|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:27 am Post subject: Re: Quality private language learning: Does it exist in Jap |
|
|
| luckbox wrote: |
| Jim, you've really hit the nail on the head here. Companies seem set on the notion that they can't compete and sell their product unless fun is a top priority. English is as much a fashion and status commodity in Japan as it is an educational commodity, perhaps moreso. And that's what I feel many of the privates are selling: the coolness, the image factor, the fun of being someway associated with the ideal international everyperson (kokusaijin). It's almost a kind of corporate, lingusistic branding. English packaged and sold as hyper-kawaii, purple bunnies singing catchy English jingles, followed by some successful "graduate" proudly uttering some near-Japlish phrase (obviusly being read off a cue card). Didn't the NOVA commercial song actually make top of the J-pops charts a couple years ago? I recall my kids singing it (in earnest) at my junior high school at the time. I'm not reducing English education to this issue, but what you say above sure is a very real part of the big picture. |
I just did student evaluations where students write comments in Japanese on what they thought of the class.
At the bottom some wrote 'jugyo ga tanoshikatta' or 'tanoshii jugyo desita' etc (it was an enjoyable class)
Although i was gratified that students were 'satisfied' and got something out of it I couldnt help feeling even at university we are no more than over paid entertainers and in some cases teachers jobs depend on positive evaluations by students. Some said they had trouble with listening and the progress of the lesson etc and students are supposed to work up a sweat in learning a foreign language but where does one draw a line between entertainment and actual learning? Do classes have to be dull and boring to be called productive?
How do you get students not disposed to learning English interested in the lesson when its not 'fun'? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luckbox
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 180
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: Quality private language learning: Does it exist in Jap |
|
|
| PAULH wrote: |
| (...) but where does one draw a line between entertainment and actual learning? Do classes have to be dull and boring to be called productive? How do you get students not disposed to learning English interested in the lesson when its not 'fun'? |
I guess these are the 64 dollar questions, to which I have no real answers. As Jim mentioned in his post, there's one inescapable fact about learning language: it's hard work, it's not all fun. There's no way around it. All the purple bunnies and jingles in the world ain't gonna change that fact. The problem I see is that the issue of fun or entertainment is so key to the packaging and marketing of eikaiwa in Japan that it dictates lesson planning and pedagogical method, and in the end it dictates the results, which are sub-par. I don't write my lesson plans, I follow the ones set out by my company, and do what I can to inject useful grammatical points and extras when possible. But essentially my hands are tied. I'll admit I'm not a good teacher. I think the real skilled ESL teachers out there are excellent at filling in the gaps and educating as well as entertaining. But really skilled English/ESL teachers in Japan are few and far between because they aren't offered the incentives come, or stay here.
It's clear to me that in my case, my company is not selling English education, but English/Gaijin entertainment and an ideal image of English & internationalization. They have a vested interest in keeping their students (read: customers) happy. By injecting too much hard work into the equation, they lose customers. It's a business, first and foremost. The really serious students I've had understand this and seek out alternatives, and they are the ones that actually end up learning, and speaking better English. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrCAPiTUL
Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 232 Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a question to ask the University staff at this point, because Paul brought up an interesting point when he said he still felt like an overpaid entertainer, at time.
My friend in Nagoya, who grew up there and now is in the University, she said that once kids get out of high school that hard work ethic drops substantially. She said in college, kids usually are more equivalent to an American H.S. in terms of maturity and the stuff they do (note, i'm not talking about graduate students). She said her peers are lazy and whenever there is a group project, you'll have one person who does all the work whilst the rest are busy dating, trying to find work, etc.
Through your experiences, do you find university work to be more challenging, as a result? What do you do to get your students engaged? Or, do you even have this problem? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've only just begun teaching in a university. My students are all science majors, by the way. There is no liberal arts program at my uni, so one would imagine that most students have a fairly serious sense of studying in general here.
Most of my classes have been for 1st year students, which means they still have a high school mentality about them, but I just finished teaching at a private HS, so I CAN see a bit of a difference. The biggest thing that strikes me at this point is that the uni students, for the most part, come to me if they have missed a class (or are about to) and ask for the assignment they missed. This never EVER happened in my high school, whether I taught 1st, 2nd, or 3rd year students there. NEVER.
Do I put the "fear of God" in them? I don't know. I try to instill in them a sense of responsibility from the start, and I make it clear that without a certain amount of work, they won't pass the class. Maybe the difference is not so much in attitude as it is in the simple fact that they can hardly flunk in high school. Even the student with the lowest grades gets a million chances to make up his losses, and even after that, if he has failed to come through, at my high school the staff STILL held a meeting to vote on what to do next, despite giving the student a millionth "last chance". (I might add that a couple of years ago, it boiled down to 4 or 5 students having failing grades, yet the image of the school seemed to be on the line, and failing that many was unthinkable. They gave the students the simplest assignment possible -- copy in English a few paragraphs without making a single mistake. Yet, even with this simple task, a few kids screwed it up, but the school passed all but one.)
This may lead to a discussion of the differences between universities and their policies in flunking students, but this seems to be a major point to me. That is, do they realize they CAN flunk in university?
