|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lesgrin
Joined: 20 May 2005 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: who knows about angelina cafe recruiting company? |
|
|
what experience did you have with angelina's recruitment co.? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stavrogin2001
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 92 Location: Liaoning
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have heard good things, but when I talked to them before I asked for school information before they applied for the positions, but they insisted on having all my documents and applying for the position before they would give me any info. So I stopped all contact with them.
Last edited by stavrogin2001 on Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rickinbeijing
Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Beijing, China
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
lesgrin,
Angelina's Cafe, which steals "Cafe" from Dave's, is a front for a government recruiting agency. The other one is "ChinaJob." I found both to be unreliable in followup correspondence when questions needed answered. Typical Chinese bureaucratic baloney. Better to contact the schools they list yourself but don't expect to negotiate a better salary, just get more fluid lines of communication. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YoungBuck
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 Posts: 82 Location: Hangzhou, China
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
From everyone I've talked to I've heard nothing but bad things when it comes to recruiters. I don't see why this one would be any different |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mac
Joined: 18 Apr 2003 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They had contacted me and asked me for all of my documents so I sent them and I have heard nothing from them. I sent them my documents during the spring break. I received an email from them saying that they had received my documents. As what the other poster had said it is better to contact the schools you are interested in yourself. You then can negotiate directly without a middleman. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
frigginhippie
Joined: 13 Mar 2004 Posts: 188 Location: over here
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
can i quote myself?
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/job/viewtopic.php?p=233437&highlight=#233437
They contact people qualified for available positions. If you make a request but the position is fillled, or you don't meet the school's criteria, no call. Also, they want all your info before they share the school so that you don't go directly to the school. They are, after all, a business. That's how they make money. My good friend in our FAO said the schools pay Angelina's, then send the receipt to the government to get a refund. I trust him.
-FH |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mac
Joined: 18 Apr 2003 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well all I can say in my case is that they had all of my info before the winter break and as far as my qualifications goes I have been teaching esl for over 7 years now in three different countries. Thry sent me an email acknowledging that they received all of my documents and then not one word since from them. Someone posted on here about two months ago that Angelina's cafe pays you your salary not the school. For me I would be a little hesitant about this situation. Depending which school you went to if you had a problem with getting paid you would have to deal with the agency that would be faraway from where you are. Just something to think about! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
frigginhippie
Joined: 13 Mar 2004 Posts: 188 Location: over here
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm. I can't speak for anyone else on this forum, but last year Angelina's replied to me quickly, and I signed a decent contract in under a month. They didn't try to change any info or push unwanted offers on me. My coworkers maintain open communications with their staff, searching for a new Fall position. Try adding Angelina's email to MSN Messenger. They're online during business hours.
My school pays my salary. The FAO secretary brings it to my door every month. I've been informed that Angelina's received a one-time recruiting fee of a few thousand for each white head at my school. Standard operating procedure.
-FH |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rickinbeijing
Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Beijing, China
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
frighip,
You mean they collect a "bounty," capish?
You may have had good luck but in general I stand by my assertions. This outfit--and Chinajob--does not operate professionally as a referral agency. If they don't want you for whatever reason, they don't contact you. Now THAT is standard operating procedure in China, home of the authoritarian attitude, "We'll tell you only when WE feel you have a need to know." Not just a hangover from Communism but a bad cultural trait, I'm afraid.
Contact universities and colleges directly. The money they save on letting others find you CAN become a salary negotiation point. Oh, yes, it can. When dealing with Chinese, always always be cutthroat or you'll wind up both the loser and the fool. That's true whether it's a teaching contract or WTO.
It's just a fact, Jack. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stavrogin2001
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 92 Location: Liaoning
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
frigginhippie I think that you might have done well with them and I think that is great, my only point was that after 3 years of ESL in North America and 4 years of ESL in China, I should be qualified for most jobs that they are offering. But still after asking for any information about the locations and school names both on messenger and in email, I was told only to send documents and wait.
After having been here for awhile, I do not feel that this is standard business practice and I also feel it gives it a bit of a dishonest air. Anyone that has been teaching for awhile will want to know what schools they are applying for first. If they really wanted to put teachers first they could send and email telling the prospective teacher what positions that they qualify for before applying.
I think that these services are mostly aiming at greenhorns that are fresh in China and don't really know their choices to begin with. In this way it is easier to herd them to the jobs that Angelina needs to fill.
Whether or not they are good or not in terms of honesty and reliability, I don't know, I just think they could be more upfront. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
writpetition
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 213
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Angelina's is racist and passportist - and shamelessly, too! I've corresponded with them but they've not had the decency even to respond.
Something will happen, at some point of time, a la the SARS aftermath when academia China found itself woefully short of English teachers, and then Angelina's and their ilk will probably respond to applications from my kind... Viva Angelina's... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
frigginhippie
Joined: 13 Mar 2004 Posts: 188 Location: over here
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to hear you all haven't heard back from Angelina's. Questions not meant antagonistically:
1.) If it's a skin issue, I have to ask, did you honestly expect otherwise? Every school/recruiter/academy I've met requires a photo first. I don't believe they themselves are racist. They are meeting the demands of the students, or better, the students' parents, who put a (groundless) premium on a light exterior. This is the current state of the ESL market in most countries. It's awful you are subject to unfounded discrimination (reading your previous posts), but you did choose China, and with years of experience, must understand the situation.
