View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Westword
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:30 am Post subject: Which jobs are good jobs?? |
|
|
I'm curious what people think are good jobs. I'm fairly new here (not an invitation to get snarky) and I'd like to know what seasoned Saudi English teachers believe to be the 'good jobs'?
I'm probably in one of that 'bad jobs' (though it's not horrible). The next job I go for I want to be pretty confident I'm putting my energies in the right direction. I'd be happy getting anything 15,000 and up....I also like the idea of teaching at a university but it doesn't have to be. I don't have an MA but I'm probably qualified for a lot of the jobs here. Ideas  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 1:31 pm Post subject: Re: Which jobs are good jobs?? |
|
|
Westword wrote: |
I'd be happy getting anything 15,000 and up....I also like the idea of teaching at a university but it doesn't have to be. I don't have an MA but I'm probably qualified for a lot of the jobs here. |
I believe you're presently with AETG. Not so good. Anyway, "good" is how you define it. But generally, direct-hire opportunities offer better benefits, pay, and/or working conditions. Not all direct-hire jobs are with universities, though that seems to be the brunt of the TEFL jobs here. Aramco is desirable, especially if you can avoid the contracting companies---if that's even possible. (There are threads about Aramco throughout this forum.) I assume there are some lucrative teaching opportunities with the Saudi military---some of the male posters can confirm if that's the case.
As for earning "15,000 and up," that's doubtful since you don't have an MA (TEFL-related is best). Also, keep in mind employers' preference for relevant MAs. As more grad-degree holders look to this region for teaching jobs, it puts you at a disadvantage. You didn't indicate your actual qualifications, but you'd need to possess some serious experience + a CELTA to compete for jobs paying even less than that. (Salaries aren't what they used to be.) However, there might just be some dream job offering big buckeroos with your name on it. Dream job... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Westword
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems to me that getting a job around 15,000+ without an MA isn't a "dream job" in the way you mean. It's obtainable, I've seen plenty of them out there. Check out the job market I think it's changing a little. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Westword wrote: |
It seems to me that getting a job around 15,000+ without an MA isn't a "dream job" in the way you mean. It's obtainable, I've seen plenty of them out there. Check out the job market I think it's changing a little. |
I earn 15,000+ but I have a relevant master's degree (included a practicum) and previous ME teaching experience. I can say that the recruitment unit where I teach is primarily interested in those with grad degrees. Relevant BA holders are next on the food chain if there aren't enough applicants with MAs. Those with non-related BAs have a very slight chance of getting hired if their experience is solid (e.g., previous experience teaching in the region). Slight chance. And they won't be getting anything close to 15,000.
But you're the one posting about salaries for BA holders. What are your qualifications (academic degree/major, TEFL cert, & specific teaching experience)? And which jobs of many are you exactly referring to? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Westword
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd rather steer away from talking about my specific qualifications and only talk about good jobs. I'm kinda hoping somebody will fill in the list below. All qualifications aside, which companies, academies, universities or institutions are considered good jobs here?
1.Aramco
2.
3.
4.
5. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem with that is that you may end up with a list of places that wouldn't hire someone with your credentials.
For instance... number one is probably ARAMCO, but direct hire, not recruiter hire. But only a small/tiny (miniscule?) percentage of ARAMCO hires are direct and these positions require the top credentials and experience. (no BA+CELTA+2 year experience need apply)
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
veiledsentiments wrote: |
The problem with that is that you may end up with a list of places that wouldn't hire someone with your credentials. |
Ditto that. Plus, there's no set, national pay scale; salaries can vary with each employer taking into account the quals of each individual employee. For example, many employers (mine included) calculate salary based on post-MA and/or post-TEFL cert teaching experience and very likely, count verified previous employment only. (Verified employment entails a signed, official letter on letterhead from each past employer confirming the employee's start/end dates, job title, etc.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sicklyman
Joined: 02 Feb 2013 Posts: 930
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
veiledsentiments wrote: |
number one is probably ARAMCO, but direct hire, not recruiter hire |
I know this is one of your favourite records veiled, but just to flesh out the picture, it is possible to work for Aramco via a contractor and have a better package than an Aramco direct hire. I know this for a fact. However, it may be about as likely for most as the chance of getting hired directly in the first place.
The only advantage that I can see for being a direct hire is that if you have family, you have the option of accommodation on the camp (which you have to pay for BTW). Even if you're single, this might still be appealing depending on how much westernisation you came here to experience.
