|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:03 pm Post subject: "six more weeks of winter" vs. "six weeks mor |
|
|
Two days ago in my comp class, a student asked me why we say "six more weeks of winter" instead of "six weeks more of winter." My short answer (we were on a tangent as it was anyway) was: It has to do with the rules pertaining to order of adjectives. Numbers always come first.
After pondering the question a bit more after class, I've looked this up in a few different books and, while it's clear that I'm right about numbers coming first, I'm stumped when it comes to how we categorize the adjective "more." Does it fall into the category of size like thin, fat, big, or small? Or am I missing something here?
For those who haven't taught this in awhile and don't keep your grammar books next to the computer , here's a list of common categories used when ordering adjectives.
http://www.esolcourses.com/content/exercises/grammar/adjectives/adjectiveorder/adjectiveorder.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is more an adjective? Not a quantifier?... Drat! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/more?s=t
More can actually be lots of things, depending on context. If it can be used as a quantifier, somebody should tip off the folks at dictionary.com (and maybe Wikipedia too.)
Though, it appears that some folks in the ESL profession would concur with you that more is, in fact, a quantifier, Comrade.
https://www.tesol-direct.com/guide-to-english-grammar/quantifiers
So assuming it is, what rule dictates that we say "six more weeks of winter" instead of "six weeks more of winter?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2015 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think this is clearly a question for a furry rodent to gnaw his way through : )
As soon as he posts his thesis, I'll do my best to provide an antithesis. Then you can form a synthesis. Who could ask for anything...more? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of course, a little bit of Hegelian method. That should help me find a solution.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Socratic questions are nudging us along nicely, though. Don't you think? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'll hear no complaints about Socrates from me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roadwalker

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 1750 Location: Ch
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't hear 'six weeks more of winter' as necessarily wrong but I think that changes more to a noun. I usually would say 'six more weeks of winter,' and I agree that it's an adjective as opposed to a quantifier. We could have an idea in mind about the quantity of 'some' or 'many' standing alone (and depending on the context), but not for 'more'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
artemisia

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 875 Location: the world
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
artemisia wrote: |
I think the use of ‘more’ is a quantifying (post)determiner in the sentence: There are six more weeks of winter. Determiners go before the noun in pre, central or post order. Whether or not ‘more’ can also be classed as an adjective, I think it’s the rule governing determiners that applies here. |
Thanks for sharing! These links are interesting. One problem, though. You suggest that more is a post-determiner, which seems plausible. But according to the .uk link, cardinal numbers (e.g., six) are also post-determiners. Can you have two separate words in the post-determiner slot? My understanding is that's not allowable. So either I'm wrong about that or, perhaps, another rule comes into play here. Any thoughts? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
roadwalker wrote: |
I don't hear 'six weeks more of winter' as necessarily wrong but I think that changes more to a noun. I usually would say 'six more weeks of winter,' and I agree that it's an adjective as opposed to a quantifier. We could have an idea in mind about the quantity of 'some' or 'many' standing alone (and depending on the context), but not for 'more'. |
Classifying more as an adjective would certainly simplify things, roadwalker, but for purposes of following the order of adjectives rule, how do we categorize more? Based on the fairly standard textbook categories I linked to above, the category of size/appearance/length seems closest, but that's still a bit of a stretch.
While there seems to be disagreement as to whether or not more is an adjective, quantifier, determiner or, perhaps, a combination thereof, depending on context, those who classify it as an adjective (or would like to) should be able to offer an explanation as to where it fits in the order of adjectives sequence. Hence, my initial question posted above: I'm stumped when it comes to how we categorize the adjective "more." Does it fall into the category of size like thin, fat, big, or small? Or am I missing something here? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
artemisia

