View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 3:58 pm Post subject: Continued |
|
|
Quote: |
Most German graduate programs have 12 students or less...
Wrong again. |
Asiatraveller, it is amazing that someone who is a teacher and is so highly educated as yourself would state that someone is wrong without giving any information to support your claim. I guess you just tell your students that they are wrong without giving them a reason.
The point was that the University of Delaware offers about the same number of German Literature classes as other German Graduate programs such as Harvard and Penn. One reason is that in comparison to other fields there are not a lot of people doing advanced degrees in German Literature.
It seems that you were partially correct that German graduate programs have more than 12 students but even though Harvard has 21 students only about 12-15 are currently taking classes since the others have finished their course work and are working on their dissertation. Resulting in only three German graduate courses being offered. The same amount of classes that are being offered at what you call a "backwater" program.
Last edited by JZer on Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:48 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asiatraveller reiterated,
Quote: |
And for your information, the reputable German graduate programs are offered in Departments of German in the U.S. Yours is simply in a Department of Foreign Languages, as is common in lower-tier programs (i.e., "backwater"). |
...and I guess that professors with Ph.D.s from Yale and John Hopkins would choose to teach in backwater programs such as the University of Delaware.
I will reiterate that the University of Delaware might not have a German MA program that would be considered in the top 10 in the U.S. but it is absurd to call it "backwater". A program that has professors who earned Ph.D.s from schools that are in the top ten in the field cannot realistically be considered backwater. Secondly all of the professors publish regularly.
Here is a link to the only study that I know of that actually ranks German Ph.D. programs It is a little old but it is the only real data that we can go off of(The study is from the national research council):
http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~jnewton/nrc_rankings/nrc1.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zero Hero
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 944
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try not to be too hard on the poor 'Asia Traveller'; he is clearly delusional and may possibly be turning senile. He very recently described Hong Kong as a "backwater", too (one of his favourite terms of late), which will certainly strike anyone who has actually been here as a tad odd (to say the very least).
He is also a linguist-wannabe, and is used to being able to throw sand gleaned from a cursory reading of popular science introductions to the field into the eyes of those who are untrained in this area, as evinced by his stating Chomsky's Standard Theory was published in 1969 when in fact it is 1965, as even a green undergraduate would know. To put this into perspective for you as you may not be familiar with the material, to computational linguists such as myself trained in the Chomsky Hierarchy, Turing Machines, and Generative Grammar, this is akin to forgetting one's own birthday or name.
He is also prone to attacking posters till the thread gets locked. Indeed, it is somewhat rare to see a locked thread that doesn't have his name as the final poster, again as even a brief perusal of the various forums shows.
He also does not shy away from sheer slander (though it is possible that his juvenile mentality may not be quite able to comprehend this concept and so this may simply be immaturity). For evidence of this I simply suggest you look at the STD thread on the HK forum. According to him, one must have actually been to the North Pole to know it is cold.
All in all, quite an objectionable poster. My advice would simply be to ignore him. This is what most do. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. Talk about needing to get the last word in.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a crock, anyway.
I don't believe that JZer is studying for a MA in German.
I think he is a 15 year-old with lots of zits and no girlfriend on the horizon. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moonraven once posted:
Quote: |
He also doesn't understand that if you are xenophobic, YOU can't be the foreigner. It only applies to having a negative attitude to foreigners coming to YOUR country. |
Moonraven, just like I can't believe that you have a Ph.D. from the University of Massachusetts.
How could someone with a Ph.D. not understand that you can still be xenophobic even if you are in another country? The locals are still foreign from the prospective of a foreigner, so it is still possible to be xenophobic when a person is in another country. No part of the defintion states that it only applies to foreigners coming to your country.
Last edited by JZer on Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:52 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a point to this thread? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
None whatsoever Gordon; nevertheless...
JZer wrote: |
Moonraven once posted:
Quote: |
He also doesn't understand that if you are xenophobic, YOU can't be the foreigner. It only applies to having a negative attitude to foreigners coming to YOUR country. |
How could someone with a Ph.D. not understand that you can still be xenophobic even if you are in another country? The locals are still foreign from the prospective of a foreigner, so it is still possible to be xenophobic when a person is in another country. No part of the defintion states that it only applies to foreigners coming to your country. |
'fraid not JZer; if 'xeno' means outsider then xenophobia relates to fear or hatred of outsiders. The 'locals'nay still be foreign from the perspective of the (minority)outsider but only s/he can be the outsider. You seem to be confusing xenophiobia with rascism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
xeno means foreign, strange
Here is an example. John is a Canadian who is xenophobic. His company assigns him to work in Peru. When he moves to Peru he can still be xenophobic because he is affraid of what is strange or foreign. When we talk about John the Canadian that lives in Peru is xenophobic, the perspective of what is foreign is from the person or group of people that we are talking about. It does not matter whether the person or group of people that are xenophobic are the minority or majority in society since the other group of people are strange from their viewpoint of the observer.
John is xenophobic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is the defintion of xenophobia from an etymological dictionary.
Xenophobia - "An Irrational Fear of Foreign or Strange Things." See "xen-" and "-phobia."
http://www.panikon.com/phurba/alteng/x.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gordon wrote: |
Is there a point to this thread? |
I think ls650 got it: needing to get the last word in.
d |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I think ls650 got it: needing to get the last word in.
d |
Was the point of your comment any different than any of the other posters? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dyak

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 630
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Then clearly the last word should be, 'JZerphobia' - the very rational fear of reading sheer drivel and wasting valuable seconds of one's life. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moonraven
Joined: 24 Mar 2004 Posts: 3094
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I second that.
Some people--especially 15 year-olds with zits and nothing to do but play with their....computers don't understand, or don't care to understand, that this is a forum for ESL professionals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zero Hero
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 944
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2005 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do ESL professionals resort to describing other posters as "15 year-olds with zits" who have "nothing to do but play with their....computers"?
What are the unprofessional ones like then?
The hardest person to be honest and candid with is the one in the mirror. Isn't that right, 'Moonraver'? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|