2.) If they did not reply, how do you know they are 'passportist'? Judging by the number of unanswered applicants, it does not seem to be related to nationality or ethnicity, but rather discourtesy.
3.) With such EFL experience, why go to a recruiter who offers base salary and conditions to all applicants? You should be qualified for much more than 3500 for 20hrs, and probably already have a better post than those offered by nearly all recruiting companies.
4.) If you were a recruiter (i know, i know), would you release all the school's info so a potential client could contact directly before you could claim a finder's fee?
5.) Have you never sent away a letter and CV to a company back home, been told to wait, and never contacted? Monster.com is the world's leader in "we'll get back to you". I don't think it's fair to call it:
Quote: |
Not just a hangover from Communism but a bad cultural trait |
6.) the 'bounty' was a single 3000rmb recruiting fee, about half of S. Korea/Japan fees, but yes, high for China. Reasonable, and of course used as a tactic in negotiations
Okay, so #6 wasn't a question. But for the first 5, I'm suggesting looking at the lens, not through it, to better understand what's being seen. The same flaws we find in others...
Forgive me. I'll step down now.
-FH |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
writpetition
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 213
|
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frigginhippie,
Quote: |
1.) If it's a skin issue, I have to ask, did you honestly expect otherwise? Every school/recruiter/academy I've met requires a photo first. I don't believe they themselves are racist. They are meeting the demands of the students, or better, the students' parents, who put a (groundless) premium on a light exterior. This is the current state of the ESL market in most countries. It's awful you are subject to unfounded discrimination (reading your previous posts), but you did choose China, and with years of experience, must understand the situation.
|
On the one hand you ask what one expected, then you suggest that the company is not racist. So, on the one hand you expect a 'darkie' to be rejected because of his/her skin coulour. On the other, you exonerate the rejectors from any possibility of being racists. Pray, on what may I ask, do you base this judgement or exoneration, regardless of your own contradiction?
Anyway, you're very condesecending about the whole issue, passing on all the blame to parents, students and China in general. So, are you suggesting that all Chinese are racists? And, passportists? And, do I sense a certain smugness in your post? And, does that in some way imply that you subscribe to these ideas? Or do you feel that one who has been discriminated against had better shut up, accept that as his lot and forget about the whole thing so that the perpetrators feel no sense of guilt or remorse and that they may sleep? Is that what you would like?
Quote: |
If they did not reply, how do you know they are 'passportist'? Judging by the number of unanswered applicants, it does not seem to be related to nationality or ethnicity, but rather discourtesy |
If an application is rejected once, you're right. If a second and a thrid and a fourth and a fifth...and...rejected...year after year...what do you expect one to believe? That he's just plain unlucky? Angelina's keeps rejecting, but one does get jobs/job offers anyway from other universities/colleges, then what is one to make of it? Grow up and face facts! I, for one, will call a spade a spade, especially where discrimination, racism and passportism are concerned. In fact, all of Angelina's posts clearly mention passport requirements. So, what is that supposed to mean? That they are not passportists?
Quote: |
With such EFL experience, why go to a recruiter who offers base salary and conditions to all applicants? You should be qualified for much more than 3500 for 20hrs, and probably already have a better post than those offered by nearly all recruiting companies |
Sure, and I have had better jobs than these. But, until one finds a suitable position, why mustn't one try and look for opportunities? BTW, you went to them yourself...so do you then acknowledge that you're at the bottom of the heap? I quote again from one of your posts
Quote: |
Hmm. I can't speak for anyone else on this forum, but last year Angelina's replied to me quickly, and I signed a decent contract in under a month. They didn't try to change any info or push unwanted offers on me. My coworkers maintain open communications with their staff, searching for a new Fall position. Try adding Angelina's email to MSN Messenger. They're online during business hours. |
.
So, are you also their spokesperson? Why have you taken on the role of an apologist for Angelina's? Have you hitched a ride on their gravy train? Or are you so grateful for the job they got you in under a month that you can't help singing paeans to the gods of employment? Is that it?
ANGELINA'SCAFE IS A RACIST AND A PASSPORTIST OUTFIT.
Forgive me, but I'll simmer down for now! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
frigginhippie
Joined: 13 Mar 2004 Posts: 188 Location: over here
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ask 5 questions not meant antagonistically, get zero responses and an attack on personal character. Receive a grossly contorted misrepresentation of your thoughts to boot. Writpetition, you may have a way with words, but not with my words. I meant exactly what I wrote, nothing more. I said it politely and inquisitively. I asked to try and see your experience through the recruiter's eyes. To make a neutral judgement of the situation.