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 875 Location: the world
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Under the UCL link (p. 3), it states that two postdeterminers can be placed together, so ‘six’ and ‘more’ could be classed as postdeterminers: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/internet-grammar/determin/ex3.htm
I've also seen other references to two postdeterminers occurring together. However, it’s a bit odd to talk about two postdeterminers in one sentence when there’s no central one. Determiners can change categories, but I've checked a few different references and am not 100% sure if cardinal numbers can also function as central determiners.
Back to order of adjectives: perhaps if 'more' is a quantifier of the number, then it must be placed directly after it. In no.2 below, it’s not possible to put ‘more’ anywhere other than directly after the number and before the noun:
1. I’d like five (green) apples.
2. I’d like five more (green) apples.
It’s difficult with words that potentially come under several word classes, but probably the above is the easiest explanation for students. Adding adjectives makes this clearer.
["There are six more icy-cold weeks of winter" vs "There are six icy-cold weeks more of winter"].
http://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/en/english-grammar/determiners-and-quantifiers/quantifiers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
How is 'more' functioning is the example sentence? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sashadroogie wrote: |
How is 'more' functioning is the example sentence? |
Given the overlapping definitions of the terms quantifier, adjective, and determiner, pretty much however you want it to. Hence, the maxim "Wherever two or three English teachers are gathered, there shall be four or five opinions."
Right now, I'm leaning towards a quantifier (which, I believe some would argue, is simply a subset of adjectives) as it clearly "indicates the number or amount weeks being referred to."
Based on examples in the student copy of my Basic Grammar textbook, the rule, which is not explicitly stated, seems to be that quantifiers precede adjectives in a noun phrase. Thus, one could say:
six more weeks of winter
OR
six more beautiful long cold weeks of winter
The quantifier more appears to be unique amongst quantifiers in that it can be preceded (but not followed) by a cardinal number. Thus, we can say six more but not six many, six several, or six some.
In any case, the simple answer to my student's question as to why not "six weeks more of winter" rather than "six more weeks of winter" should have been that the quantifier more (or any quantifier for that matter) should precede but not follow the noun.
Alternatively, if one were to advocate that this is simply a question of order of adjectives, then quantifiers should be lumped into the same category as numbers (with the caveat that more can be preceded by a cardinal number), so the order would be:
Numbers/Quantifiers
Opinion/Judgement
Size/Appearance/Length
Etc.
However, given that there are a number of special rules that apply to quantifiers that don't apply to other adjectives (e.g., any is used in negative statements but some in affirmative statements), it may be best to simply treat quantifiers as a separate category. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
esl_prof

Joined: 30 Nov 2013 Posts: 2006 Location: peyi kote solèy frèt
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
artemisia wrote: |
Under the UCL link (p. 3), it states that two postdeterminers can be placed together, so ‘six’ and ‘more’ could be classed as postdeterminers: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/internet-grammar/determin/ex3.htm
I've also seen other references to two postdeterminers occurring together. However, it’s a bit odd to talk about two postdeterminers in one sentence when there’s no central one. Determiners can change categories, but I've checked a few different references and am not 100% sure if cardinal numbers can also function as central determiners.
Back to order of adjectives: perhaps if 'more' is a quantifier of the number, then it must be placed directly after it. In no.2 below, it’s not possible to put ‘more’ anywhere other than directly after the number and before the noun:
1. I’d like five (green) apples.
2. I’d like five more (green) apples.
It’s difficult with words that potentially come under several word classes, but probably the above is the easiest explanation for students. Adding adjectives makes this clearer.
["There are six more icy-cold weeks of winter" vs "There are six icy-cold weeks more of winter"].
http://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/en/english-grammar/determiners-and-quantifiers/quantifiers |
Again, interesting thoughts, Artemisia! Perhaps Graeme Kennedy said it best in your previous link:
However, the relationships between determiners are complicated and the rules underlying their use are not always well understood by linguists. The categories of determiners overlap and some determiners can be classified in more than one position.
Certainly, this suggests that you may well be right about cardinal numbers being able to occupy both the central and post-determiner slots. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|