View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
xnihil

Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 92 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2003 6:10 pm Post subject: Relative Clauses and unclear antecedents |
|
|
This question came up on a test yesterday and none of our colleagues can come up with a satisfactory answer with explanation. I thought I'd see if anyone here cares to tackle it:
Give me the name of one of the students who _____ passed the test.
a. has
b. have
Now, aside from the fact that it is a slightly awkward sentence ("...who passed the test" is a much clearer answer), can someone choose the correct answer and then explain it?
BTW, there was an interesting grammatical issue highlighted in the WP this morning about a disputed question on the PSATs. I plan on sharing it with my students to demonstrate the fallibility of dogmatic grammatical rules.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A51947-2003May13?language=printer |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2003 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The correct answer is a (has) because this relative clause is modifying the word "one", which is singular. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xnihil

Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 92 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2003 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How can you tell that "one" is the word being modified and not "students"? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2003 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The sentence would read:
"Give me the names or the students who have passed the test."
One is used to specify the amount in question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
andrew murphy

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 51 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would have thought that the antecedent is "name" therefore requiring the singular "has". After all it is the "name" that one is requesting, not the "students". You could rephrase the sentence thus: "Give me the name of the student who has passed" or "Give me the name of one who has passed" which is different from: "Give me the names of the students who have passed". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
"one" is the subject of the subordinated clause, therefore it has to be 'has' (the verb has to agree with the subject 'one'). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Round de Bloc
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1946
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 2:07 am Post subject: My logic |
|
|
But, Andrew, can a name pass a test? I'd say the antecedent has to be either one or students. If we rearrange the order of the sentence to say, Of the students who has/have passed the test, give me the name of one, I'd have to go with have.
However, my logic might be off. It's been a long day.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M@tt
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 473 Location: here and there
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 3:03 am Post subject: another idea |
|
|
It's have, unless you put a comma after "students", making a restrictive relative clause that refers to the one student (among all the students) who passed the test.
1. Give me the name of one of the students who have passed the test.
2. Give me the name of one of the students, who has passed the test.
It helps if you think of the noun phrase in the first sentence: "the students who have passed the test". Or you could reword it: Give me the name of one student among the students who have passed the test. Then it becomes clear that the verb should be have.
I think those are the only two options, and they have different meanings. The second one is awkward sounding, but correct.
Last edited by M@tt on Thu May 15, 2003 5:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
andrew murphy

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 51 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 5:37 am Post subject: second thoughts |
|
|
Woops! Oh, yes, you're quite right Ben Round de Bloc. The relative pronoun for "name" would be "which". The "who" therefore points to "one" or "students". It would seem that the qualification or restriction "one" is the antecedent therefore requiring the singular "has". The trap here seems to be reaching to the closest word to the relative clause, which here is "students", when I believe that "one of the students" needs to be taken as a whole.
I'm afraid I'm not convinced, M@att, that the insertion of a comma before the relative clause is required for the "has" solution. If one reads these two possilities out aloud it seems to me that the "correct standard english" sense requires "has". The other solution, emphasising the students, would look something like this: "Give me the name of one of those students who have passed the test."
Chew this cud over! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
After chewing my cud for a while, I think M@tt's comma theory should be the inverse.
"Give me the name of one of the students, who have passed the test."
Here the restrictive relative clause is used for emphasis on the good students.
"Give me the name of one of the students who has passed the test."
Here the non-restrictive relative clause is used to give necessary information with no emphasis.
Another poster's sentence,
"Of the students who have passed the test, give me the name of one."
Here the emphasis is on the students and thus the verb is plural. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xnihil

Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 92 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guest,
If I'm not mistaken, a restrictive clause does not take a comma.
Go to the other room and grab a chair which has a broken leg. (restrictive: I want to tell the broken chair apart from the others)
Go to the other room and grab the chair, which has a broken leg.
(non-restrictive: there is only one chair in there and it happens to have a broken leg)
"Give me the name of one of the students who have passed the test."
restricts the pool from which the name may be selected, IMHO, thus requiring the plural verb.
I can't seem to find anyone to agree with me, however.
Andrew, I don't think that inserting "those" into the sentence does anything. If it took "have" without it, it will still take it, and vice versa.
Thanks for all the input, everyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I could easily have been mistaken as to which was which. I don't have a grammar book handy to check. I'm teaching really really low level students now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 2:50 pm Post subject: It's all relative |
|
|
My two cents worth:
It should be " have ".
" Give me the name of one of the students who have passed the test. "
The relative clause is modifying " students ".
For example,
" One of the students who is/are in this class is absent. "
" Are " would be correct choice.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 3:10 pm Post subject: A tense moment |
|
|
Whoa - I just realized. It's a " trick question ", in a way. We've all been barking up the wrong tree. The tense is wrong. It should read:
" Give me the name of one of the students who passed the test ".
The action's over - in the past. The passing or failing happened when the tests were graded. After all, we don't say:
" So, how many of your students HAVE passed ( or failed ) the quiz ".
We say
" So, how many of your students passed ( or failed ) the quiz".
Regards,
John
Last edited by johnslat on Thu May 15, 2003 3:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xnihil

Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 92 Location: Egypt
|
Posted: Thu May 15, 2003 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good eye John, but I have to respectfully disagree. Remember, the present perfect can be used for situations that occurred in the past but have an impact on the present. For example, I might say:
I have lost my keys (Implying that I can't drive my car right now).
I could say : "I lost my keys" but I could also use the present perfect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|