|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JRJohn
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 8:54 am Post subject: Is The Foreigner Physical Still Official Policy For U.K. ? |
|
|
I have been offered a teaching job in a high school in Beijing. This is a government high school, and NOT an international high school, as I am not licenced to teach in high schools in the U.K. The salary is 13,000 yuan per month, which is not bad.
The first time I went to China, the Chinese Embassy in London had a form called "Physical Check For Foreigner". I looked at the website recently, and could no longer see that form. I checked all over the website, and could not see any trace of that form. Is it still official government policy for U.K. applicants to undergo the medical tests? I ask, because the NHS refused to do them in 2010.
Instead I had to go to MASTA travel clinic where it cost 400 pounds. (The price will have gone up). On top of that, I will have to pay for my flight TO China, another 500 pounds. Then there is rent and housing deposits, which could be another 500 pounds at least. So I would have hell to pay in the first month.
If the health check is no longer strictly necessary I should have to pay 500 pounds less.
Since this is a government position, would it be worthwhile for me to ask to get an F Visa in the U.K. and change to a Z vissa in Hong Kong or something like that? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
3701 W.119th
Joined: 26 Feb 2014 Posts: 386 Location: Central China
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi there. I got my Z visa stamped by the embassy in London last week, and I wasn't required to provide any medical checks. The body of the visa application form itself has the following 4 'Yes/No' questions:
Quote: |
Are you experiencing any of the following conditions?
严重精神障碍Serious mental disorder
传染性肺结核病Infectious pulmonary tuberculosis
可能危害公共卫生的其他传染病Other infectious disease of public health hazards
□是Yes □否No
近30日内是否前往过流行性疾病传染的国家或地区?Did you visit countries or territories affected by infectious diseases in the last 30 days?
Yes □否No |
That's as far as it goes with health considerations at the moment, with the Chinese embassy London. I'd imagine the consulates in Manchester and Edinburgh follow suit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wangdaning
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 3154
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:09 am Post subject: Re: Is The Foreigner Physical Still Official Policy For U.K. |
|
|
JRJohn wrote: |
I have been offered a teaching job in a high school in Beijing. This is a government high school, and NOT an international high school, as I am not licenced to teach in high schools in the U.K. The salary is 13,000 yuan per month, which is not bad.
Then there is rent and housing deposits, which could be another 500 pounds at least. So I would have hell to pay in the first month. |
No clue about the medical, but want to point out 13,000 in Beijing is no good if you are also paying for housing.
Housing prices in Beijing are really high, will be more than 500 pounds to get set up. I would say at least 1,000 pounds just for that. Took me about 1,000 in Chengdu, which is cheaper. Granted, I did pay 6 months rent, but my rent is only 1,500 yuan, Beijing will be between double at triple that at least.
Just a warning, hopefully the high school is going to offer you housing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimpellow
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Posts: 913
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have to agree with the above poster that I think the salary offered is terrible without housing for Beijing. I think it is so bad in fact, that I think you are walking into a trap. Just my opinion but sounds like your salary is being skimmed by the recruiter and/or the headmaster.
The medical depends on the locality as to where you will be teaching, not your nationality. Beijing is generally considered along with Tianjin and Qingdao to now have the toughest visa requirements, although Beijing made the criminal background check less strenuous a few months back. I would definitely say you will be needing a pre medical before arriving unless Beijing did a very odd about face.
Love this site so I will paste it again:
www.lawandborder.com
With tougher enforcement of improper visas, and some F to Z applicants being turned down in Hong Kong, I would strongly suggest coming on the proper visa or not coming at all.
Best of luck! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Piper2
Joined: 13 Jun 2014 Posts: 146
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
jimpellow wrote: |
The medical depends on the locality as to where you will be teaching, not your nationality. Beijing is generally considered along with Tianjin and Qingdao to now have the toughest visa requirements, although Beijing made the criminal background check less strenuous a few months back. I would definitely say you will be needing a pre medical before arriving unless Beijing did a very odd about face. |
Jim, the OP is asking about a pre-z visa medical that is sometimes required in order to apply for a z-visa (in a foreign country, not China). The information I have clearly points to Chinese Embassies/Consulates in each country having their own regulations on the matter. I have never heard that these Embassy regulations were influenced by visa(?) requirements in different regions in China. (I am not saying it is not so, just that I have never heard of it.)
