|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:49 pm Post subject: TEFL & the value of qualifications/degrees |
|
|
A poster in another thread asked, "Does anyone actually believe that a qualification decides who is a good and who is a bad teacher?" This question deserves its own discussion but should include any qualification, whether that be a degree, TEFL certificate, or teaching license.
I responded with the following:Of course not. A qualification (e.g., degree, certificate, or license) basically signifies the holder has satisfactorily demonstrated knowledge, skills, and/or abilities of a particular standardized activity, tasks, or course of study toward completion. What he/she subsequently does with those KSAs determines the quality of teaching (as well as the students' learning), taking into consideration any or all of the following tangible and intangible criteria:
-- student feedback (e.g., elicited in class, during office visits, or from anonymous surveys on the teacher and course)
-- student course grades and progress
-- students' TOEFL and IELTS results
-- students' level of motivation, cooperation, and engagement
-- students' use of self correction
-- reflective teaching
-- self observation and critique (via videotape)
-- informal peer and formal classroom observations with feedback
-- continuing professional development
...and so on
Teaching and learning are ongoing and fluid. That is, we're constantly practicing the art of teaching---adapting to our students' language needs, the physical learning environment, introduction of new technology, yada yada.
So, what say you? Do you believe a TEFL qualification, degree, or teaching license determines whether a teacher will be effective in the classroom? Why/why not? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lack
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, doesn't mean jack. Problem is, being an actual "good teacher" doesn't matter since it is the employer that decides what "good" is. In Asia, for example, your face is your skill. Just be attractive and don't be unattractive and you are quite a "good teacher" indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spicnspan
Joined: 27 Aug 2014 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 8:23 pm Post subject: Re: TEFL & the value of qualifications/degrees |
|
|
nomad soul wrote: |
A qualification (e.g., degree, certificate, or license) basically signifies the holder has satisfactorily demonstrated knowledge, skills, and/or abilities of a particular standardized activity, tasks, or course of study toward completion. What he/she subsequently does with those KSAs determines the quality of teaching (as well as the students' learning), taking into consideration any or all of the following tangible and intangible criteria:
-- student feedback (e.g., elicited in class, during office visits, or from anonymous surveys on the teacher and course)
-- student course grades and progress
-- students' TOEFL and IELTS results
-- students' level of motivation, cooperation, and engagement
-- students' use of self correction
-- reflective teaching
-- self observation and critique (via videotape)
-- informal peer and formal classroom observations with feedback
-- continuing professional development
...and so on
|
I wholeheartedly agree with your criteria listed (although I do have my qualms about "students' level of motivation, cooperation and engagement" being tangible and/or measurable in any way and I do have my issues with how we measure "effectiveness". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 8:28 pm Post subject: Re: TEFL & the value of qualifications/degrees |
|
|
spicnspan wrote: |
...although I do have my qualms about "students' level of motivation, cooperation and engagement" being tangible and/or measurable in any way and I do have my issues with how we measure "effectiveness". |
I did mention that some of the criteria is intangible. But please elaborate on the issues you have with how teacher effectiveness is measured. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
adaruby
Joined: 21 Apr 2014 Posts: 171 Location: has served on a hiring committee
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:31 am Post subject: Re: TEFL & the value of qualifications/degrees |
|
|
nomad soul wrote: |
A poster in another thread asked, "Does anyone actually believe that a qualification decides who is a good and who is a bad teacher?" This question deserves its own discussion but should include any qualification, whether that be a degree, TEFL certificate, or teaching license.
I responded with the following:Of course not. A qualification (e.g., degree, certificate, or license) basically signifies the holder has satisfactorily demonstrated knowledge, skills, and/or abilities of a particular standardized activity, tasks, or course of study toward completion. What he/she subsequently does with those KSAs determines the quality of teaching (as well as the students' learning), taking into consideration any or all of the following tangible and intangible criteria:
-- student feedback (e.g., elicited in class, during office visits, or from anonymous surveys on the teacher and course)
-- student course grades and progress
-- students' TOEFL and IELTS results
-- students' level of motivation, cooperation, and engagement
-- students' use of self correction
-- reflective teaching
-- self observation and critique (via videotape)
-- informal peer and formal classroom observations with feedback
-- continuing professional development
...and so on
Teaching and learning are ongoing and fluid. That is, we're constantly practicing the art of teaching---adapting to our students' language needs, the physical learning environment, introduction of new technology, yada yada.
So, what say you? Do you believe a TEFL qualification, degree, or teaching license determines whether a teacher will be effective in the classroom? Why/why not? |
A semi-respected teaching qualification demonstrates that this person has the tools in the locker to enable them to become a good teacher. A reasonably challenging first certificate such as a CELTA, for example, sorts the wheat from the chaff, but it doesn't mean they're gonna be great in the classroom.
What matters most is building on a solid foundation, which a good qualification provides, with continuous professional development in a supportive environment where teachers are respected and the be all and end all of the employer is not bums on seats and a bulging bank balance.
Unfortunately, this isn't always the case in many language factories. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|