Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Primarily for Canadians but not limited to...
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Yawarakaijin



Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 504
Location: Middle of Nagano

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:33 am    Post subject: Primarily for Canadians but not limited to... Reply with quote

The time is fast approaching. How concered are you that Harper is going to win the election? From everything I have been reading it seems like a real possibility. If there are any Americans or Europeans out there who have any opinions I would love to hear your two cent on the possible shift as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuck



Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 1921
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All the problems started with Trudeau and Chretian as the finance minister. Let's spent, spent, spent irresponsibly and tired to keep Eastern Canada happy. The Torries tried to clean up the mess, were marginally successful, and then the Liberals continued on...scandals after scandals, representing Eastern Canada once again.

Hopefully Harper comes in and brings some political accountabilty to the government. Hopefully the back scratching and back door deals stop. There's a reason why, it's finally time to topple the current government.

I'm not concerned about Harper winning the election.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On economics, I think the Liberals have done a great job. Scandals will bring you down though, even if some of the shenanigans are normal party politics, whatever colour you wear.

I'm more concerned about a Conservative government's actions in international affairs, such as Iraq and the war on terror. I liked that Chretch and Martin held to the UN line. That's the best place to be for Canada and in sync with most of the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Hoser



Joined: 19 Mar 2005
Posts: 694
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like the Conservatives are in. I don't see what's stopping the Liberals and NDP from forming a coalition government though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Synne



Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 269
Location: Tohoku

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This whole "every man for himself" policy the Conservatives are bringing in is going to have its downfalls.

Either way this is going to be interesting to see what they can do.

I did not mind the Liberals.

12 years can't be wrong.

Canada was and will hopefully remain the absolute brilliant country it is.

I personally voted NDP.


Last edited by Synne on Wed Jan 25, 2006 5:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting results...no major changes. The West voted the same, and conservatives picked up only just enough in Ontario and the Maritimes to make a minority. It's like, people are tired of Liberal scandal but scared of Harper. The Conservatives won't be able to push a social agenda, so what's left? Longer prison terms? That's it? Watch the Liberals regroup quickly with some fresh faces and force a vote again later this year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
seanmcginty



Joined: 27 Sep 2005
Posts: 203

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canuck wrote:
All the problems started with Trudeau and Chretian as the finance minister. Let's spent, spent, spent irresponsibly and tired to keep Eastern Canada happy. The Torries tried to clean up the mess, were marginally successful, and then the Liberals continued on...scandals after scandals, representing Eastern Canada once again.

Hopefully Harper comes in and brings some political accountabilty to the government. Hopefully the back scratching and back door deals stop. There's a reason why, it's finally time to topple the current government.

I'm not concerned about Harper winning the election.


The Tories tried to clean up the mess? Back scratching and back door deals stop? Two words: BRIAN MULROONEY.

I voted Liberal. I'm glad to see that Harper didn't do too well. The whole "vote for us because the Liberals are corrupt" message didn't really ring too well with me. For one thing, the Conservative platforms are just totally the opposite of what I want for my country. For another, most of the corrupt Liberals they are talking about jumped ship when Martin took over and actually campaigned strongly for the Conservatives in Quebec. Then there is the fact that back-scratching happens with every government. Happened with Trudeau, Mulrooney, Chretien...and you can bet we'll be seeing it with Harper if he's around long enough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuck



Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 1921
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="seanmcginty"]
canuck wrote:

The Tories tried to clean up the mess? Back scratching and back door deals stop? Two words: BRIAN MULROONEY.


Please do a little reading about Canadian history. Trudeau and Chretien crippled the country economically with the spend, spend, spend attitude instead of some sort of fiscal responsibility.

Here's a quick google search:
http://www.dialogue.ca/APRIL-MAY%2004%2017.6/revolution_from_above.htm

Quote:
When Trudeau took office, after two world wars and the Great Depression, Canada's federal debt was about $20 billion. When he quit in 1984, it was ten times that. The Department of Finance reported that, �By 1984-5, the debt was $206 billion and growing at an annual rate of almost 25 percent.� Although the successor Mulroney government cut the growth of annual program spending from 13.8 percent to 3.7 percent, by 1991 an average prime interest rate of 10.5 percent had compounded the Trudeau debt to $400 billion.

In short, the deficits that Jean Chr�tien and Paul Martin claim credit for reducing were created in the first place by one of their own, namely Pierre Elliott Trudeau. All they did was to cut services, cut the military, and download expenses to the provinces, which downloaded them, in turn, to municipalities.


Wait, that's what I said,

canuck wrote:
All the problems started with Trudeau and Chretien as the finance minister. Let's spent, spent, spent irresponsibly and tired to keep Eastern Canada happy. The Torries tried to clean up the mess, were marginally successful, and then the Liberals continued on...scandals after scandals, representing Eastern Canada once again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
angrysoba



Joined: 20 Jan 2006
Posts: 446
Location: Kansai, Japan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:04 am    Post subject: Repeat after me 'e-LE-ction' Reply with quote

Any thoughts on Michael Ignatieff's victory in Toronto?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cshannon



Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I figure the current election result won't change much of anything. If Harper's minority gov't had substantially more power than it now does, it would be bad for most Canadians. Fortunately it does not, so it'll be right back to compromising, and I think the rest of Parliament won't accept any right wing BS. Many Conservative policies are too outrageous, some even on par with the Bush administration across the border.