Anyway, there are contractors and there are contractors. Let's not tar them all with the same brush. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dragonpiwo
Joined: 04 Mar 2013 Posts: 1650 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 7:53 pm Post subject: erm |
|
|
Give the guy a break...it's like the Crucible on this forum. Listen mate...I have plenty of friends who earn C$8,000/month and none of them has the MA. There are some good Aramco recruiters and companies like TQ have the odd good job....check out Petrofac too. I've got a well-paid, direct hire rotation elsewhere....it's possible but you need to build contacts.
Positive mental attitude....and don't quit. You'll get there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear dragonpiwo,
And these plenty of friends teach EFL, right?
It would be great if you could do a public service and post the names of those places where they make $96,000 a year - without even having an MA.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
sicklyman wrote: |
veiledsentiments wrote: |
number one is probably ARAMCO, but direct hire, not recruiter hire |
I know this is one of your favourite records veiled, but just to flesh out the picture, it is possible to work for Aramco via a contractor and have a better package than an Aramco direct hire. I know this for a fact. However, it may be about as likely for most as the chance of getting hired directly in the first place.
The only advantage that I can see for being a direct hire is that if you have family, you have the option of accommodation on the camp (which you have to pay for BTW). Even if you're single, this might still be appealing depending on how much westernisation you came here to experience.
Anyway, there are contractors and there are contractors. Let's not tar them all with the same brush. |
I know of teachers who have been offered direct hire ARAMCO to teach EFL - 6 figures plus free housing on the ARAMCO compound, travel, and all the other benefits normal for the Gulf. Whereas it seems from what is posted here that the contractor $8000 a month number is total package and you have to go out and find a flat.
But as with most Gulf jobs much depends on your CV.
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dragonpiwo
Joined: 04 Mar 2013 Posts: 1650 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 5:35 am Post subject: erm |
|
|
There's a well-known drilling company Jon and then there's Aramco. Just outside Saudi you have Dyncorp and another large oil company based in Basra....who pay more actually...I know as they offered me a job 2 months a go. Alas, the contract was too short and I already have a cushy rotation. BAe are currently paying up near that with free housing and you can get in without an MA. So Jon there you go. Rattled off a few names right there.
This board seems to be hogged by a few self-proclaimed gurus, who seem to have nothing constructive to say and lack wit....as the attempts at humour clearly show. Some haven't even been to the KSA in decades.
If you want to work in a uni, you'll probably need an MA...but I know people who have such jobs and don't...KFUPM Jon.
It's pot luck.....I certainly don't wanna waste any money on an MA and am happy in my job for life...on rotation...living on the beach mostly....on a dollop of loot. Screw development..after 18 years I know enough to teach Arabs better than most....and keep myself updated using the net....like modern people do. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Westword
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
dragonpiwo,
Thanks for the good ideas and positive outlook. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JustinC
Joined: 15 Mar 2013 Posts: 138 Location: The Land That Time Forgot
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
DYNCORP offered me a job two months ago, it seemed too good to be true (9000 Euros a month) so I checked out their details. The address they gave in London has history as being used for Nigerian scams. So I replied, asking what the job specs were. I received another offer about a week later which was worded differently but didn't address my question. I replied to that, asking about the details of the role and received another email which was similar to the first two. Any other emails they send go immediately to my junk folder.
They actually gave the address as their lawyers' office, who needed my passport sending to them to clear with some authority; British Intelligence or some such. The email and contract were fairly well-worded but there were discrepancies towards the end of both. There's no way I will send my passport unless the address has been confirmed by the country's embassy first.
Westword it's difficult to get reliable recommendations online, who's to say the poster recommending a job isn't involved with recruitment? You would be better off fishing for offers and then checking out their validity, after the offer but before you get on a plane. Even then there are no guarantees. Caveat emptor. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dragonpiwo
Joined: 04 Mar 2013 Posts: 1650 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 7:48 am Post subject: ahem |
|
|
There was a Dyncorp scam you are right but the oil company which offered me $15,000 a month or a 28/28 rotation certainly wasn't as I has 2 interviews and rang the guy out there.
Back to the OP...there are good jobs but they are rare and you certainly don't need to get an MA to get 'em. I specialised in the oil field work...started in 2001 and that's where the best dosh is....and if you get a rotation, the best holidays. I refuse to do an Ma as it's simply a waste of memory in my nut chip.
We look at the experience people have when we get the CVs at recruitment time. We'd rather have John with 5 years experience teaching in the oil field with his CELTA than James who's got his Ma and 10 years in Mexico and Korea. We also look at non-academic stuff as we need someone who looks like a good fit profile-wise. The last thing we need in a 'hard' place is some know-it-all prima donna who feels entitled cos he can rattle off Skiiner...Harmer...Chomsky...Prahbu or whoever. Anyone who likes PFC for example, is in straight away .
Why oh why does anyone need a Masters to teach this lot? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|