View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
geaaronson
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 948 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: English pronunciation |
|
|
I have been sometimes faulted by not emphasizing pronunciation in my classes as much as I should and so I have been making more of an effort to incorporate it.
I often have my students read out loud short essays and works of fiction and accordingly correct their pronunciation. I have also developed a short list of difficult words to pronounce ie. invulnerable, ad valorem tax, invincibility, etc. for my most advanced students. I also have a two page list of words whose spellings would indicate pronunciation other than first surmised. But somehow, I still have the feeling that I could do more. Has anyone compiled a list of difficult to pronounce words or seen such a list on the web? Dave`s ESL has only an advertisement for some audiotape when you click on pronunciation lessons from its menu. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gypsygirl1475
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 78
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:46 pm Post subject: Re: English pronunciation |
|
|
geaaronson wrote: |
I have been sometimes faulted by not emphasizing pronunciation in my classes as much as I should and so I have been making more of an effort to incorporate it.
I often have my students read out loud short essays and works of fiction and accordingly correct their pronunciation. |
I'm not an expert on teaching pronunciation, but I do feel sure that reading aloud is not an effective method. It's a difficult skill that requires attention paid to meaning as well as phonetics. Think of how few people can read a speech well in their native tongue and not put their audience to sleep! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you have internet access in your classroom, one way I've found that is effective for both vocab and pronunciation is to access short (4 minutes +/-) news clips on interesting topics. For example, cbc.ca has archived video and audio clips of news on a variety of topics. I've used things like 'extreme weather.'
It's useful to play the clips multiple times, for analysis first of meaning, then new words, then pronunciation.
One advantage of internet-based resources is the fact that language used is contextualized, real-life, and contemporary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:27 am Post subject: Re: English pronunciation |
|
|
MO39 wrote: |
geaaronson wrote: |
I have been sometimes faulted by not emphasizing pronunciation in my classes as much as I should and so I have been making more of an effort to incorporate it.
I often have my students read out loud short essays and works of fiction and accordingly correct their pronunciation. |
I'm not an expert on teaching pronunciation, but I do feel sure that reading aloud is not an effective method. It's a difficult skill that requires attention paid to meaning as well as phonetics. Think of how few people can read a speech well in their native tongue and not put their audience to sleep! |
I agree. There is an activity when working on short pieces, called back-chaining, that we work on i the TEFL course with students. Have had considerable success using this method, but it works on intonation and word stress, rather than single words, though it can be used at the word level.
Quote: |
�Back chain� - repeat sections of a sentence beginning with the last word or phrase and building it up to the complete sentence. |
http://www.eastsideliteracy.org/tutorsupport/ESL/ESLTips.htm
Quote: |
What the heck is Back-chaining and how do I use it in the classroom?
While pronunciation is not the sole focus of any ESL class, it is a factor of all foreign language classes that cannot be ignored. All students of a foreign language want to learn the proper way to pronounce words so that they can be better understood by native speakers. One tool you can use to teach it is called back-chaining. Back-chaining is a technique in which you start with the last word of a sentence and go backwards, repeating the previous words as you introduce each new word until you form the entire sentence. Won�t this confuse students? No! In fact, cognitive theory shows that students tend to forget what is coming at the end of a sentence. By starting at the end of the sentence and working back you are giving students more repetition of the last couple of words � the same words they tend to forget. Through this repetition the students have the pronunciation of the words reinforced multiple times. For example:
Original sentence: I need to pick up my prescription at the pharmacy.
Back-chaining sentence: Pharmacy. The pharmacy. At the pharmacy. Prescription at the pharmacy. My prescription at the pharmacy. Pick up my prescription at the pharmacy. I need to pick up my prescription at the pharmacy.
Don�t be afraid to correct pronunciation along the way! If students are having problems with the word �prescription� repeat only the word that�s causing problems.
Back-chaining can also be done with single words, such as �communicating.� By breaking the word into syllables, you can point out common sounds like the �-ing� sound.
|
http://www.ccda.net/E-nunciation/E-nunciation/enewsmarch2007.html
Quote: |
Chaining is a technique used to improve a student's pronunciation and fluency when chorusing a sentence or phrase. Rather than having the student repeat the entire group of words, you break them down into individual parts and progressively build them into the full structure, like adding links in a chain. Its recommended to start at the end of the sentence and work your way backward so when you reach the beginning the student has confidence with the following words. |
http://forums.eslcafe.com/job/viewtopic.php?t=37596 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for reminding of that technique, Guy. Though I didn't know it was called "back-chaining", I used it a lot when teaching lower-level groups back at the Community College of Philadelphia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chola

Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Posts: 92 Location: the great white north
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: pronunciation |
|
|
Lax/tight vowels affect pronunciation, eg. bitch/beach, shit/sheet, etc. Also, many Spanish speakers have difficulty with t/th, linking of consonants, the b/v distinction. Stress timing is important as well. I use to use a game from the book "pronunciation games" called "Da-da" language (I think?) that required the students to mark works for the stress /syllables....it was good at making them aware that English pronunciation is reliant on stress and how it effects intonation. Also, the pronunciation between words that are both vowels/nouns, eg. Photograph/photography/photographer....etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geaaronson
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 948 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: back chaining |
|
|
It seems back-chaining eliminates any potential confusion between phonetics and meaning by decontextualizing the grammatical unit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: back chaining |
|
|
geaaronson wrote: |
It seems back-chaining eliminates any potential confusion between phonetics and meaning by decontextualizing the grammatical unit. |
I never got a TEFL certificate, so I have no idea what you're talking about! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geaaronson
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 948 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: jabberwockey |
|
|
They don`t cover that in the TEFL, MO.
Simply stated-by reversing the sentence, students don`t pay attention to its meaning! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's a good point - why didn't you say it like that in the first place? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
They don`t cover that in the TEFL, MO.
Simply stated-by reversing the sentence, students don`t pay attention to its meaning! |
Not necessarily, on both counts. We cover it, and if you backchain 'chunks' of sentences, you can focus nicely on prepositional phrases, introductory phrases, and adverbials, among others, rather than single words.
Here's one I like to start with in low level classes.
The rain
in Spain
falls mainly
in the plains
Backchained as I wrote it, rather than single words. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geaaronson
Joined: 19 Apr 2005 Posts: 948 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:52 pm Post subject: decontextualizing |
|
|
No, Guy, I was referring to Marsha`s statement that she had never taken a TEFL class and did not know what I meant about �decontextualizing the grammatical unit�. I responded to that comment by saying that expression was one would not learn in a EFL/TEFL course.
I was not referring at all to backchaining being part of any teacher training course. But yes, it is good that you do teach it which is another reason why your program is a good one. Now, I`m tooting your horn. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well thank you...a scholar and a gentleman.
But I understood what you meant, and was referring to both the activity and the concept, trying to show how you can work both ends at the word level and at the grammar level.
Let me ask you though, going back to your first post. How do you find those business English students and their attitude towards pronunciation in general? I haven't taught such a class in a little while now, but always found that the suit and tie types worried more about pronunciation than anything else.
Last edited by Guy Courchesne on Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guy Courchesne wrote: |
but alway found that the suit and tie types worried more about pronunciation than anything else. |
And they should. Studies have shown that the average joe/jane native speaker, rates a non native speakers ability almost entirely on pronunciation. Their speach can be littered with minor grammar errors and not have a very wide vocabulary, but if thier pronunciation is good they will be rated higher than speakers who have perfect grammar and a very extensive vocabulary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|