I have read your countless vilifications of racism. I know how you feel. Most of us have been unjustifiably insulted, refused, condemned, cursed at, spit upon and attacked for skin color. Discrimination thrives in every society - both human and animal - on the planet. You say "face the facts" and I am. In one of the "big 5" native English countries, a Chinese teacher is desired to be Chinese, not Japanese or Dutch, though fluent they may be. I'd expect "whitey" to struggle for that position. It is not the recruiter's preference, it's the market. So please read my words carefully before vehemently replying.
Quote: |
My words: They are meeting the demands of the students, or better, the students' parents, who put a (groundless) premium on a light exterior. This is the current state of the ESL market in most countries
Your words: So, are you suggesting that all Chinese are racists? And, passportists? ...And, does that in some way imply that you subscribe to these ideas? |
Parents in "most countries" do not equal "all Chinese". You directly insult me as an individual when you misrepresent my statements. I did not use the word "all" to describe a culture, society or nation. That's absurd. My comment was on the market demand, not the national character. Again, please try to understand my words before attacking.
writpetition wrote: |
If an application is rejected once, you're right. If a second and a thrid and a fourth and a fifth...and...rejected...year after year...what do you expect one to believe? |
I would expect one have caught the hint after the 2nd or 3rd time and directed efforts elsewhere, maximizing success and minimizing frustration. One thing I noticed about FTs I met through Angelina's: they are extremely pleasant, rational, calm and understanding. Some more or less qualified to teach than others, but all enjoyable personalities. None of us ever attacked another for a question or comment.
writpetition wrote: |
you went to them yourself...so do you then acknowledge that you're at the bottom of the heap? |
Please do not confuse lack of experience in China or EFL with lack of experience. August will mark my 8th year teaching, and I am young. I have taught ages 6 to 60, elementary to post-graduate students in several countries, three languages, all natural sciences, mathematics and music theory. One year ago my mastery of "ni hao" was not enough to roam the streets of China in search of employment, so I went to a recruiter for help. This year I no longer find one necessary. To answer your question, I would put myself at the top of the heap, should I be allowed to do the heaping. Alongside me would be calm, collected individuals who choose to accept others' thoughts and words without immediately taking irrational offense. These are the people best adapted to communicate. By saying this I do not mean to attack you personally, but to point out that there are more welcome ways to confront a situation. Your numerous posts on passportism - calm, sarcastic or aggressive - and continued disgust at the situation you place yourself in lead me to 3 conclusions: you will attempt to rationally change employers' and recruiters' perspectives (not through satirical poems or letters), OR you will seek a more welcome work environment, OR you will continue to live in a state of aggravation and complaint. I recommend the first two.
writpetition wrote: |
In fact, all of Angelina's posts clearly mention passport requirements. So, what is that supposed to mean? That they are not passportists? |
All jobs for foreign citizens require passports. This is law. All passports should be checked before beginning contract negotiations. This is sound business practice. However, schools often do say, "Recruiter, find me someone from [insert countries here]" Don't kill the messenger for doing his job.
writpetition wrote: |
So, are you also their spokesperson? Why have you taken on the role of an apologist for Angelina's? Have you hitched a ride on their gravy train? Or are you so grateful for the job they got you in under a month that you can't help singing paeans to the gods of employment? Is that it? |
No. haven't. no. no. no. My "I'm sorry" was to those of you who have been waiting without a response. That should be obvious. I do not represent anyone but myself. But I would like to refer you to the OP: "what experience did you have with angelina's recruitment co.?" If you will take note, I was actually answering the original question with as little bias as possible.
Perhaps you do not see things my way. That's fine. Perhaps you want to attack my words. That's fine. But do not alter my words to suit your conceptions, then turn them against me. All I did was share my experience, and offer the viewpoint of voiceless recruiters who are persistently assaulted by disgruntled applicants. Recruiter discrimination is the same unwarranted crime as employee discrimination. Hate breeds hate.
-FH |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
writpetition
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 213
|
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frigginhippie,
Without going in for a tit-for-tat and an endless debate, let me get straight to the point and to the core of the issue:
Do you want those who have been discriminated against to shut up, turn away and leave the field? Is that, in brief, your prescription?
Of course, you may choose to answer with a 'yes' or a 'no' or you may indulge a lot of polemics to skirt the issue. That is your choice.
As far as I am concerned, I will raise my voice against racism and passportism whenever I am confronted.
And BTW, when I say that Angelina's cafe asks for a passport, please don't be so naive as to interpret it as being in possession of a passport. Even a school-going kid with little or no international experience knows that passports are required to go from one country to another (with exceptions, of course). Reference to Angelina's, when I said, "Angelina's posts clearly mention passport requirements" implied that they required passports from the big 5 countries. Should I also tell you what those countries are or have you finally got the picture? YES, ANGELINA'SCAFE REQUIRES ALL APPLICANTS TO BE FROM THE UK/CANADA/AUSTRALIA/US/NZ. Applications from nationals of other countries are liable to summary rejection.
THIS IS DISCRIMINATION, plain and simple! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|