| Aristotle 
 
  
 Joined: 16 Jan 2003
 Posts: 1388
 Location: Taiwan
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:00 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
	  | Quote: |  
	  | Editorial: Exploiting Taiwan's underclass
 Taipei Times
 Monday, Aug 09, 2004
 The Council of Labor Affairs recently announced that it was scrapping a
 proposed "financial management system" under which foreign laborers
 would be compelled to open personal accounts at selected banks. That
 at least is the part of the plan that made the news -- there is more to it.
 
 Thank heaven for that; let us be frank: Taiwan's record in dealing with
 foreign laborers is so abysmal that whenever some new government
 ordinance concerning them is proposed, cynicism and the most rigorous
 questioning concerning the motives behind it are entirely justified.
 Foreign laborers are Taiwan's great underclass, outrageously treated
 and utterly defenseless. Being without votes, and therefore of no political
 value, nobody anywhere in the political spectrum gives a damn about
 them. If anything, politicians try to make these unfortunates' lives even
 worse by pandering to the interests of their employers -- those interests
 revolving around getting more work for less pay and fewer fringe benefits.
 
 In the latest case, suspicions were aroused by the different justifications
 given for the new plan. First we were told that it was intended to regulate
 outward financial flows. Then we were told that it was to discourage
 financial exploitation by employment agencies or employers. Well, which
 is it?
 
 Probably not the first, if only because the figure the CLA gave for these
 currency-threatening overseas remittances was NT$72 billion a year.
 That's right, US$2.1 billion, which represents less than a week's trading
 on the local forex market, or less than a tenth of the annual interest on
 Taiwan's foreign currency reserves.
 
 As to the second explanation, let us first note that no groups
 representing foreign workers asked for the council's proposed system.
 They have asked for a system which makes them less able to be
 pitilessly exploited by employers and brokers. But the CLA's proposals
 are not such a system. In fact -- this will hardly come as a surprise -- they
 would actually aid such exploitation, by allowing exorbitant brokers' fees
 to be classed as loans, repayments for which would be compulsorily
 deducted from workers' pay.
 
 On top of this, the new measure would have made a significant change
 in the fringe benefits that overseas contract workers enjoyed. Currently,
 medical, funeral and repatriation costs are the expense of employers.
 The new scheme would have made the workers themselves liable for a
 significant burden of this, to be taken out of a proposed NT$3,000 per
 worker per month compulsory savings.
 
 As usual, the labor council took the side of the employers in trying to get
 more for less. Basically the council's strategy is to bail out employers by
 making foreign laborers cheaper to hire. This is detrimental not only to
 the workers themselves, but also to local workers, by depressing salary
 levels, and the economy as a whole, by trying to support a low-cost
 manufacturing economic model that has been obsolete for a decade or
 more.
 
 That the CLA has now dropped this plan -- at least for the time being -- is
 the result of protests by local labor groups. We congratulate them on
 their success.
 
 The irony is that there are very simple measures the council might pass
 which would vastly improve the lot of foreign workers. For example, it
 would be simple enough to outlaw the notorious "second contracts"
 which many workers have to sign and which, they find when they arrive in
 Taiwan, have deprived them of most of their rights under Taiwan's labor
 protection laws. It would also improve the lot of foreign workers if CLA
 approval, following a hearing, were needed before repatriation could take
 place -- the possibility of being sent home on an employer's whim is a
 constant threat. The very fact that the CLA eschews such simple
 measures tells us where its real interests lie -- and those aren't with the
 workers.
 This story has been viewed 621 times.
 
 
 |  |  |