|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
misteradventure
Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:31 am Post subject: Polish Citizenship for Descendants |
|
|
It appears that descendants may be considered Polish citizens in the event their parents never formally renounced their POLISH citizenship in front of a POLISH consular or embassy official, according to the Constitution.
Anyone familiar with this? My inlaws would be LIVID if they found out that they were not only ethnically but legally polacks as well! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CROGO
Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 46 Location: Krakow
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:14 am Post subject: Polish Citizenship for Descendants |
|
|
If your purpose here is to piss off your in-laws, they would first have to CLAIM Polish citizenship by decent from one or more Polish citizens. (Not an easy process to prove the claim. One must provide official birth records and marriage licenses and then translate them into Polish.) Even if one could claim Polish citizenship, many won�t because of concerns of military service (males) or tax obligations. The use of �citizenship� in the Polish constitution may be defined differently than you understand the term. It may be that �citizenship� refers to the right to live in Poland. Stalin involuntarily deported thousands of Poles to Russia after he and Hitler partitioned Poland to start WWII. The Poles are still rather sensitive about this. (The Poles recently demanded an investigation in Stalin�s murder of 25,700 Polish officers in 1940 in Katyn forest near Smolensk in Russia.) In recent years the Polish government has recognized citizenship claims of those involuntarily deported to Russia, and their descendents. Individuals who left Poland voluntarily, and their descendents, may not be treated as kindly.
To those actually in Poland, I would be curious if there is much talk there about the situation in Ukraine, and the issue of the Polish-Ukrainian border. The present border is that which Stalin imposed, and not the 1920 border agreed to by Lenin. The Poles never really agreed to the present border and the loss of East Galicia. Any talk of the Poles reclaiming it if Ukraine implodes?
Last edited by CROGO on Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CROGO
Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 46 Location: Krakow
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alex Shulgin
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 553
|
Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt that Poland will be trying to get Lvov back from Ukraine any time soon. Yes Poles do still Lvov as a Polish city but they also see Szczecin, Wroclaw, Slupsk, Koszalin, Ketrzyn etc as Polish cities (even if those were German cities for a few hundred years) and realise that they have to choose which Polish cities are inside Poland. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CROGO
Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 46 Location: Krakow
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Yes Poles �have to choose which Polish cities are inside Poland."
Alex, as much as I appreciate your contributions to this forum, when did the Poles have a choice about which cities remained inside Poland? Who offered them this choice? Stalin?
WWII starts when the Germans invaded Poland and the Russians invaded from the other side 17 days later. (While of course the British and French armies sat on their hands and did nothing to help their treaty ally.) Stalin deported Poles from the sector of Poland that the Soviets occupied and executed Polish military officers in violation of the Geneva Convention. When the Germans invade Russia they exhume the mass grave of the Polish officers in Katyn. The Red Cross investigates and everyone knew that the Russians were responsible for the massacre. The Polish government in exile, established according to the pre-war Polish Constitution demanded an explanation from Stalin. Stalin blamed the Germans, set up a puppet communist government in Lublin, and refused to negotiate with the Polish government in exile in London.
Stalin stated that the Poles demand for an explanation for the massacre from the Russians evidenced bad faith towards Russia. (Gorbachev would later admit the truth in 1989. The Russians executed the Polish officers. The London Poles maintained a government in exile until Solidarity and Lech Walensa toppled the communist regime.) Stalin dictated Poland�s present Eastern border. The Lublin communists agreed to it, but they were never a legitimate government of Poland. Recently, in the midst of the Ukrainian Presidential turmoil the Polish government again demanded an investigation of the massacre of the Polish officers at Katyn. When the Poles speak of this, they are implicitly questioning the border.
The reality is that in 1920, the Soviets invaded Poland in order to export their revolution to the rest of Europe. The Poles beat them back badly. Lenin offered the Poles half of Ukraine, which the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth had previously ruled prior to the partitions of Poland. The Poles refused, in large part because they did not want a vindictive peace treaty with such a large neighbor. The 1920 border was not dictated by the Poles to the Russians as Stalin asserted. It is true that the Potsdam conference decided that Germany's border should shift, but it never ratified Stalin�s annexation of Polish land or the communist puppet government in Poland. Just as WWII started with the Nazi invasion of Poland, the Cold War started with Russian interference in Poland. After WWI plebiscites were conducted to determine where borders should be drawn. Hitler and Stalin simply deported people whose nationality was inconvenient.
