| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MI6agent
Joined: 16 Apr 2016 Posts: 87 Location: Dark Web
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 7:19 pm Post subject: You can’t always get what you want |
|
|
The Donald won’t be getting any satisfaction from the Rolling Stones’ recent comments.
The British rockers have told the Republican’s presumptive presidential nominee to stop using their music at his campaign rallies across the U.S.
“The Rolling Stones have never given permission to the Trump campaign to use their songs and have requested that they cease all use immediately,” a spokesperson for the Stones told the BBC this week.
Over the last year Trump and his team have been making heavy use of the Stones’ 1981 hit Start Me Up at campaign stops during his efforts to secure the GOP nomination, now all but in the bag. The rather aptly titled You Can’t Always Get What You Want has been another oft-used track.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/t-always-want-rolling-stones-014418790.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_K
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 2041 Location: A World of my Own
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| And? So this is another 'let's bash Trump with anything we can' post? It's all pretty pathetic - but predictable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All depends on one's POV, doesn't it?
What you see as "pathetic and pointless" may seem to others quite different.
I see thie following numbers as pathetic and pointless, at least from Trump's POV. The most recent poll, May 4th: "At the starting gate: Clinton leads Trump by double-digits, 54% to 41%.
Quite a bashing.
Sanders does even better.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RedLightning
Joined: 08 Aug 2015 Posts: 137 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
All depends on one's POV, doesn't it?
What you see as "pathetic and pointless" may seem to others quite different.
I see thie following numbers as pathetic and pointless, at least from Trump's POV. The most recent poll, May 4th: "At the starting gate: Clinton leads Trump by double-digits, 54% to 41%.
Quite a bashing.
Sanders does even better.
Regards,
John |
Ah, so Trump's political aspirations are pathetic and pointless as a select group of 1001 individuals (890 of whom registered voters) favored Hillary 54% to 41%?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/04/politics/poll-results-general-election-matchup/index.html
Granted, this is the nature of polling, but let's not pretend the 'Trump has no chance' mantra (polls,articles,etc) is anything other than an attempt to sway the subconscious of the general |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
steki47
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 1029 Location: BFE Inaka
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RedLightning wrote: |
| Granted, this is the nature of polling, but let's not pretend the 'Trump has no chance' mantra (polls,articles,etc) is anything other than an attempt to sway the subconscious of the general |
Bound to happen at this point. Hopeful speculation all around.
Ok, ready to place your bets? Cat Lady Supreme or Trumpen Jugend? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wangdaning
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 3154
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I doubt the Rolling Stones are in a position to demand anything as they probably do not own the rights to the song. They most likely sold that away long ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GF
Joined: 08 Jun 2003 Posts: 238 Location: Tallinn
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
All depends on one's POV, doesn't it?
What you see as "pathetic and pointless" may seem to others quite different.
I see thie following numbers as pathetic and pointless, at least from Trump's POV. The most recent poll, May 4th: "At the starting gate: Clinton leads Trump by double-digits, 54% to 41%.
Quite a bashing.
Sanders does even better.
Regards,
John |
The problem with polls is that there is always another one.
Trump 41%, Clinton 39%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/trump_41_clinton_39 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rasmussan - What a joke.
"The 105 polls released in Senate and gubernatorial races by Rasmussen Reports and its subsidiary, Pulse Opinion Research, missed the final margin between the candidates by 5.8 points, a considerably higher figure than that achieved by most other pollsters. Some 13 of its polls missed by 10 or more points, including one in the Hawaii Senate race that missed the final margin between the candidates by 40 points, the largest error ever recorded in a general election in FiveThirtyEight’s database, which includes all polls conducted since 1998.
Moreover, Rasmussen’s polls were quite biased, overestimating the standing of the Republican candidate by almost 4 points on average. In just 12 cases, Rasmussen’s polls overestimated the margin for the Democrat by 3 or more points. But it did so for the Republican candidate in 55 cases — that is, in more than half of the polls that it issued.
If one focused solely on the final poll issued by Rasmussen Reports or Pulse Opinion Research in each state — rather than including all polls within the three-week interv | |