View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 9:31 am Post subject: American accent closer to original British accent |
|
|
Say what??? Oh no, they di'ent!
Why Do Americans and Brits Have Different Accents?
by Natalie Wolchover, Life Science | January 09, 2012
Source: http://www.livescience.com/33652-americans-brits-accents.html
In 1776, whether you were declaring America independent from the crown or swearing your loyalty to King George III, your pronunciation would have been much the same. At that time, American and British accents hadn't yet diverged. What's surprising, though, is that Hollywood costume dramas get it all wrong: The Patriots and the Redcoats spoke with accents that were much closer to the contemporary American accent than to the Queen's English.
It is the standard British accent that has drastically changed in the past two centuries, while the typical American accent has changed only subtly.
Traditional English, whether spoken in the British Isles or the American colonies, was largely "rhotic." Rhotic speakers pronounce the "R" sound in such words as "hard" and "winter," while non-rhotic speakers do not. Today, however, non-rhotic speech is common throughout most of Britain. For example, most modern Brits would tell you it's been a "hahd wintuh."
It was around the time of the American Revolution that non-rhotic speech came into use among the upper class in southern England, in and around London. According to John Algeo in "The Cambridge History of the English Language" (Cambridge University Press, 2001), this shift occurred because people of low birth rank who had become wealthy during the Industrial Revolution were seeking ways to distinguish themselves from other commoners; they cultivated the prestigious non-rhotic pronunciation in order to demonstrate their new upper-class status.
"London pronunciation became the prerogative of a new breed of specialists — orthoepists and teachers of elocution. The orthoepists decided upon correct pronunciations, compiled pronouncing dictionaries and, in private and expensive tutoring sessions, drilled enterprising citizens in fashionable articulation," Algeo wrote.
The lofty manner of speech developed by these specialists gradually became standardized — it is officially called "Received Pronunciation" — and it spread across Britain. However, people in the north of England, Scotland and Ireland have largely maintained their traditional rhotic accents.
Most American accents have also remained rhotic, with some exceptions: New York and Boston accents have become non-rhotic. According to Algeo, after the Revolutionary War, these cities were "under the strongest influence by the British elite."
(End of article) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2014 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seen this one before.
There is s lot of truth in this article but it is marred by some lazy generalisations and by a possible underlying claim that American English is somehow closer to purer English than what is spoken today in England |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rostom

Joined: 16 Apr 2014 Posts: 102 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sparks
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 632
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Otterman Ollie
Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 1067 Location: South Western Turkey
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I find it odd and and yet significant that those who choose to live across the pond (away from the country where the mother tongue first sprang forth) have a great deal of difficulty dealing with those regional accents unique to our green and pleasant land.
Whereas, when we venture forth, (and fifth) we are able to decipher and understand the gibberish that passes for the American way of speaking, American it may be, but English, especially the British variety, I really don't think so! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Agamemnon
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hear, hear old chap! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LPKSA
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 211
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Otterman Ollie wrote: |
I find it odd and and yet significant that those who choose to live across the pond (away from the country where the mother tongue first sprang forth) have a great deal of difficulty dealing with those regional accents unique to our green and pleasant land.
Whereas, when we venture forth, (and fifth) we are able to decipher and understand the gibberish that passes for the American way of speaking, American it may be, but English, especially the British variety, I really don't think so! |
This is quite an idiotic statement. Considering how English wouldn't be "English" without German among other languages coming before it. Why do some British ESL teachers get so, well, arrogant while lacking the circuitry in understanding from where their language originates? Half the UK doesn't speak proper English anyway. Hate on it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
likwid_777

Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 411 Location: NA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aussies too. It sounds so dainty when the Americans say words like "shark". It's a bloody tiger shaahk, mate. Haha. Even as I sit here now and pronounce the "r" in a word like "dark", I truly sound like an American, even without trying to put on the accent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
" shaahk" - that's how many Bostonians (MA) say it. We also add an "r" to words: Cuber, Africer.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Agamemnon
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LPKSA,
I think you will find that not only a bit of German but also bits of French and Indian are in there too. On top of that, after the Norman conquest, the offical language as used in the courts was in fact French, not a lot of people know that, but what that has to do with the way MY language is ruined by users of my tongue from the States is really something else!
Btw, are you a Kraut? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think accents are an issue, after all in our little part of the globe we have myriad regional ones as well.
What is more important in my view is that American is a different language and as such should be labelled accordingly instead of being called American English. It s no more English than Americans are.
Americans have a great many words which bear no relation to their British counterparts, as indeed they have sayings that would be incomprehensible to anyone who has never watched an American film. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What is more important in my view is that American is a different language and as such should be labelled accordingly instead of being called American English. It s no more English than Americans are. |
Would you like to divide the EFL world into those students who want to learn 'merican as versus those who want to learn Brit-speak? I reckon the Yanks will take most of the pie by far. Including the European one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the same token then, should Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the Bahamas rename their languages? Moreover, it's also an "official language" in 58 other sovereign states and in 21 "non-sovereign entities." And it's the "de facto" language in 6. Of course, one of those is Great Britain, but then the point is raised: should Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland be required to rename their languages?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_where_English_is_an_official_language
Regards,
John
Last edited by johnslat on Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Capt Lugwash
Joined: 14 Aug 2014 Posts: 346
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spiral perhaps that just might be a good idea - the Americans take the biggest "slice of pie" out of everything in the world anyway.
John I think you will find I was talking about language and not accents. Certainly Oz and Kiwi teach English (at least the former did when I went to school there when I was a child).
A Chinese student learning American will get on famously in Canada, the USA and probably outlying islands but would encounter serious language barriers in Europe where they teach English as opposed to a bastardisation of it.
None of you can deny that you have alien words and expressions, surely??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|