|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bonesleet
Joined: 21 Jun 2014 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:26 am Post subject: Severance pay at a private university |
|
|
I was offered a contract with a private university. Everything looks good except that they said that the severance pay for the first five years would be 1/4 a month's salary and 1/2 a month's salary for five years and after. I found this Web site, which says otherwise. http://help.sap.com/saphelp_lochrsae605/helpdata/en/9e/4a2452c3309b60e10000000a44176d/content.htm "The severance award is equal to the wages for half of one month at the end of employment for each of the first five years of service, and one whole month for each subsequent year, prorated according to the time the employee worked." Unless you quit, in which case it's different: for less than 2 years, no award; for 2 to 5 successive years, 1/3 of the award; for more than 5 successive years but less than 10 years, 2/3 of the award; and for 10 successive years or more, full award. Is this Web site accurate? Am I being offered a smaller percentage because a "private" versus a "public" university doesn't have to follow these regulations? Or is there simply something wrong/Are they trying to stiff me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yup. Yer bein' stiffed. The law sez 1/2 month per year for the first five...
Strange tho, Saudis aren't known for being miserly or going back on their word on contracts.
You see, it's unislamic and goes against their basic precept of treating people decently... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bonesleet
Joined: 21 Jun 2014 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you worked at a private university in Saudi? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
bonesleet wrote: |
Have you worked at a private university in Saudi? |
No, but employment law is employment law...besides...
...I was being facetious about Saudi altruism...that takes a couple more centuries to evolve... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bonesleet:
You could certainly bring this contract "discrepancy" to the attention of the employer in hopes the "error" will be corrected. However, if that doesn't get you satisfactory results, you have a couple of options:
1) sign the contract anyway 'as is' (i.e., live with it); or
2) decline the job offer and look elsewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
End of service gratuity (what you call "severance pay") is specified in the Labour Code. Half a month's salary for five years then a month's salary for each year of serviuce. So five years service will get you 2.5 months but 6 years will get you 6 months.
This applies to all employers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coder
Joined: 12 Jun 2014 Posts: 94 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:30 pm Post subject: Re: Severance pay at a private university |
|
|
bonesleet wrote: |
...Am I being offered a smaller percentage because a "private" versus a "public" university doesn't have to follow these regulations? Or is there simply something wrong/Are they trying to stiff me? |
It’s highly unlikely that you are being “stiffed”.
New employees to the Kingdom of Humanity quickly learn that what is written down on paper as “rules and regulations” (whether stated or implied) are almost always “subject to the discretion and interpretation of the employer” especially as regards non-Saudi employees.
The most obvious example of this practice are government “regulations” having to do with retention of an employee after reaching a certain age. As we all know, many employers in the Kingdom, especially at the uni level, retain teachers way past their prime, and certainly way past the “official” regulation that states “60 and out” although I suspect this has little to do with the vaunted and somewhat kinky veneration of the elderly.
Another example of this has to do with the “end of service” gratuity. Almost every institution I know of interprets and applies these regulations differently. In some places, you get a “full bonus” for every year you stay beyond 5 years. In other places, you bonus STOPS when it reaches a certain level, say, SR100,000, no matter how long you actually work in the Kingdom. And so on.
Another example of this has to do with exit visas. According to some regulations, the employer is supposed to pay for these (I’ve actually seen the regulation on paper), but no employer I’ve run across does this. All visas (except the final exit visa) are paid by the employee.
In your case, you would be getting stiffed if the rules as you stated them only applied to you. But almost certainly the rules as you stated them applies to all foreign employees in your category in your company. One way to verify this sort of thing is to actually speak with a current employee in-Kingdom of your nationality, which I know is not always possible.
It's vital to realize that as with so much in KSA, the "Labor Code" really functions as an "ideal", a "guide", a "model"......something one aspires to reach. It doesn't mean that any employer actually applies (or is expected to apply) it at his workplace, certainly not down to the level of "every last detail."
(Note that this approach and attitude prevails throughout much of the Middle East in nearly all spheres of endeavor and is the greatest source of frustration for westerners working in this part of the world - simply because they don't know how things work here). (Of course, "knowing" about it and "accepting" it are 2 different things. Can you "accept" it? Probably not.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:01 pm Post subject: Re: Severance pay at a private university |
|
|
coder wrote: |
bonesleet wrote: |
...Am I being offered a smaller percentage because a "private" versus a "public" university doesn't have to follow these regulations? Or is there simply something wrong/Are they trying to stiff me? |
It’s highly unlikely that you are being “stiffed”.
New employees to the Kingdom of Humanity quickly learn that what is written down on paper as “rules and regulations” (whether stated or implied) are almost always “subject to the discretion and interpretation of the employer” especially as regards non-Saudi employees.
The most obvious example of this practice are government “regulations” having to do with retention of an employee after reaching a certain age. As we all know, many employers in the Kingdom, especially at the uni level, retain teachers way past their prime, and certainly way past the “official” regulation that states “60 and out” although I suspect this has little to do with the vaunted and somewhat kinky veneration of the elderly.
Another example of this has to do with the “end of service” gratuity. Almost every institution I know of interprets and applies these regulations differently. In some places, you get a “full bonus” for every year you stay beyond 5 years. In other places, you bonus STOPS when it reaches a certain level, say, SR100,000, no matter how long you actually work in the Kingdom. And so on.
