|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
marblez
Joined: 24 Oct 2004 Posts: 248 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:56 pm Post subject: Question for those who know UK education system grading |
|
|
I have noticed a lot of job advertisements ask for standards such as "A" levels, and honours degrees. I am assuming an "A" level is a grade standard. Is honours a 4 year degree (as compared to 3 years), or 4 years with additional coursework and high grades?
Can anyone help convert these into Canadian standards?
If I have a 4 year BA with a 3.4 average (sadly, fictional), what would that be considered?
Thanks for the help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lajzar
Joined: 09 Feb 2003 Posts: 647 Location: Saitama-ken, Japan
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
If there is a difference between a normal BA and a BA with honours in the UK, I am not aware of it. It certainly has nothing to do with your achievement or the degree length.
'A' level is a natioanl standard exam, usually taken by students at age 18. Typically a student will study only 3 subjects for the two years leading up to it, and take teh corresponding exams. Universities typically ask for a certain level of pass grades in A level exams as an entry requirement. UK universities do not normally set their own entrance exams. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
In Ontario, Canada, we used to have such "A" levels. They were called OAC's...Ontario Academic Credits, required as entrance to an Onatrio university. This was also called Grade 13, whereas grade 12 was all that was needed for a high school diploma. Ontario doesn't have these anymore, so I'm not sure we use as pre-reqs to university now. This ended sometime in the mid-90's.
I did my OAC's in English, English Writing, Physics, PoliSci, Economics, and Architectural Draughting. One needed 6 to enter uni, in my case journalism. Any younger Ontarians out there who can maybe let me know what the new system is? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guy, For university entrance, they just use the grades from the grade twelve subjects . I had OACs when I graduated- mine were in English, Creative Writing, Music (classical = mostly theory, harmony and composition) Music (jazz), French (FSL) French Literature (for FSL students) and German Language. I started university in Interdisciplinary Fine Arts Studies (a non-studio degree where you compare different fine arts and write essays) with an intention of specializing in Creative Writing and Fine Arts Studies, but then switched schools and double majored in Music History and English, although that was originally going to be a Music History and Creative Writing double major but the Creative Writing programme was cancelled).
There is also the standard reading and literacy test (but anyone planning to go on to university shouldn't have too much difficulty with that. The problem is some of the kids who are not intending on going on to university- they may have a big problem with it, and without passing it, they can't get their high school diploma, which means they cannot get into college either) that has caused a lot of debate in Ontario, and may have been overhauled, I don't really know. As far as I know, universities in Ontario don't use it for admissions- it's just a requirement of getting the high school diploma. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm...as I feared. Sounds like they've downgraded education in Ontario.
Carelton U had a Q year program for older students...pre study that replaced OACs for those who graduated with a high school diploma but no OAC's. Wonder if that's even more important these days. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marblez
Joined: 24 Oct 2004 Posts: 248 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, this is making more sense!
So I think the OAC is similar to BC's "Provincial" examinable courses. You need 4 of them for direct after high-school entrance into university. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
'A' level is a natioanl standard exam |
Just to confuse things. A levels are not normally offered in Scotttish schools. In Scotland students usually study 5 'highers' (for a year) for university entrance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guy Courchesne wrote: |
Hmmm...as I feared. Sounds like they've downgraded education in Ontario.
|
Yep. Less learning (only four years instead of five), more testing.
In a related area, the funding has also dropped (probably the real reason for having dropped the amount of time spent in high school and increased the amount of central tests is to cut back on the amount of teachers required, aka the education budget, while appearing to care what happens to the students. A surprising number of parents- the people who vote- feel that doing well on tests is what education is about). From today's Toronto Star
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout
/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1113217265594&call_pageid=968256289824&col=968342212737
(link on't work unless you copy and paste each of the two sections into the address bar- the link is long and it messes with the page format).
***
Study warns of 'quality gap' at Ontario universities
COLIN PERKEL
CANADIAN PRESS
Crammed lecture halls, overworked faculty and second-rate education will inevitably result if Ontario doesn't devote millions of dollars to closing the student-faculty gap at universities, warns a new report by the province's university professors.
The situation, already the worst in Canada, is set to deteriorate further with large numbers of existing faculty poised to retire even as more students than ever opt to go to university, says the report by the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Association.
"Ontario universities are scraping the bottom of the barrel in comparison to Canadian and U.S. competitors," warns the study released Monday.
"Unchecked, the quality gap continues to grow."
The report notes that Ontario ranks last among Canadian provinces with an average ratio of 24 students for each professor, well above the 15-to-one ratio considered optimal by the association.
To reach that "gold standard" by 2010 would require 11,000 new hires � more than 80 per cent of the existing workforce � at a cost of at least $700 million, and significantly more than that per year once all those new hires are made, the report concludes.
Just to remain at the current status quo, the province would need to increase current spending by five per cent to hire almost 2,650 faculty over the next five years.
"It's time to establish post-secondary education as one of the highest priorities for funding," said association president Michael Doucet.
"The future of the province in terms of its economy and social well-being depends on this."
The report notes that class sizes of more than 100 for first-year and second-year students have become common. Some schools have ended up with classes of more than 500, making it all but impossible for professors to provide any personal attention.
"Faculty are the lifeblood of a university," the report says. ``Their work as teachers, mentors, and researchers drives the institution, and student interaction with professors is the most important element of a high quality education."