Are you perhaps referring to RP requirements? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimpellow
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Posts: 913
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Jim, the OP is asking about a pre-z visa medical that is sometimes required in order to apply for a z-visa (in a foreign country, not China). The information I have clearly points to Chinese Embassies/Consulates in each country having their own regulations on the matter. I have never heard that these Embassy regulations were influenced by visa(?) requirements in different regions in China. (I am not saying it is not so, just that I have never heard of it.) Are you perhaps referring to RP requirements?"
Hmm...interesting point. Perhaps I am wrong, wouldn't be the first time.
Personally, I know when I accepted and never took a position in Tianjin last year they stated that I could apply for the z-visa in any country (incorrectly), but needed a pre medical for Tianjin. Six months later I accepted but never took a position in Guanxi and they said no pre-med was necessary wherever I got it. Problem was living in Southeast Asia I still couldn't find a place last fall that would issue the z-visa without traveling back to the US.
As of May 15th this is what Gary says. Who I think is the leading expert. Though he is always stating that localities have the ability to strengthen and reinterpret the State regulations, the regulations are very vague, and some of the laws are not disclosed to the public. What a mess.
"Under prior rules, foreigners coming to China for residence one year or longer should, when applying for visas at the Chinese embassy or other visa issuing agency abroad, get a medical exam. (2010 Implementing Rules, art. 6). Under the new regulations, this is no longer a requirement. Now, a visa-issuing agency will require a medical exam only if the officer has particular concerns about the applicant’s health condition."
It seems that the pre-med requirement had been originating from the State, doesn't it? What is interesting though is he does seem to be saying that under the latest revisions a pre-med is no longer required unless there is a concern. Maybe that is what the OP is experiencing. Wonder how many foreigners coming to China will still have to go through this hassle and expense as the FAO or other involved parties don't know this latest twist? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Piper2
Joined: 13 Jun 2014 Posts: 146
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
jimpellow wrote: |
"Jim, the OP is asking about a pre-z visa medical that is sometimes required in order to apply for a z-visa (in a foreign country, not China). The information I have clearly points to Chinese Embassies/Consulates in each country having their own regulations on the matter. I have never heard that these Embassy regulations were influenced by visa(?) requirements in different regions in China. (I am not saying it is not so, just that I have never heard of it.) Are you perhaps referring to RP requirements?"
Hmm...interesting point. Perhaps I am wrong, wouldn't be the first time.
Personally, I know when I accepted and never took a position in Tianjin last year they stated that I could apply for the z-visa in any country (incorrectly), but needed a pre medical for Tianjin. Six months later I accepted but never took a position in Guanxi and they said no pre-med was necessary wherever I got it. Problem was living in Southeast Asia I still couldn't find a place last fall that would issue the z-visa without traveling back to the US.
As of May 15th this is what Gary says. Who I think is the leading expert. Though he is always stating that localities have the ability to strengthen and reinterpret the State regulations, the regulations are very vague, and some of the laws are not disclosed to the public. What a mess.
"Under prior rules, foreigners coming to China for residence one year or longer should, when applying for visas at the Chinese embassy or other visa issuing agency abroad, get a medical exam. (2010 Implementing Rules, art. 6). Under the new regulations, this is no longer a requirement. Now, a visa-issuing agency will require a medical exam only if the officer has particular concerns about the applicant’s health condition."
It seems that the pre-med requirement had been originating from the State, doesn't it? What is interesting though is he does seem to be saying that under the latest revisions a pre-med is no longer required unless there is a concern. Maybe that is what the OP is experiencing. Wonder how many foreigners coming to China will still have to go through this hassle and expense as the FAO or other involved parties don't know this latest twist? |
Jim, the point I was making was that, it seemed to me, the (Chinese Government) requirement for a medical pre-z visa has in the last few years been enforced at some Chinese Embassies/Consulates/Visa Centres (henceforth Embassies) and not enforced at others. Additionally, the list of z-visa requirements issued by the Embassies merely stated this requirement, or did not mention a pre-z visa medical at all. There was no indication that the need for a medical pre-z visa was dependant on regulations of the Chinese province one would be working in.
That said, I have not found any reason to distrust the parts of Gary Chodorow's lawandborder blog that I have read -I have found his replies to comments particularly useful. The quote you included would explain why some Embassies no longer require the medical. I do not think that the quote contradicts what I wrote here or above, however.
You express concern, and rightly so, that FAOs may give incorrect z-visa information. A simple way to avoid incorrect z-visa information is to use primary sources and good secondary sources. E.g. I recommend accessing the recently updated website of the Embassy you will be using and then confirming by email or phone. Other posters (e.g. Bud Powell) recommend getting information from a reliable visa agent.
