View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mozsmith
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 2:30 am Post subject: Trinity vs Canterbury? |
|
|
Just wondering if anyone had completed a Trinity TESOL course or a Canterbury TEFL course in Spain. I am not sure which to consider. I would appreciate any feedback. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Spainish
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 61 Location: Madrid, Spain
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 5:02 pm Post subject: Canterbury Grad |
|
|
Hey Mozsmith,
Though I can't say I'm familiar with Trinity, I did the Canterbury TEFL course back in 2002. I enjoined it quite a bit as I did feel they prepared you well for that inevitable day that you must stand in front of *enter worst nightmare here* (A group of 7 kids can be just as daunting as 7 lawyers). The 30 or so hours of actual in class training helped a lot as well.
Their "social club" (The Canterbury Club) was an added bonus as you get to meet many of the other teachers and students to make friends, ask for advice, practice spanish or just have a good time at one of their monthly Pub Nights or excursions.
Furthermore they do a pretty good job of hiring all their graduates (if they desire to stay in Madrid and work for them, though it's not obligatory). But be warned that you will be traveling around the city a bit as you teach the classes at the business or home of the client, also the pay is average (some other academies pay more or you can always make more by finding your own clients).
All in all though, it's a good place to start!
Spainish |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SpanishFly
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:13 pm Post subject: Trinity more English , English & Canterbury more America |
|
|
As an English person can somebody tell me if taking the Trinity course will be more suited to my understanding of English than say the more American Canterbury course ? As I believe the learning content is different .
Are there any British people out there who have taken the Canterbury course ? How did you find it ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mouse
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 208
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i would go for trinity, personally, just because it's got wider international recognition. doesn�t mean the course�ll be any good, of course, but arguably one gets the certificate, but the real learning begins in the classroom. non-celta and non-trinity certificates do seem more common in spain than in some other countries i�ve seen, however. i wonder why. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cardinal Synn
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 586
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did the Trinity in Galicia in 2000. It is a good course if you do it at a decent school. And it is well recognized internationally.
I strongly recomend it.
CS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SpanishFly
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can't begin a stentence with " and " ,can you ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SpanishFly
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also ( not sure you can begin one with " also " either ) I wonder if the Canterbury course is easier to pass than the Trinity one. Wa ya say ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mouse
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 208
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
You can't begin a stentence with " and " ,can you ? |
You can't write sentence with an "st" either...
Actually although "classically" good English decrees (for no good reason that's apparent to me) that you can't begin a sentence with a conjunction, it seems to be more a stylistic issue than one of comprehensibility or good grammar. But who knows, right?
I doubt Canterbury is appreciably easier to pass than Trinity, but I have no first hand experience with either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cardinal Synn
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 586
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're right, sort of. You shouldn't start a sentence with "and" but it is often done. I did it in error however.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|