| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
When a society adopts that cheap method of treating a disability (ADHD for example) - good behaviour through threat of pain then we can understand - how this type of mainstream mentality can come to breed itself into far more serious manifestions than stinging smacks - the "special" child institution of communist Romania for example were expert in this doctrine (by the way ADHD and many other dissabilities never existed in such countries because they were hid away behind some grey walls with locked doors).
Mydnight I sympathise with your situation - I have also worked with attention defficiency kids - but know full well they can't thrive in normal classes without special individual attention that teaches them ways to cope with their individual problems in relation to what is expected of them within society - learning tricks to lead a normal a life as possible. Hitting is not a good answer to this need because I've seen these kids in their teen years - that hyper activity can easily turn into something very nasty with a bit of brawn behind it - and all that hitting is just training them to respond to their future problems in a violent way - after all every human needs to pratice defending themselves in situations it percieves as being one of potential danger that will result in pain - that is unless all their proverbial personal spirit has been knocked out of them
But in china - when the parent says nothing is wrong with their child, and the school's are desperatly greedy for all the income they can scrape together- and you have the already massive duties of coping with other so-called normal kids of the class - well it's really difficult to hold to my namby-pamby principles (if not practicaly impossible). The expert and common sense really are disempowered by this system. Mydnight have you ever tried to talk to other teachers about this problem - in any practical sense surely a total waste of time - but I would be just interested in hearing what they would say, and how they view the problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vikdk
Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1676
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
By the way I forgot to suggest an alternative strategy for a hyper active child within the restricions of the chinese classroom - try to get an assistant to firmly but gently always place the child back on the chair - no exceptions if the rule is that they must sit - but remember always be there to give approriate praise when the child obeys the rule for a good amount of time (for example 5 mins is a long time for a kindy age child) - infact you can make it into a good cop/bad cop thing - with the kid always wanting to please the good cop and not wanting the bad cop - the assistant - to come over and make them sit. The bad cop in this scenario should never hit the kid
Okay I'm off on a bike holiday now  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steppenwolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 1769
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is self-evident that vikdk's droning on and lecturing is addressed at himself and has little value for those who teach in schools as compared to kindergartens.
There is nothing wrong with vikdk offering insight from a perceived higher level of pedagogical understanding since that is what he/she claims to have due to having studied at a dedicated preschool educators' institution.
But he started this tirade first of all to take cheap shots at posters he or she has taken a pathological dislike to, not in order to discuss pedagogical issues. That is where the problem stinks.
I have never had to resort to physical violence or to any other form of unusual punishment; I have a relatively calm mind in situations of anarchy or riot - I once stood my ground when 96 Tamil refugees went on a rampage in a refugee camp. My superior got a few bruises but not me, and I didn't have to pretend agreeing with the refugees.
In a classroolm you are a number of professionals all rolled into one - among others you are a confidante, a parent of sorts, even a friend, but you are above all a subject teacher with a work load that you have to deliver on time. Unruly behaviour can put you back on your schedule and parents won't forgive you if their kid falls behind as a consequence.
We as FTs are also labouring under significantly more challenging conditions since we are not allowed to mete out any justice of our own; I for example had to deal with unruly 14-year olds on a regular basis. My complaints were listened to on the first day when I went to talk about them to my superiors; when I complained again two weeks later I was listened to - again, but no action was taken either. On my third attempt at setting things right I was coldly ignored.
Trouble was that the students were a challenge to all except their head teacher; my Chinese colleagues had more power since they could punish them while I could not. Once I watched as another English teacher - a Chiense one, obviously - confiscated a mobile phone from a student, causing that boy to cry. She then hollered at him for 20 minutes, then told the recalcitrant boy that she would now call his mother using his mobile phone - which she did.
It goes without saying that boy got a serious knockback with the full support from his own parents. Is confiscating a mobile phone less "degrading" than getting a relatively painless slap on his face? Considering that he cried uncontrollably I would say he lost quite a bit of his precious "face"...
Let's not forget that we only see these little brats and their darling friends once or twice a week but their Chinese teachers see them more regularly; this informs their behavioral traits - they develop less respect adn they act with less restraint.
Also, unlike vikdk in his kindy classes, we don't normally have TAs. We are often left to our own devices. We also never can exchange observations with our Chiense colleagues because no meetings are institutionalised.
Thus we are at a serious disadvantage. How then can we set ourselves up as restraining agents that stop physical abuse by Chinese teachers to the detriment of our students??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I once stood my ground when 96 Tamil refugees |
were these tigers..I had a long relationship.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steppenwolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 1769
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cj750 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I once stood my ground when 96 Tamil refugees |
were these tigers..I had a long relationship.... |
Silly question! There were Tamil Tigers among them, to be sure, but the majority were not members of that "liberation mnovement"; in fact some self-proclaimed members of the Tamil Tigers regularly visited that camp to collect membership dues. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| There were Tamil Tigers among them |
The Sinhalese and the Tamil never mix....they have set them apart from the Sri Lankans who are Sinhalese and are largely Buddhist while the Tamil are Hindus....they would never be in a camp together...
| Quote: |
| in fact some self-proclaimed members of the Tamil Tigers regularly visited that camp to collect membership dues |
What camp was this....Camp Roger? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steppenwolf
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 1769
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cj750 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| There were Tamil Tigers among them |
The Sinhalese and the Tamil never mix....they have set them apart from the Sri Lankans who are Sinhalese and are largely Buddhist while the Tamil are Hindus....they would never be in a camp together...
| Quote: |
| in fact some self-proclaimed members of the Tamil Tigers regularly visited that camp to collect membership dues |
What camp was this....Camp Roger? |
Silly girl you, "cj750". Can you read English? If yes, why do you refer to me as "Roger"? My name is not 'Roger".
Second question: who said Sinhalese and Tamils were "mixed together"? Certainly not me nor that "Roger" character! Are you inventing things? Why? Experimenting on your BMW 750 with new fuel types based on alcohol that you have to test on yourself first?
For your information: my employer was a nominally Christian charity that paid my salary from tax receipts turned over to them by the municipality in which I lived and worked at that time.
They were in charge of running refugee camps because the state didn't have the resources to cope with the heavy influx of African, Pakistani, Tamil and other refugees.
I stated very unambiguously they were TAMILS, not SINHALESE. That the two ethnicities were, and still are, in conflict with each other has not eluded me.
In fact, I read up quite a bit about their war, a civil war.
My camp housed Tamils only, no other ethnicities, and most definitely no Sinhalese (of whom no refugee status seekers were known to exist).
And a good many of those Tamils were not Hindus; they were Christians (I had two "John F. Kennedys in my camp, also one "Jesus" - using their "Christian" names like some exotic deocration to distin guish themselves from the rest.
The Hindu Tamils I knew took me to their improvised temples (in rented apartments). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Silly girl you, "cj750". Can you read English? If yes, why do you refer to me as "Roger"? My name is not 'Roger |
".
Silly swish that you are..can you not notice that I did not refer to you as Roger..only the Camp you purported to be at as Camp Roger.....
it was this quote that call into question your sincerity..
| Quote: |
| I once stood my ground when 96 Tamil refugees went on a rampage in a refugee camp. |
Simple question ..where was the camp....
| Quote: |
| They were in charge of running refugee camps because the state |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|