Another example of this has to do with exit visas. According to some regulations, the employer is supposed to pay for these (I’ve actually seen the regulation on paper), but no employer I’ve run across does this. All visas (except the final exit visa) are paid by the employee.
In your case, you would be getting stiffed if the rules as you stated them only applied to you. But almost certainly the rules as you stated them applies to all foreign employees in your category in your company. One way to verify this sort of thing is to actually speak with a current employee in-Kingdom of your nationality, which I know is not always possible.
It's vital to realize that as with so much in KSA, the "Labor Code" really functions as an "ideal", a "guide", a "model"......something one aspires to reach. It doesn't mean that any employer actually applies (or is expected to apply) it at his workplace, certainly not down to the level of "every last detail."
(Note that this approach and attitude prevails throughout much of the Middle East in nearly all spheres of endeavor and is the greatest source of frustration for westerners working in this part of the world - simply because they don't know how things work here). (Of course, "knowing" about it and "accepting" it are 2 different things. Can you "accept" it? Probably not.) |
Boy! I'll just bet that the WHO, WTO and other international bodies would've liked to have heard THAT when the Saudis were asking to sign on:
Saudi: "You do realize that keeping our end of the deal is the ideal only?"
Negotiator: "Yeah, we can accept that."
Sheesh!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is often a proviso that the ceiling is SR100,000 in a final payout. Good employers (like KFUPM) get round that to the employee's advantage, by paying a chunk of the End-of-Service Benefit during the contractual term, or compensating by increasing the monthly salary.
The employers who want to stiff you are the contractors who make their money by paying you as little as possible and by charging the service-user as much as they can.
Avoid them and go for direct hire with a government university. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bonesleet
Joined: 21 Jun 2014 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 5:09 pm Post subject: Well put |
|
|
nomadsoul, you sum it up quite well:
1) sign the contract anyway 'as is' (i.e., live with it); or
2) decline the job offer and look elsewhere.
And coder, you make a good point: "Probably not," which means I'll be choosing option 2 if they find my astuteness unappealing.
I completed a 2-year contract in Saudi before and was appropriately paid a full month's salary, so when I was being interviewed yesterday I knew the numbers were fishy. I think I'll take nomadsoul's advice and point the "mistake" out to them and hope they "correct" it. If they take offense to that, then they're probably not worth bothering with. Those little lies and slights we have to live with add up over time until they boil over. That's been my experience at least. I remember how frustrated I was the last time I left Saudi. I'm always reminded of that feeling when I read the posts in the Saudi forum. I'm pretty happy now and not looking to be jaded again. There's no point in jumping out of the frying pan back into the fire if I can smell the burnt fish below. Thanks to everyone for the advice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SheikMilkShake
Joined: 02 Jul 2014 Posts: 84
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Saudi labor laws say 1/2 month salary as ESB/ severance pay for each year of service.
It would be pointless to argue with them before you even stat working. what ever money/salary and bonus you will get, it will be worth it. If their contract is like that, you either have to take or leave it.
If your salary is 10,000 Riyals, ESB would be 5000 riyals for each year of service, once you complete one year or it would be pro rated. if they say 1/3 , that means you would get 3500 Riyals. Would you worry about the 1500 Riyals loss after 1 year service, or would you think about 10000 Riyals x 12 months = 12,0000 Riyals you would make in a year? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
SheikMilkShake wrote: |
It would be pointless to argue with them before you even stat working... |
No, that's more like a stupid tactic to use. Bringing an error to the employer's attention and giving them the opportunity to correct it (or not) in no way means arguing with them about it. A little diplomacy goes a long way. Besides, if the OP feels it's important to him/her, there's no harm in addressing it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coder
Joined: 12 Jun 2014 Posts: 94 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that there’s no harm in asking them (casually and diplomatically) about the severance award during the early phase of your contacts with them. You might say something like: “In my last KSA contract, I was offered……and I’m wondering why there’s such a discrepancy with what you’re offering. Perhaps an inadvertent error occurred….blah blah blah”
At the same time, it’s extremely unlikely that an “error” occurred. If they reply to you at all, it’ll be along the lines that the award offered is the same one that all their foreign contract workers get and such policy has been in place for years, something like that.
If you then bring up the Labor Code, that’s going to turn your enquiry into an accusation and you may as well kiss the job goodbye.
As I said above in my previous post on this thread, a written agreement or document or even Labor Code, is subject to the interpretation of the employer. This has been shown to be true in countless cases.
And finally, I don’t really understand why anyone would get upset about this way of doing things. Very similar approaches and attitudes exist just about everywhere on the planet, not just the ME. In some respects, Latin America, which I know very well, has an even worse reputation for its lackadaisical attitude towards adherence to the “rules and regulations”. (And if you think “wasta” rules the day in the Gulf, you ain’t ever been to Sao Paolo, La Paz, Quito or Lima.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Fifth Column

Joined: 11 Jun 2014 Posts: 331 Location: His habitude with lexical items protrudes not unlike a damaged pollex!!!
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Then please to explain this (to be found as a "stickie"):
"Part two: general directives:
The Labour Law in Saudi Arabia is a balanced law that regulates all aspects of labour relations between workers and employees and applicable to all Saudi and Non-Saudi workers without discrimination." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
2buckets
Joined: 14 Dec 2010 Posts: 515 Location: Middle East
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is this something recent. I did 3 contracts in SA and got a month for each year, (back in the 90s). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|