View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Aristotle

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1388 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:59 am Post subject: Taiwanese Lawmaker Convicted of Raping Non Chinese |
|
|
Taiwanese Lawmaker Convicted of Raping Non Chinese
The vice presidential canidate was found guilty by the Taiwan supreme court of raping a non Chinese employee while in office.
Taiwan has been the bastion of government sponsored racism and persecution of non Chinese on Taiwan since the Chinese occupational government took possession of Taiwan shortly after World War Two.
This incident is not just a result of Taiwan's ongoing campaign to subjugate and persecute non Chinese on Taiwan. It is also clear evidence of the blatant and continuing abuse of non Chinese people's human rights on Taiwan. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Taylor
Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 384 Location: Texas/Taiwan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aristotle,
The man was convicted. That is the point of the story, right?
Why do you dwell on "racism and persecution of non-Chinese" ???
MOD EDIT
Taylor
Kaohsiung |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
junkmail
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rape is a horrific, violent crime but not isolated to Taiwan. I don't see how this is 'evidence' of racism. The guy was found guilty, so surely this is evidence that the victim was treated with the same dignity under the law as a Chinese should expect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aristotle

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1388 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
How would you explain the fact that the victim in this case was deported after filing a complaint about the sexual assault to the police. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
junkmail
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Posts: 377
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
It doesn't say she was deported in the article you linked to. Her job finished (obviously) as she was the perpertrator's maid and she returned to the Philippines; according to the article.
It does imply she was sort of bought off. I doubt she could have afforded to stay anyway. My point is that it would have been easy to brush this under the carpet but the Taiwanese legal system persued the case despite the poor circumstances of the victim. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aristotle

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1388 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
So you believe that this woman continued to finish out her contract living and working in the same residence with the person who had just raped her?
She was fired an deported as is standard procedure with all non Chinese workers on Taiwan when they file a complaint of any kind.
A. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with junkmail. The article doesn't state, nor does it suggest, that the woman was deported. As usual Aristotle you are trying to make more out of this than it is.
Aristotle wrote: |
So you believe that this woman continued to finish out her contract living and working in the same residence with the person who had just raped her? |
Obviously not. She no doubt left Taiwan soon after the incident, and from the newspaper it seems that she took a tidy sum of money with her from her employer. Assuming that she was earning NTD15,000 a month which is the standard wage for domestics, her payout was enough to pay out her entire contract. Not a windfall considering the circumstances, but certainly there is nothing to complain about when you consider employment issues and the government. Just a problem with one sicko employer.
You read the same article Aristotle and you are trying to suggest that she was deported because she was raped and was non-Chinese. The article does not suuport this.
Aristotle wrote: |
She was fired an deported as is standard procedure with all non Chinese workers on Taiwan when they file a complaint of any kind. |
That is not what the article says. You are adding your own bias.
She was released from her contract AND paid the entire contract salary in one payment. She was then allowed to return home, which I am sure is what she wanted to do under the circumstances. I am sure that she wanted to be with her family. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|