I agree that it now seems that only AFTER contacting an Embassy MIGHT we be required to do a medical pre-z visa. Apparently it would all depend on how Embassy staff with no medical training choose to interpret our comments, coughs, sneezes, demeanour, appearance in our emails, on the phone or in person. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimpellow
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Posts: 913
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am not in disagreement, in fact I have changed my opinion here to see it more from your view as being at the embassy level rather than the provincial. I do think though that some people had been getting seemingly bad information from the FAO, as seems to have happened in my case. If their information had been provided by the provincial authorities, and if this was also erroneous, or somehow having been required at that level as an augmentation of the State law I cannot tell.
It seems in the past that some of the confusion may have stemmed from vagueness of the word "should".
I think it is rather exciting news that they have lightened up on the pre-med requirement, as it should save a lot of foreigners from this rather needless and potentially expensive hurdle. I think it is another indication that they are scaling back on what has been becoming a very difficult and expensive process to work here.
No disagreement on getting as much advice as you can, and not just relying on the FAO. I learned the hard way like some others of the pitfalls in believing the FAO knows all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shroob
Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm in the middle of getting a Z visa, submitted the documents and waiting to collect. At no stage did the consulate (I didn't go to the embassy in my country) request a health check. Just scans of the invitation letter and work permit (I had the originals but they handed them back to me). The job I'm going to though did request a health check, but they accepted the one I did back in 2011.
In 2011 when I first applied for a visa I took the health check with me, but I was told at the consulate they didn't need it then. They said it was the employer that needed it. So I'm guessing either it's part of the application to get the work permit/invitation letter or it's not actually required just recommended. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Listerine

Joined: 15 Jun 2014 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
There was a thread about this a few months ago and the general consensus was that the London embassy does not require the medical check. Having been said some FAOs in China can be wary about the time and expense involved at their end getting your invitation letter without seeing first that you will pass the medical check. The embassy may not require it in advance, but the individual school might. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Piper2
Joined: 13 Jun 2014 Posts: 146
|
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Listerine wrote: |
some FAOs in China can be wary about the time and expense involved at their end getting your invitation letter without seeing first that you will pass the medical check. The embassy may not require it in advance, but the individual school might. |
I can understand why some schools might require it (add to the above the hassle of finding a replacement at short notice). Though realistically the fact that a teacher sends the school a scan or even the original is of little value; how would a Chinese school know if the medical check was real? Logic aside, as long as the form stated everything was fine, was stamped and looked half genuine, who at the school would (want to) question it? Given this state of affairs why would a teacher pay a fortune for a real check up?
Of course I am not suggesting any healthy teacher fake a medical for an overly cautious school when yet another medical will be required once the teacher is in China, that would be unethical. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimpellow
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Posts: 913
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am not being argumentative, but for the sake of discussion find the belief that a school itself would ask for the pre-med as implausible.
For one, that would be saying that it is Chinese nature to think of possibilities far out. It is rarely their nature to do so.
In addition, they are in competition for half sane teachers. Asking for a pre-med would put them at a competitive disadvantage with other schools.
When I came to China I was not required to have one for my first job in Jiangsu. I liked the FAO as he had integrity and cared about the welfare of the teachers. We remained friends after I left and would visit him whenever I visited my first city, which was very close to the second one. I distinctly remember him bemoaning how he was losing teaching candidates due to the new pre-med requirement. I never asked for details, but certainly felt and still do that it was outside his realm of control.
I am leaning that the requirement for the pre-med had more to do with how an issuing visa entity and/or provincial authorities interpreted a vaguely worded State requirement, or had the motivation and ability to require one for their own reasons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Piper2
Joined: 13 Jun 2014 Posts: 146
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jimpellow wrote: |
I am not being argumentative, but for the sake of discussion find the belief that a school itself would ask for the pre-med as implausible.
For one, that would be saying that it is Chinese nature to think of possibilities far out. It is rarely their nature to do so.
In addition, they are in competition for half sane teachers. Asking for a pre-med would put them at a competitive disadvantage with other schools. |
Before Listerine's post I had never heard of a school asking for a pre-z medical, though if schools/FAOs were unlucky enough have a couple of teachers fail the medical in China then they would have reason to ask future teachers for one. The FAO might have had his/her wrists slapped and decided to avoid any such problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|