Job Discussion Forums

[scot47]

http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/cruz-adviser-points-finger-at-saudis-for-911/

[johnslat]

Dear scot47,

Considering the source, I'll go with Loony Tunes,

"WND (formerly WorldNetDaily or, as it was affectionately known to its fans, WingNutDaily or WhirledNutDaily) is a far-right website and publisher founded by the ridiculously impressively mustachioed Joseph Farah in 1997, as a project of his Western Center for Journalism. WND espouses a fundamentalist Christian, creationist world view, with a healthy dose of jingoism. WND's coverage provides multiple sides of the issues: the very conservative viewpoint and the ultra-conservative viewpoint. WND makes Fox News look positively moonbatty in comparison. Managing Editor David Kupelian claims that WND "serves as your watchdog on government 365 days a year. We guard your priceless freedoms by aggressively exposing corruption and evil everywhere, and by championing good."

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/WND

Regards,
John

[scot47]

Those of us in the know are fully aware that the conspiracy was brought about by the Kiwanis and the Boy Scouts.

[johnslat]

Dear scot47,

Nonsense - here's the REAL story: "Dr Wood's observation of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001 led her to the conviction that the towers did not collapse but were "dustified" by a directed energy weapon. According to her, dustification involves molecular dissociation and transmutation.

In a whole series of lectures and media appearances, Wood has maintained that the debris pile was nowhere near tall enough to account for the aggregate mass of the towers and their contents. Rather, she states, the towers were pulverized in mid-air and simply blew away on the breeze.

On her web site, Wood presents a 41-point list of "The principal evidence that must be explained." It includes (point 9) "The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth", and (point 6) "The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition."[3]

She consistently declines to speculate about the exact nature of the weapon involved, where it was situated or who operated it. Her position is that, as a scientist, her role is to determine what happened that day. Others might or might not address those more political questions.

In 2010 her 544-page book Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 was published by "The New Investigation."

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE

Regards,
John

[scot47]

Only 544 pages ? Do you suppose anyone has read it ?