| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cangringo

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 327 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm methinks that I have used methinks for a long time and I don't know where it came from...
I do know that I picked up mayhap from the Gunslinger...
how's about we all jess tok like we wanter and it spell phonetically, we could jess start makin all da words simpler by making more contractions. We could say things like t'will and t'were.
Ok sorry, too much coffee s'mornin
Here's one for you... "I personally think"... wouldn't "I think" imply that it is you personally. I mean isn't that just redundant?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not if somebody else usually does your thinking for you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, after re-reading this thread from the original post, it becomes clear to me that NO ONE, I repeat, NOONE (spelled it different 'cuz I ain't sure which it is), is interested in learning the King's English.
BTW, I first heard "The King's English" phrase from a black Guyanese man who swore to me that the official English language was only spoken by people from Guyana, and that it was the true "King's English".
Lemme tell ya, that's REALLY stretchin' it, if any of ya have ever heard countryside Guyanese English spoken. I bet the english they learned was from Cockney pirates who tyrranized the Caribbean and claimed direct descendence from the King of England just to legitimize their crimes.
It just sounds better to me than "The Queen's English". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cangringo

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 327 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.ic.arizona.edu/~lsp/QueensEnglish.html
Go there to read about the "king's english" or the "queen's english" as it were.
On that note, it is important to learn proper english (even though there is debate as to what is proper) but it's also important to include idioms and slang related to the culture and possibly age that you are teaching.
Howzat?? I have to admit I have had a few cervezas...so hopefully this still makes sense in the morning.
One more thing..."suspension of belief" or "suspension of disbelieif"?? Too tired to give my opionions on it but discuss. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hlamb
Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Guy Courchesne wrote: |
| It is a weird mix isn't it? Almost part of the national debate on 'what is it to be Canadian?'. It is to speak like an American and write like a Brit, for the most part. . |
That's a national debate that most folks from other places have trouble understanding. My students ask me all the tiime what it is to be Canadian and they don't get it when I tell them about our national identity crisis.
[/quote] I refuse to use left-tennant though.[/quote]
Yeah, I think that's where I draw the line too! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sarliz

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 198 Location: Jalisco
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oooh! Oooh! I know one! Suspension of disbelief is correct, you usually use it to discuss your reaction to fantastical movies or plays, or other plot lines that you're going along with against rational knowledge because you've put your usual disbelief in check. It's a double-negative-style thing. When a movie doesn't properly engage you, you lose this suspension, and your disbelief returns, returning you to your usual jaded, skeptical self (this is me we're talking about here).
I can't think of a time that I've heard anyone claiming to have suspended their belief; that one doesn't make so much sense to me. "When I was 8 I suspended my belief in the Tooth Fairy,"? That would kind of imply that it's going to come back, no? Maybe it's a phrase for agnostics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cangringo

Joined: 18 Jan 2007 Posts: 327 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah yes ok, I've heard it both ways and have also seen arguments about it. Ok but I get it now I think...
You have to admit that it's a tad confusing. I mean suspension of belief to me says that you have to pretend to believe in what's being sold, you're suspending belief in what you know to be true. Now I see what you mean though, suspending your disbelief...stop disbelieving...yes...makes more sense.
Yay, now I can go argue this one with authority.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've only heard of a suspension of one's drivers license.......  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twelvetongue
Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:49 pm Post subject: Diglossia |
|
|
English, Chinese, and Arabic are all diglossic languages. The written forms and the spoken forms are on their way to becoming languages.
Slang is wonderful fun for advanced learners or as a way of making the curriculum fun for students who already have a taste for English language popular music, but it belongs on the periphery. Slang expressions are great at the flea market, but not in the boardroom.
Seeing as you're from NJ, one thing you and a speaker of King's English can agree on is that English learners should not learn to rely on rs or hs to be pronounced. I once knew a Nigerian-American (a veteran) who got her unemployment denied because a Latina social worker couldn't understand her received pronunciation. Understanding 'ain't' and y'all' as well as dropped 'hs' and 'rs' is part and parcel of fluency, just as Spanish fluency requires the ability to moderately understand Andalucian and not just Castillian Spanish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:14 pm Post subject: Re: Diglossia |
|
|
| Twelvetongue wrote: |
| English, Chinese, and Arabic are all diglossic languages. |
An interesting article on diglossia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diglossia |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:45 pm Post subject: Re: Diglossia |
|
|
| Twelvetongue wrote: |
| just as Spanish fluency requires the ability to moderately understand Andalucian and not just Castillian Spanish. |
Andalucian eh? I would have thought Cuban or Chilean.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah soon all spoken langs will be official. Give it 3 or 4 years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twelvetongue
Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:03 am Post subject: Andalusian |
|
|
| The Chilean, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Argentinean, (but not inland Mexican) Spanish is Andalusian to a certain degree, the same way Barbadian is related to Cockney and Appalachian is related to Scots.[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twelvetongue
Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Since when was C-O-C-K-N-E-Y a dirty word? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Since it contains the word C-O-C-K. I guess the posting software doesn't like roosters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|