|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Symphany
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 117
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: Racism in Mexico |
|
|
Most of the discussion on this thread seems to be related to racial relation and class and cultural perception of mainly caucasian or fair-skinned foreigners.
I would like to know if anyone of African descent has any personal experience living and working in Mexico?
Do Mexicans see African Americans or Afro-Caribbeans from New York or Toronto as not real foreigners who can do the job, or have a lot of money? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike S.

Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 91 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 3:12 pm Post subject: Morenas Bonitas |
|
|
| I think that some of the most beautiful women that I�ve ever seen anywhere have been Mexican morenas. But you never see them as models in the store catalogs, like you see African-American women in the ones in the US. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:50 am Post subject: Re: Morenas Bonitas |
|
|
| Mike S. wrote: |
| I think that some of the most beautiful women that I�ve ever seen anywhere have been Mexican morenas. But you never see them as models in the store catalogs, like you see African-American women in the ones in the US. |
I think your observation is right on. It's a perfect example of how what we call racism functions in contemporary Mexico. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not that I disagree, but is it really racist? I don't see much difference in the US or Canada. Our countries are far more varied in racial makeup, but you'll still only see what's popularly considered the 'most beautiful' in advertising or pop culture, along whatever marketing lines you can think of. Mexico does the same.
When has Jane Q. Frumpy from Peoria, Illinois ever made the cover of Covergirl magazine? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Guy Courchesne wrote: |
Not that I disagree, but is it really racist? I don't see much difference in the US or Canada. Our countries are far more varied in racial makeup, but you'll still only see what's popularly considered the 'most beautiful' in advertising or pop culture, along whatever marketing lines you can think of. Mexico does the same.
When has Jane Q. Frumpy from Peoria, Illinois ever made the cover of Covergirl magazine? |
It is one thing to feature only beautiful women on the covers of fashion magazines and to reject plain ones. It is quite another to categorically exclude all women belonging to a particular racial group from appearing on magazine covers, both the beautiful ones and the plain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Denness Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Guy Courchesne wrote: |
Not that I disagree, but is it really racist? I don't see much difference in the US or Canada. Our countries are far more varied in racial makeup, but you'll still only see what's popularly considered the 'most beautiful' in advertising or pop culture, along whatever marketing lines you can think of. Mexico does the same.
When has Jane Q. Frumpy from Peoria, Illinois ever made the cover of Covergirl magazine? |
You could combine this with the 'inferiority complex' thread you started if you ask me. Most advertising here is very' American' in every way. So is it surprising that they use the models they do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
From our point of view, yes I agree. But, I don't see the Mexicans as having the same awareness.
We as foreigners are going to define 'race' in very different ways from most Mexicans I think. What defines a racial group in a country that calls its own citizens mestizos? Is it class? Language? Where they live?
You and I would look and say that Mexican high society excludes all indigenous people. What makes a person indigenous exactly, if that's what we're talking about? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Denness Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Guy Courchesne wrote: |
| Is it class? |
I'm trying to think of a country that isn't firmly segragated according to class...I may need an encyclopedia!
What ingredients go into the mix to produce 'class'. This could get very complicated!
Truth be told though, I was simply commenting on the 'models' aspect. Models are usually chosen to represent what people aspire to, or are taught to aspire to.
(Not taught in my classes I might add!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike S.

Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 91 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would Barack Obama be considered a mulatto in Mexico? I think that he is one of the true ''African-Americans'' because his father was an actual native African, an his mother is an American, who happens to be white. And if any one decides that I am making racist comments here, please be aware that I will be pleased if he is elected the next president of the US. It�s interesting that if someone has any amount of ''black blood'' in the US they are automatically placed in the ''black'' or ''African-American'' category.
On a ''lighter'' note - How about the ''Gringa'' sandwich sold at taco trucks?
It reminds me of the classic Lenny Bruce bit in which he goes into an Italian delicatessan and orders a ''big Dego''. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_K
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 2041 Location: A World of my Own
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Models are usually chosen to represent what people aspire to, or are taught to aspire to. |
Made me think of the saying that you belong to the class you aspire to, not the class you were born into. My personal opinion, and I know it will be one again controversial , is that there is nothing wrong with wanting to better yourself. I hate the idea that some people have when they tell their children "Our kind of people don't do those things" or "stop dreaming, that's for other people".
