View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
revilo
Joined: 05 Oct 2013 Posts: 181 Location: Mos Eisley
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:39 am Post subject: Contract states "do not work for other companies. Perio |
|
|
so this company wants me to teach exclusively for them. It stipulates that I shall not teach, even on summer vacations, nor will I belong to an organization without their prior consent. There goes the Skype income for several potential teachers. This brings up the question of "will they prohibit membership in certain organizations?" Maybe TESOL.org is too militant for them? and how will they possibly know if I teach in, say, Moscow? If I teach 30 or 45 days, I can just say, "It was an extended vacation, look, there's no work visa stamp."
Isn't it a violation of my rights as to what I choose to do when I'm not teaching  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
The prohibition on secondary employment ("moonlighting") is common. I have never heard of employers telling you not to join the Rotary, Boy Scouts or other subversive organisations. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And how would they know if anyone was teaching on Skype or in some other country during summer leave? This is a common rule and really only enforceable if you moonlight in KSA... and then all they can do is fire and deport you.
BTW... basically once you enter Saudi, you have no rights. You are merely a better paid level of slave.
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
plumpy nut
Joined: 12 Mar 2011 Posts: 1652
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a fairly reasonable chance that it is enforceable with the Labor dept. Fines for erring teachers brought to Labor Court by a company can be severe. There really are no laws providing reasonable rights for teachers. Labor generally is concerned that the teacher is paid what the contract stipulates and that is about it, and vice-versa that the teacher obeys the contract. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
plumpy nut wrote: |
There really are no laws providing reasonable rights for teachers. Labor generally is concerned that the teacher is paid what the contract stipulates and that is about it, and vice-versa that the teacher obeys the contract. |
Exactly what are you considering to be "reasonable rights for teachers" beyond the provisions per the employment agreement? In fact, the term reasonable is ambiguous. Given this context, it varies based on each person's individual expectations and perceptions. In other words, "reasonable rights" is a gray area for the courts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|