Nor is the former German territory equal to that portion of Poland annexed to the USSR. Germany had started two World Wars, and lost them both. Germany deserved to lose territory. Poland fought against the Germans in both. No one fought the Germans longer than the Poles. No Pole of any stature collaborated with the Nazi�s. There was no Marshall Petain in Poland. The Polish army fought on all fronts. The the Kosciuszko Squadron of the Polish airforce fought the battle of Britain. The Polish navy fought the Germans for the entire war from allied ports. Britain�s Treaty with the Poles required that the Poles be consulted in any peace treaty. I am a historian, and to the best of my research neither the British of or American government ever recognized the Soviet annexation of Polish land.
Ukraine wants to join the EU. The Poles and Lithuanians want them to join. If Ukraine joins the EU, it must accept the jurisdiction of the EU's courts. What would happen in a descendant from Lvov demanded his land back? It would be interesting. What happened to the Poles in the after math of WWII was wrong. Harold Macmillan comments that no Englishman or American can read about what happened in Poland without feeling a sense of shame.
The only argument for the border to remain where Stalin drew it is time. But this argument does not apply to land in Berlin, why should it apply to the Polish border? I don�t think the Poles have forgot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alex Shulgin
Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 553
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
CROGO wrote: |
"Yes Poles �have to choose which Polish cities are inside Poland."
Alex, as much as I appreciate your contributions to this forum, when did the Poles have a choice about which cities remained inside Poland? |
They have the choice now. It would be very tough indeed for Poland to try and reclaim the territory lost in 1945 while holding onto what was gained. They could say to Germany "We'll give back German territory if you help us get back our former lands". But they don't
CROGO wrote: |
Germany had started two World Wars, and lost them both. Germany deserved to lose territory. |
Er, which law (EU or otherwise) are you basing the assessment of what Germany deserved/deserves? It is my opinion that dubya shrub is a war criminal who deserves to be executed for his crimes. However until he's found guilty by a competent international court, I'd be charged with murder for giving him what he deserves. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CROGO
Joined: 15 Mar 2004 Posts: 46 Location: Krakow
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alex Shulgin wrote: |
CROGO wrote: |
"Yes Poles …have to choose which Polish cities are inside Poland."
Alex, as much as I appreciate your contributions to this forum, when did the Poles have a choice about which cities remained inside Poland? |
They have the choice now. It would be very tough indeed for Poland to try and reclaim the territory lost in 1945 while holding onto what was gained. They could say to Germany "We'll give back German territory if you help us get back our former lands". But they don't
CROGO wrote: |
Germany had started two World Wars, and lost them both. Germany deserved to lose territory. |
Er, which law (EU or otherwise) are you basing the assessment of what Germany deserved/deserves? It is my opinion that dubya shrub is a war criminal who deserves to be executed for his crimes. However until he's found guilty by a competent international court, I'd be charged with murder for giving him what he deserves. |
By what law do I make the assessment of what Germany deserved/deserves? The peace treaties that the German governments signed with the various allied powers. Treaties between nations, ratified by their legitimate governments, are in fact laws. Mr. Shulgin, regardless of your assertions and personal opinions, the assessment of what Germany deserved was made by all of the allied powers following the war, and duly recorded in history. It is not merely my personal opinion. Specifically the big three, Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin, concluded and signed a memorandum at Yalta on February 11, 1945. The statement was duly published on February 13, 1945:
“III. DISMEMBERMENT OF GERMANY
It was agreed that Article 12 (a) of the Surrender terms for Germany should be amended to read as follows:
"The United Kingdom, the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics shall possess supreme authority with respect to Germany. In the exercise of such authority they will take such steps, including the complete dismemberment of Germany as they deem requisite for future peace and security."
The rest of the allied powers, Poland, France, Holland, Belgium, and Norway, et al. concurred, as did Czechoslovakia. In less than 70 years of existence, the German nation had provoked one war, and then brutally invaded its neighbors in the following two World Wars. Each war was more terrible, destructive and barbaric than the last. The conduct of the German war machine in Word War II remains a standard of horror and barbarism on a scale unsurpassed in history. I shall not repeat the grisly details here, unless someone here demonstrates his/her ignorance of history.