However, it's difficult to aspire to be a mestizo when you are indigenous - and what's wrong with being indigenous?
| Quote: |
| I think that some of the most beautiful women that I�ve ever seen anywhere have been Mexican morenas. |
Exactly - my own wife is morena clara |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Guy Courchesne wrote: |
From our point of view, yes I agree. But, I don't see the Mexicans as having the same awareness.
We as foreigners are going to define 'race' in very different ways from most Mexicans I think. What defines a racial group in a country that calls its own citizens mestizos? Is it class? Language? Where they live?
You and I would look and say that Mexican high society excludes all indigenous people. What makes a person indigenous exactly, if that's what we're talking about? |
Guy's comments remind me of research I did some years ago while working on an MA in Latin American Studies. It revolved around a type of genre painting called "castas" paintings, popular in late Colonial-era New Spain, as Mexico was then called. Castas is a term referring to the people of varying racial mixtures, who then made of a good proportion of the population, especially in the capital. There were a good number of these classifications, and they also appeared in the official population census reports that were regularly issued by the government. One intriguing fact that has stayed with me is how certain "vecinos" appeared to change their racial category from one census to another, usually going from a lower, or darker, group to a higher, or lighter, one, based primarily on an improvement in their economic status. In other words, wealth "whitened" these people.
Another fact to keep in mind are modern ethnographic studies carried out in parts of Mexico where there are large numbers of indigenous peoples, such as Chiapas. The ethnographers have learned that whether someone is referred to as "ind�gena" or "ladino" (similar to "mestizo") depends upon how and where they live, rather than solely upon physical characteristics like skin color. An ind�gena lives in a traditional village, speaks an Indian language in addition to Spanish or perhaps doesn't; speak Spanish at all, eats tortillas, may wear traditional clothing and so on, while a ladino lives in the town, wears western clothes, probably eats more bread than tortillas, speaks only Spanish and so on. In these communities, "race" appears to be above all a cultural construct.
The situation is much more complicated than the two examples I have mentioned, which are based on my very limited, academic knowledge of the subject, and is different, I am sure, in different parts of Mexico. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An interesting thing in Mexico is that there are scholarships for indigenous students (at all levels, primary to post-grad) but in order to qualify for such scholarships, you MUST speak an Indigenous language. But in Oaxaca some villages have completely lost their language. Village A and Village B may be only 5 miles apart, they may be extrondianirly alike in all ways, except, Village A has managed to keep their language, while the people from Village B speak only Spanish. Children from Village B are not eligible for these scholarships.
What MO described is generally true throughout Latin America. I remember in Ecuador particularly, the difference between indo, cholo, and mestizo was the way they dressed and lived, not the blood in their veins.
Last edited by MELEE on Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Melee,
Thanks for gathering up these old threads for us to read. I especially enjoyed re-reading Moon Raven's contributions - I wonder what she's up to these days...
MO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
choctawmicmac
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 18 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject: Yes, Mexicans hate gringos |
|
|
...as evidenced by the fact that, in their own culture, not just Mexican-American but really, all over Latin America, the lighter their skin the more they bend over backwards to prove in every aspect of life that they are NOT those awful hateful gringos. And there is disdain among the Mexican community of those who "pass for white" and live like white, so to speak. If their skin is so light they 'pass for white' they try as hard as they can to act and live as culturally "Mexican" as possible, living down all the stereotypes, especially the negative ones. You never see the dark-skinned ones up in the States or here in Canada and speaking only Spanish and refusing to learn English like the stereotypical ones in all the places you see on the news. All of the bad stereotypes you see on the news - those are the light-skinned ones trying hard not to be mistaken for white. Gringo is the worst thing you can call someone who's actually Mexican. Or any Latin-American country, for that matter, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Honduran, Costa Rican, etc. They all hate gringos.
This is not to say that they treat their own dark-skinned people better than the light ones. The lighter the skin down there, the better off you are, too; just like anyplace else in the world. It's just that the light-skinned ones have to "act" more "Mexican" (and all that that means) because they don't "look" it.
The racial heirarchy of skin pigmentation is true in every country that was colonised by a European country and itself originally had dark-skinned native people living in it. This rubbish is true everywhere, and still happens everywhere. Look at the Philippines - Philippinos are dark skinned, but the ones you see over here on North America are the light-skinned ones who practically look like Spaniards. Those were the ones who could scrape together the travel fare and the thousands of dollars for immigration paperwork to either Canada or the USA, and get here. What Philippinos really look like - that you will only see IN the Philippines. Not the Philippino-Americans or the Philippino-Canadians. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|