with the devil”. My choices were “no way or highway” and I chose the second one. A “pattern” there Clarkie? I don’t think so. But it’s a nice try, I must say.
Speaking of that EF “pattern”, Thailand’s one mess, Indonesia where the Indonesian business groups buy EF franchise licenses then dictate their demands to the EF Head Office is another one, and then there is China. What’s alarming is that the actual EF product made by some smart and hardworking individuals brought to those EF centers is often “bloody” tainted in actual classrooms then. And those same smart and hardworking individuals do not seem to care as much as long as they get paid. With regards to those “academics” in the EF classrooms, they often just “come and go” whether it is in Thailand, Indonesia or China. What bothers me and as Vikdk has pointed out above is that many get lured to the EF franchise based on false expectations of an International educational institution with hopes that are often faded away due to the greedy, unethical, self-centered and dishonest franchisees.
Peace to all of us guys
And
Cheers and beers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|