On May 7, 1945 at 2.41 AM, at General Eisenhower's headquarters in a school house in Reims, France, General Gustav Jodl, the representative of the German High Command and of Grand Admiral Doenitz, the designated head of the German State, signed the act of unconditional surrender of all German land, sea and air forces in Europe to the Allied Expeditionary Force, and, simultaneously, to the Soviet High Command. Thus ended (in Europe) the bloodiest war in human history, and with it the independence of the German state until the reunification of Germany in October 1990. In 1990, during negotiations for German reunification, the East and West German legislatures agreed to recognize the inviolability of the Polish-German border. Berlin, which had been partitioned into four zones, remained under formal military occupation by the allied powers until September 12, 1990. On this date, the two German governments, East and West, signed the”Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany” along with the U.S., Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union. This treaty is the final peace treaty between the respective nations and restored German sovereignty. On March 15, 1991, Germany signed a separate treaty with Poland confirming their present border, the Oder-Neisse line. As previously stated, treaties between Nations are laws. When a nation engages in a war of aggression and then loses badly, it must expect to lose territory and/or make reparations in the resulting peace treaty. Nations like individuals must be held accountable for bad conduct.
So if the Poles offer to give Silesia and Pomerania back to the Germans, the Germans will guarantee that Poland's borders are restored to its pre war limits? Pre-war Poland included Wilno, presently Vilnus, the capital of Lithuania, Eastern Galicia and Wolyn, now claimed by Ukraine, and a large swath of lower Lithuania, what is now called Belarus, the last communist dictatorship in Europe. German influence is unlikely to restore these borders. Under what circumstance will Lithuania give up its capital? The thought boggles the mind!
Since the Russians were threatening to slice off the Russian speaking Eastern part of Ukraine during the turmoil over Ukraine’s Presidential election, I had simply asked what was being heard about the issue in Poland. The Polish government at this time demanded an investigation into the Katyn forrest massacre. Since Stalin used the Poles reaction to his crimes at Katyn as a pretext to set up a puppet government in Warsaw to agree to the present borders, the Poles were implicitly questioning the border. The timing was not a coincidence. Considering the historic bonds between Poland and Lithuania, Vilnus-Wilno is the easiest city for the Poles to give up. The city of Lwow is a different matter. Prior to the war this was never under Russian control and the Ukrainians were a minority of the population there. Stalin coveted Lwow because there was a small oilfield nearby. The Poles certainly want to support Ukraine's escape from Russian influence, but the unknown soldier buried under the arches in Warsaw died defending Lwow. I don’t think the Poles will forget Lwow.
The reality is that Poland is now the Eastern border of the EU, and NATO. Expanding the EU or NATO into the Republics of the former Soviet Union, as Ukrainian President Yushenko desires, requires addressing Stalin’s post war conduct. Stalin grabbed as much territory for the U.S.S.R. as possible at the expense of all of its neighbors, not just Poland. Ukraine gained territory after the war not only from Poland, but also Bessarabia and northern Bukovina from Romania, and the Ruthanian province from Czechoslovakia. Like East Galicia in Poland these provinces were never part of Russia or the U.S.S.R. before WWII. If Ukraine wants to join the club, it may have to address its borders with its neighbors, and not just Poland.
Once in the EU, Ukraine would have to recognize and abide by decisions of the EU courts. These decisions would apply to border disputes, and also regarding the rights of those born in Ukraine who wish to claim citizenship elsewhere. Poland is much more ethnically homogenous than it was before the war. Poland had been a great empire once. As such it was composed of different ethnic groups, and religions. Hitler exterminated most of the Jewish population, but Stalin forcibly moved people around due to their ethnicity with a disregard for their wishes and citizenship. Many Ukrainians, Orthodox and Catholics, who lived within the borders of present day Poland prior to the war held Polish citizenship. Stalin forcibly deported them to present day Ukraine. The same forcible ethnic cleansing also took place in Poland, of ethnic Belarussians (formerly called Lithuanians) who held Polish citizenship, to Belarus. These people and their descendants are by Polish law, Polish citizens. The President of Belarus wants to reunite Belarus with Russia, and Putin is mourning the collapse of the former Soviet Union. Considering Russian response the U.S. Sectratry of State’s recent statement that the President of Belarus is a dictator, this situation bears careful watch. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|