The Liberals weren't bad, and Paul Martin could have been good PM for years to come had it not been for such an unfortunate campaign and getting bogged down in all these petty scandals.
I personally didn't care much about these little corruption scandals because they're basically unavoidable in any gov't (and despite all the rhetoric, Harper won't change a damn thing in that regard and I could see the Conservatives being even worse, again if they had substantially more power). Plus the scandals that did happen were relatively inconsequential, especially in light of how well the economy has been doing. Not saying corruption in any form is good, but it could be a lot worse.
Anyway, say whatever you want but the Canadian economy has been doing quite well under the Liberals. Period. People just forget that when they zero in on the petty scandals.

Hopefully the Libs have learned their lesson and we'll see them back in shortly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
canuck



Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 1921
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cshannon wrote:
I figure the current election result won't change much of anything. If Harper's minority gov't had substantially more power than it now does, it would be bad for most Canadians. Fortunately it does not, so it'll be right back to compromising, and I think the rest of Parliament won't accept any right wing BS. Many Conservative policies are too outrageous, some even on par with the Bush administration across the border.

The Liberals weren't bad, and Paul Martin could have been good PM for years to come had it not been for such an unfortunate campaign and getting bogged down in all these petty scandals.
I personally didn't care much about these little corruption scandals because they're basically unavoidable in any gov't (and despite all the rhetoric, Harper won't change a damn thing in that regard and I could see the Conservatives being even worse, again if they had substantially more power). Plus the scandals that did happen were relatively inconsequential, especially in light of how well the economy has been doing. Not saying corruption in any form is good, but it could be a lot worse.
Anyway, say whatever you want but the Canadian economy has been doing quite well under the Liberals. Period. People just forget that when they zero in on the petty scandals.

Hopefully the Libs have learned their lesson and we'll see them back in shortly.


I totally disasgree with most of what you've said. Unfortunately it is a minority government, which basically lends itself to banter back and forth, not really accomplishing as much as a majority government could.

The scandals come from the former Liberal government, Chretien and others, who wasted so many tax payers dollars. I don't know how you can dismiss all that garbage so easily. It's not like it was once, twice, three times, four times, five times...it's throughout their whole term. Fortunately enough for him, he's "folksy" enough to ride it out, untouched and let his boy Paul take the fall.

It's really hard to give credit to the Liberals for a good economy in Canada right now, but better to look at the economy doing well in spite of the Liberals. It's also a hard pill to swallow for most western Canadians, as they basically subsidize eastern Canada. The west coast economy is doing well, despite little federal representation until the call for help comes every four years at election time...unless it's even less than that because the country doesn't have confidence in the elected government.

Personally, I don't view the current government as a bunch of radicals, but a group that's actually looking to improve things and shake up things for the better, rather than hope.

Here's a classic example of the old federal government's mismanagement...to the tune of a billion dollars. Rolling Eyes It's hard to call this a little mistake.

http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&id=496

Quote:
The federal government claimed in parliament that it would cost no more than $85 million over 5 years to implement firearm registration. In 1995, Mauser predicted that the final cost for the registry would be between $1 billion and $1.5 billion. In 2002, the full cost of setting up the registration bureaucracy has already reached $1 billion.

�We don�t know how much this fiasco will eventually cost but if it is allowed to continue on the same path, the bill could easily reach $2 billion by 2005,� says Mauser.


I think this election was all about being accountable, something Liberals weren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cshannon



Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Canuck: that's fine, I can understand you are likely a staunch conservative, and I can respect that -- but since our political persuasions probably differ fundamentally, we may just respectfully have to leave it at that.

However, I would say that we both have our opinions, and saying the economy is doing well despite the liberals (bearing in mind how long they've been in power) is an opinion, which I don't fully agree with, but again I doubt either of us will persuade the other. I don't consider the Conservatives to be a radical government either, but some of their policies I find quite worrisome. I don't think I trust Harper and I do believe the Conservatives have a hidden right-wing agenda despite recent refutations to the contrary.

I was essentially happy with the way things were for the time being despite the scandals and I personally don't feel that the change was worth the risk. Did the Liberals deserve to get punished for abusing the public trust? Probably. Will the Conservatives be any different, if not worse? Probably not. But that's just my opinion. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
We both agree however that not much has changed in this election as a minority gov't is still just a minority gov't

BTW, I wouldn't cite the Frasier Institute too often to press your case on these issues as it is well known to be a right wing think-tank (and hence I would say biased) and I guess most left-minded people would not consider it authoritative (not speaking just for myself).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
canuck



Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 1921
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cshannon wrote:
BTW, I wouldn't cite the Frasier Institute too often to press your case on these issues as it is well known to be a right wing think-tank (and hence I would say biased) and I guess most left-minded people would not consider it authoritative (not speaking just for myself).


Maybe you would like something like Wikipedia....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_gun_registry
(hard to dispute the facts here)

Yes, we can agree to disagree. My main point though is that it was the Liberals that created the mess, and we still haven't recovered from it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Courchesne



Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 9650
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Repeat after me 'e-LE-ction' Reply with quote

angrysoba wrote:
Any thoughts on Michael Ignatieff's victory in Toronto?


That is an interesting story, no? Just found out about him last night. 30 years abroad was he, before coming home and now winning a seat? Maybe I'll try that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
chirp



Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 148

PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just another thought: Since Mr. Martin has decided not to lead the Liberals in a future election, what do you think the chances are that Conservatives will change leaders going into the next election? I mean really, Mr. Harper couldn't get a majority government (twice) even with all scandals and bad press plaguing the Liberals.

I agree wholeheartedly that change was needed but I could not be more opposed to Mr. Harper's personal views on a number of hot topics. That being said, I do not believe that all the members of the half Conservative-half Reform party share his opinion. We'll just have to see if he allows a free vote...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Japan All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China