In pair work or small groups, I DO see kids goofing off in my uni. I casually yet firmly tell them to cut it out. If this persists again, and it has, I let them know that their grade depends on using English in class. One of my co-workers maintains a daily list of 10 points for each student, and they earn the points only if he sees them being productive in the class. They hear from him if he thinks they aren't. These 10 points (x 15 for the number of lessons over a semester) add up to a significant part of their grade, and they know this. It's not easy to manage, but it's ONE way to prod the slackers.
Since most of my classes are with 1st year students, I can only relate what others have told me about other students at my uni. They say that the 2nd year students are the toughest, because they don't have that fresh-faced naivete about entering a completely different institution anymore, and they know what they can get away with. I guess I'll have to see if this is true for myself soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski, telling the students they can fail is a MAJOR incentive for them to come to class. Most do not want to repeat and its only when they get a failing grade do they realise you are serious. I will tell students verbally in the first class and give them a printed handout in Japanese of class 'rules' for passing the class. this includes grading, attendance, tests and use of phones etc.
I mentioned before that i teach a repeater class of students that failed their classes last year. theres about forty in the class. I had problems as many just bolted after I took the roll.
I knocked that on the head in the next class by telling them (in Japanese) that I already graduated and dont need to pass the class, THEY do. The lesson is for their benefit, not mine. They need to change their attitude if they want to get a passing grade. I now take attendance once at the beginning and once at the end of the class. The slackers seem to turn up more regularly now as they know I can fail them a second time and they are simply wasting their own time. If they show me doctor's slips I allow it but not if they are plain skipping class.
Students soon realise the buck and grade stops with you, not with a Japanese teacher or a JTE etc . Glenski, I know you were in a private school but at Rits they werent scared of you as they know they will graduate HS regardless.
I teach a second year class, they are not as 'bushy tailed' as first year's but its an elective class, i.e. they choose to take English and for the most part they are motivated and interested in English. You get a few slackers playing with phones and sleeping etc but i will usually give them a prod etc. second years are fun as they know a bit of English and if they have had a good teacher will let their hair down a bit. They are less inhibited and more willling to have a go. I will also try and include all students and at least make an effort to talk to them individually at least once. get them working on pairs or in small group work and try to mix up their speaking partners.
Last edited by PAULH on Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:04 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MrCAPiTUL wrote: |
| Through your experiences, do you find university work to be more challenging, as a result? What do you do to get your students engaged? Or, do you even have this problem? |
I have never taught in a high school so i dont know the problems that Glenski has had. Coming from an eikaiwa though, the classes are bigger, you get mixed levels of students and depending on the university or even the department motivation levels differ also.
I teach part time at a 'first-tier' private university in Kansai and have also taught at the women's college. I now work FT at second-tier university. Kids are pretty average, not dumb but not that bright either. One of my students failed his first choice (where i work) as well as Kansai university and now is at my school.
Uni classes are not difficult once you know what you are doing but you have to set the tone of your class at the beginning. If you are soft at the beginning students will milk it for all its worth and take liberties. Set a firm tone, ease up when necessary but be prepared to crack the whip. Students need boundaries and they have to know what yours are.
I am on a mailing list where teachers experience all kinds of problems from their schools. they are undermined by their own departments, subject to harassment and have classes taken away. Some want to teach culture and content classes but the university only wants to give EFL classes. One teacher I know was verbally and physically assaulted by a student. You have to be able to deal with all kinds of situations.
How to get students engaged? Make students understand why they have to do what you want them to, make sure they understand how to do the tasks and exercises. Lessons can be 'fun' but they must have an educational purpose. If students dont know why they are doing it, its too difficult for them they will lose interest. You can make even boring material interesting by applying different techniques (cloze exercises, Q & A, looking for vocabulary.
PS I have a private student who teaches English PT at a private women's university. When I met her she was teaching 19th century quotations and literature to a bunch of non-English majors. they werent really interested even though she was passionate about literature. I got her to understand the class shouldnt always be about what you want to do and now shes learning how to teach using communicative ELT techniques rather than 'chalk and talk'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tokyo story
Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Glenski wrote: |
| For starters, where do you get your information that English teachers and Japanese teachers are the same? |
I wasn't comparing Japanese and Native English teachers. I was comparing foreigners working as English teachers to every other type of employment in Japan. Considering that Native English teachers are by and large NOT professionals, but instead employed on the basis of having a native skill, the job opportunities and pay are far better than: a) most working class Japanese are able to get & b) significantly better than Japanese are offered in my country (New Zealand.) My point is this -- native English speakers are able to come to this country and make enough money to lead a comfortable lifestyle. This is not possible for a lot of countries and a lot of nationalities. I don't see the need to be treated like a foreign dignitary.
I'd hate for anyone to be scared away from Japan because they read that conditions are getting worse. I've met a few long term teachers here and there are pitfalls, no doubt, but those teachers know that they are no longer employable in their home countries and that Japan is one place that will keep employing them.
As for bonuses and everything else... They sound great, but they're never enough and get sucked up quickly...
| Quote: |
| Cheaper housing? Where did you get this idea? Many Japanese continue to live with their parents into their 30s and pay little to no rent. There is no lower rent for foreigners last time I checked. |
My girlfriend lives at home. It's not as sweet a deal as people make out. Foreigners can get good deals, because companies forgo guarantors, key money, etc. Japanese, too, but rarely in the same neighbourhoods. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|