View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Agamemnon
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 Posts: 34
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
grahamb

Joined: 30 Apr 2003 Posts: 1945
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:29 am Post subject: Hate words |
|
|
Totally. It seems that completely and absolutely have become redundant in the land of the free. Possibly the fault of Bill and Ted:
Bill: It is indeed a pleasure to introduce to you a gentleman we picked up in medieval Mongolia in the year 1269.
Ted: Please welcome, the very excellent barbarian...
Ted, Bill: ...MR. GENGHIS KHAN!
[All the students applaud wildly for Khan]
Ted: This is a dude who, 700 years ago, totally ravaged China, and who, we were told, 2 hours ago, totally ravaged Oshman's Sporting Goods.
Captain Logan: [Being possessed by Dead Ted] Whoa. Okay, dudes... Oh, I mean, fellow policemen. My son, Ted "Theodore" Logan, and his friend Bill S. Preston, Esquire, have been murdered and replaced by evil robots from the future.
Dead Bill: You totally did it dude.
Captain Logan: [as Dead Ted] I totally possessed my dad! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tudor
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Couldn't be bothered watching the video - if it had been an article, I'd have read it - but I also completely and absolutely abhor "awesome".
It's so over-used nowadays that it simply has no effect anymore. I hear people describe the most mundane events as "awesome" such as lending somebody a pencil or passing them something. I wonder what word these cretins would use if they were to go to the Niagara Falls or experience something genuniely worthy of the word. They'd probably still say "awesome" or, even worse, "totally awesome dude/bro/man/blood etc". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"iconic" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
likwid_777

Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 411 Location: NA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Awkward"... Surely borne out of social ineptitude, a result of the computer based nexus of socialising. It's not "awkward", you just can't handle it... haha. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
grahamb

Joined: 30 Apr 2003 Posts: 1945
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:06 pm Post subject: Pet hates |
|
|
I totally hate the way issues has gained a negative connotation in recent years. What's wrong with saying problems? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HLJHLJ
Joined: 06 Oct 2009 Posts: 1218 Location: Ecuador
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll add super to awesome, e.g. "the test was 'super' difficult", it puts my teeth on edge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Janiny

Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While I can deal with 'grow' as in 'grow our company' because it makes some sense in terms of sticking to the original meaning, I dislike it because it seems to me those who you use it learned it from Fox News or some other less than semi-literate media giant.
The word I really hate is 'impacted'. I have always thought, 'impact' was a noun. I don't get why people just can't use 'affected' or 'influenced' when they say 'impacted'. I'm sure they know these words too.
'Impacted' can be an adjective to describe the condition of one's wisdom teeth or what a meteor might do, but fails as a synonym for 'affected' - a perfectly good word that needs no replacing. When people say 'impacted' I think of crushing violence. It's lacks affected's light touch. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Janiny

Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HLJHLJ wrote: |
I'll add super to awesome, e.g. "the test was 'super' difficult", it puts my teeth on edge. |
I get you, but worse than 'super' is 'hyper'. it's like they wanted to trump 'supermarket' in shopper appeal, so they thought, "Hmm...what's bigger than 'super?", and they came up with 'hyper'.
But 'hyper' means 'over' not 'more than', and makes no sense. Also, it puts me in mind of hypertension or hyperactivity. Neither of these ameliorate the enjoyment of going out shopping. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
steki47
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 1029 Location: BFE Inaka
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
"trending" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
pro-active - I mean, active is active. It's such an "over-hyped" buzzword.
Or, if you see pro-active as a vital addition to the language, then let's have a pro-passive. too.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JoeKing
Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 519
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny you should mention this word. The local news broadcast I watched tossed that word around at least three or four times in a single thirty minute broadcast the other day and not once did I feel the person or thing they were describing merited the use. "Alice" from The Brady Bunch, iconic ??? Ok, if you say so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tudor
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 339
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
steki47 wrote: |
"trending" |
Good call. I'd add "viral" to that as well. It's as if some people think the entire world is obsessed by some article or video on the internet simply because they are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Janiny

Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 199
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
johnslat wrote: |
pro-active - I mean, active is active. It's such an "over-hyped" buzzword.
Or, if you see pro-active as a vital addition to the language, then let's have a pro-passive. too.
Regards,
John |
Why not be even more pro-active and have anti-passive.
The state legislature made several anti-passive decision this last session, and they vow to do the same in the coming session.
Sure it sounds like it means the opposite of passive, but pro-active is similarly confusing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Normalcy.
Whatever happened to normality? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|