In his review in February, former Ontario premier Bob Rae urged the government to spend another $1.3 billion a year to bring university funding up to the national average.
The faculty association is looking for a $300-million increase in operating funding in this spring's budget.
University employees represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees have also begun a campaign for more money.
Faced with a $6-billion deficit, Premier Dalton McGuinty has been fighting with Ottawa for more federal cash to plow into post-secondary education, which he said is key to the province's economic competitiveness.
"Ontario, Canada's economic engine, now ranks 10th out of 10 provinces when it comes to university funding," McGuinty said in a recent speech.
"This doesn't make sense, not when we're sending $23 billion to the federal government to support higher levels of funding in other provinces."
Just to return to the "middle-of-the-road" 18-to-one student-faculty ratio of 1995-96 � before funding cuts by both federal and provincial governments � would require hiring more than 7,000 new full-time professors, the analysis found.
***
Recently, there have are also been letters about an editorial concerning the situation in adult education in Ontario. On the one hand, the right to education ends at 16, on the other there are avenues to access education for adults (including adult ESL students) outside of the adult day school. On the other, it is a service that is badly needed within the province. The bottom line for people who teach it seems that pay and benefits will continue to be very minimal (including the use of volunteers) and nobody will do anything about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
3plus1
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all,
As a UK undergraduate student, I thought I'd help clear up the qualifications for you!
An A-level is the name given to the type of qualification most pupils study for in their final year of secondary school. Generally speaking, most people leave with 3 or 4 of these and can use them to get into university anywhere in the UK. (Depending on how good they are, of course!)
An Advanced Higher is the Scottish equivalent. Most Scottish students who finish secondary school leave with 3 of these and can use them to get into English universities. However, in Scotland, you can leave school a year earlier if you really want to, with only Highers. Pupils tend to get 5 or so of these qualifications. They tend to be the basis for Advanced Highers, but pupils can go straight to a Scottish university with only Highers if they so wish. This means that Scottish degree courses are one year longer than English ones - if you think about it, they're basically just catching up for that year they never finished at school. If you have good Advanced Highers, you can usually enter the 2nd year of a Scottish degree course. (Because you've probably covered the 1st year content in your last year of school.)
Most degree courses such as BAs run for 4 years in Scotland and 3 years in England. I've already explained the difference in length. Languages degrees will generally last for an additional year (i.e. 5 years in Scotland and 4 in England) because this allows the students to go abroad for one year during their degree.
If you finish your degree course (however long it's meant to be) and pass all your modules well, you will generally graduate with honours. If however you struggle in your penultimate year, your tutors may refuse you entry into the honours stream and you will graduate with an ordinary degree instead. It's still a degree, but it's not as good. It's hard to get accepted to study a postgraduate degree with only an ordinary undergraduate degree, but it is possible.
Degrees have different classes, or grades, if you like. The top one is called a First, the next best one is called a 2:1, after that comes a 2:2 and finally a Third. Anything else is called a Fail! A First is basically a brilliant degree and should pretty much guarentee you a job if there is any justice in this world, a 2:1 is really good, and a 2:2 is respectable, but more and more people have these, so you are essentially just average. A Third is pretty much useless - so many people in the UK have degrees nowadays that you need a good one for it to have any value. Think about it: if you were an employer and gazillons of people came to you with 2:2s, why would you want someone who had a Third?
Any more questions, please ask
Cheers,
S x |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to blame 6-toe Harris for this, but Squinty McGuinty ain't any better. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cardinal Synn
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 586
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to add to what 3plus1 said. Although Scottish honour degree courses last 4 years, many of them get you an MA at the end of these four years (science courses of the same length tend to be BSCs). It's confusing, I know. The general rule is that an honours degree lasts 1 year longer than an ordinary degree. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In English universites honours degrees are three year courses. Ordinary, or pass degrees are what you get if you flunk, but not so irreltrievably badly that they can't give you anything at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carde
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 Posts: 13 Location: Edinburgh but not for long!!!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've never heard of the final year gaining you an MA but I do know that the 4th year of a Scottish degree is the honours year in which you specialise much more than in other years and have to submit a project or dissertation. You can graduate after 3 years but you only get an ordinary degree. This is very different from English unis where you get honours automatically with just the 3 years (unless you do really badly) - I can see how this and the grading system would be confusing to people from outside the UK! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carde
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 Posts: 13 Location: Edinburgh but not for long!!!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I've just remembered I was having this very conversation with my mum and dad the other week there and they told me that an MA in Scotland is the equivalent of a BA in England and Masters courses here are MSCs rather than MAs (they're both lecturers here so I guess they would know). Also, to back this up, I was looking at post grad qualifications in translation and I noticed that the one I wanted to do in Scotland was an MSC and the ones in England were all MAs - even more confusing! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carde
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 Posts: 13 Location: Edinburgh but not for long!!!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I've just remembered I was having this very conversation with my mum and dad the other week there and they told me that an MA in Scotland is the equivalent of a BA in England and Masters courses here are MSCs rather than MAs (they're both lecturers here so I guess they would know). Also, to back this up, I was looking at post grad qualifications in translation and I noticed that the one I wanted to do in Scotland was an MSC and the ones in England were all MAs - even more confusing! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|