View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ouyang

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: on them internets
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:30 pm Post subject: Geography questions for non-americans |
|
|
I sometimes give a geographic place name lesson that I begin by asking the meaning of the olympic logo. The five rings stand for five continents. Americans recognize seven continents. The combination of north and south america as the americas is easy for me to explain, and the fact that antarctica is not habitable is the reason I tell my students that europeans don't consider it a continent. It's unlikely that there will ever be athletes representing antarctica.
But what do europeans consider antarctica to be, an island, a tectonic plate, are just a special type of continent? Also, where do they consider the border of europe and asia to be. I tell my students it's the ural mtns. in the north and Istanbul in the south, but I say the areas around the black and caspian seas are a little vague.
Do the caucus mtns constitute a europe / asia border? I'm mostly wondering what the european consensus would be about these questions. I once met a Syrian who insisted there wasn't a western or an eastern hemisphere, only northern and southern hemispheres. I'm not interested in the american point of view because I'm one myself, but if you're an american who has first hand experience with the european point of view, please share. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:47 pm Post subject: Re: Geography questions for non-americans |
|
|
ouyang wrote: |
I sometimes give a geographic place name lesson that I begin by asking the meaning of the olympic logo. The five rings stand for five continents. Americans recognize seven continents. The combination of north and south america as the americas is easy for me to explain, and the fact that antarctica is not habitable is the reason I tell my students that europeans don't consider it a continent. It's unlikely that there will ever be athletes representing antarctica.
. |
Antarctica is not a separate country, but a large land mass which is what a continent is. It was around long before the modern Olympics and the five rings. FWIW There are no athletes representing Asia or Africa in the Olympics. They represent their own countries, whereas Antarctica is not a country, nor is it owned by anybody. Just because its not a country doesnt not make it a continent like Africa and Americas etc.
Anyway Antarctica is inhabited. Just because its cold doesnt mean people don't live there. Scott Base, McMurdo sound on Antarctica are permanently manned year round with scientists and researcher from many of the Pacific Rim countries.
Last edited by PAULH on Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:50 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In Canada, we are taught that there are seven continents
N. America, S. America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa, and Antarctica. Couldn't tell you where the dividing line is for Europe/Asia.
Over here in Mexico, many believe that Central America is a continent, putting the dividing line either at the US/Mexico border, or lower, somewhere around Oaxaca, Mexico. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vre
Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In Britain we are taught 7 continents too.
Europe and Asia split here in Istanbul (in part) so it is a bit incontinent hehehe! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tamara

Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This very question has caused some very heated discussions between teachers and students here. Thanks for bringing it up. The sorest point is that there aren't two American continents (as you mentioned already), as the Panema Canal is man-made. It really riles them up to hear us talking about two continents. In fact, just to see a map in the classroom that shows the two continents marked with separate titles can start a whole tirade.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is also one of the reasons folks here in Latin America take umbrage at the use of the term "American" for a person from the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Couldn't tell you where the dividing line is for Europe/Asia.
|
I'm currently sitting in my living room in Europe, looking out over the water to Asia.
Does that mean that the dividing line is my appartment
dmb, Istanbul |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cardinal Synn
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 586
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vre wrote: |
In Britain we are taught 7 continents too.
Europe and Asia split here in Istanbul (in part) so it is a bit incontinent hehehe! |
So it's an In(ter)continent(al) Ballistic Turkey?
Resulting in a Nuclear Gobblecaust?
The Antarctic continent was divided up between lots of countries, long ago, though many of the "territories" overlap, causing grumpiness. When the rest of the planet has sucked the oil wells dry the doodah will hit the fan down there when they start fighting over the untapped black goodies. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forgive me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the scientific division of the continents related more to tectonic plates rather than political boundaries or shapes on the globe?
Then again, that might be wrong. I guess we would have to think of California as its own continent. Hey wait, maybe that works poltically too.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_b
Joined: 14 Oct 2003 Posts: 239 Location: Back in London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moonraven wrote: |
It is also one of the reasons folks here in Latin America take umbrage at the use of the term "American" for a person from the US. |
I've heard quite a few Latin Americans use "americano" as we use "American", but "Am�rica" is always for the whole lot, not just the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Spinoza

Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 194 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by Spinoza on Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ouyang

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: on them internets
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spinoza wrote: |
But - humble geographer that I am - it strikes me as fairly arbitrary and we should deem 'continents' to be human organizational constructs rather than objective features of the world.
|
Yes, but aren't these constructs useful for managing the immense amounts of diverse information that make up geography?
Spinoza wrote: |
Why aren't Europe/Asia/Africa a single continent? They are, after all, a single land mass. |
That's true, and Eurasia is commonly listed as one of six continents, but I wouldn' agree that "Eurafricasia is an island." or that "So are the Americas." According to plate tectonics, (which granted is not an exact science) north and south america were separated for over one hundred fifty million years before joining less than 5 million years ago.
The maps source is http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astronomy/planets/earth/Continents.shtml
A map showing an estimate of the world 14 million years ago can be found at http://www.scotese.com/miocene.htm
Spinoza wrote: |
Quote: |
I once met a Syrian who insisted there wasn't a western or an eastern hemisphere, only northern and southern hemispheres. |
There definitely is NOT a western/eastern hemisphere. There is no east/west Equator like there is north/south. |
I did four quick searches on Yahoo! and there are more results for "western hemisphere" than northern or southern hemisphere.
"Results 1 - 10 of about 722,000 for "western hemisphere"
Results 1 - 10 of about 64,600 for "eastern hemisphere"
Results 1 - 10 of about 607,000 for "northern hemisphere"
Results 1 - 10 of about 617,000 for "southern hemisphere" "
Saying that the western hemisphere doesn't exist is like saying time zones don't exist. They are both modern constructs based on longitude.
Check out The Myth of Continents at
http://homepage.smc.edu/morris_pete/continents.html if this sort of thing interests you. He says "five continents, not seven, is a standard ... taught throughout much of Europe." If that's the case, then I'm still hoping to hear from a German or Czech as to what word you use to classify Antarctica. If your five continent scheme includes Eurasia, then obviously you also consider Antarctica a continent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Spinoza

Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 194 Location: Saudi Arabia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by Spinoza on Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dajiang

Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 663 Location: Guilin!
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well.
In holland we're taught Antarctica is a continent. Actually, I think in most places people agree it's a continent.
And yeah, North and South America are two different continents according to our textbooks.
The dividing line between Europe and Asia, now that's a tricky one.
For me personally, I'd say Asia starts with Moscow. And Turkey is Asian too. Opinions vary on this subject though.
Cool picture of those moving plates btw.
Regards,
Dajiang |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ouyang

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Posts: 193 Location: on them internets
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spinoza, I think we just come from cultures that make different use of the word "hemisphere". In the United States, those areas that have a western longitude are considered inside the western hemisphere.
For us, the boundaries are as straightforward as the northern and southern hemispheres. As you are well aware, the prime meridian and the 180th meridian do not have either west or east designations, all other meridians do. The earth to the west of the prime meridian up to the 180th meridian is the western hemisphere.
It's a useful concept when referring to maps. We would refer to the left half of the maps above as the western hemisphere. Since the western hemisphere is also often placed on the right hand side of world maps this is the simplest way for us to indicate a world map's orientation. And there are many other occasions when we want to quickly indicate whether an area's longitude is eastern or western.
Our most authoritative geographic publisher in the states is National Geographic. They regularly use the term and we naturally follow their lead. See http://www.nationalgeographic.com/xpeditions/lessons/04/g35/foods.html
I really don't disagree with any of your reasoning. As an american, I just use different words and some words a little differently. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|