View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jpvanderwerf2001
Joined: 02 Oct 2003 Posts: 1117 Location: New York
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:40 am Post subject: Pronunciation |
|
|
Hi all,
I'm giving a five-part seminar on pronunciation to non-native English teachers starting in a couple of weeks. Has anyone done such a thing before? If so, what resources did you use (online or books)? How would you go about it?
I taught pronunciation (ie, accent training) for a year in India and have a pretty good idea, but I'm always open to new insight!
Thanks in advance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm. I'm not sure whether you're looking for something specific to teaching non-native teachers or just students in general.
Here's one exercise I've found highly effective. Find some interesting topics to write dialogues about. Break the students into pairs or small groups and have them write up the dialogues. They should then perform the dialogues in front of the class as you record their voices on tape.
Collect up the dialogues and find another native English speaker to help you make a second recording of the dialogues on a different tape.
Return to the class and give the students back their dialogues. Next, play their original recording, followed back-to-back by the native speaker recording on the second cassette. Ask the students to tell you what's different in the two pronunciations.
By about the third dialogue, the students start noticing the errors in pronunciation before I play back the native speaker recording. I've found this to be extremely useful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Useful books for any teacher re: pron.
'Teaching English Pronunciation' Kenworthy. longman ISBN 0-582- 74621-3
'speaking Clearly' Rogerson & Gilbert. CUP ISBN 0-521- 31287-6
and for teacher trainers Part 2 module 4 of 'A course in Language teaching' Ur. part of the cambridge teacher training and development series. Sorry I don't have the ISBN ( i only have a photocopy ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My two best "quick fixes" for pronunciation are: Word stress, and sentence stress.
Teach how to identify "meaning words" in sentences, then may students EMPHASIZE them. (I do it with hand gestures.) This does wonders for accent, particularly in the way it causes weak forms to become, well, weak. Just like native speakers. It also helps with development of a more natural rythm.
Word stress is harder, but identifying stressed sylables can be done through listening. Sylable counting can be a help here, especially with words that non-natives tend to put an unnatural number of sylables in. (Unfortunately, comfortable, vegetable, and any other word that seems to have more sylables than it really does.)
A close second favourite for me to teach is "ed" endings in the regular past simple. I like to get them jumping back and forth between different classroom areas that correspond to different "ed" sounds.
Have fun.
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kent F. Kruhoeffer

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2129 Location: 中国
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
valley_girl

Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 272 Location: Somewhere in Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are lots of online resources and software available that can be useful tools in teaching pronunciation. I've used Pronunciation Power in CALL classes in the past and the students found it to be a useful aid for them.
Other than studying the basic 'rules' of pronunciation, I find that my students generally need additional help with their endings (-s, -ed) and to that end, they benefit from learning to understand the difference between voiced and voiceless sounds. However, I tend to focus more on intonation because this seems to make the biggest difference in their pronunciation overall. I spend a lot of time on syllables and syllable stress, sentence stress (and how it changes meaning), and question stress (yes/no, wh-, tag).
Pronunciation isn't my favourite skill to teach, so I don't envy you the task.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
voiced and voiceless sounds |
I would talk about voiced and unvoiced. Is this a UK/NA thing again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jr1965
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd spend most of the time on the so-called suprasegmentals (intonation, linking/reduced speech, sentence and word-level stress, and then even things like how we parse groups of words into chunks when we speak: for example, in the U.S. I always said my phone number 555 [pause] 5555. Here in Spain, when I say my cell # it's 55 [pause] 555 [pause] 55 [pause] 55. This was hard for me to say (and especially understand!) at first. It's not that I don't know the numbers; it's that when I first heard phone numbers said this way, it threw me and I had to ask the person to repeat the number (see the 1st book below; if I remember correctly, there's an activity that deals with exactly this kind of thing).
You say you're teaching a 5-part seminar. I'm not sure how long each session is, but you could almost focus on each one of the above items: introduce it, get people to think about how it's used (or not) in their native language, explain and get participants to notice usage in English by presenting examples in a context, focus on activities that teachers can use to get their learners practicing with the lang. Remember to include listening as well as speaking practice with whatever the focus is.
Good books: "Clear Speech" and "Clear Speech from the Start"
Author: Judy Gilbert |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do remember to place practice on the differences between your students L1s and English, presuming they all have the same L1.
And bear in mind that they may well know theoretically the individual phonetic differences, but fail to understand, stress, intonation both within the word and within the sentence.
Incidentally back-chaining makes it easier to keep the stress and intonation of the whole sentence than front-chaining. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pollux
Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Posts: 224 Location: PL
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dmb,
Quote: |
Quote:
voiced and voiceless sounds
I would talk about voiced and unvoiced. Is this a UK/NA thing again? |
It must be. My Betty Azar's grammar book( American version of Murphy's) calls it 'voiced' and 'voiceless'.
A good pronunciation book that I can recommend is Judy Gilbert's "Clear Speech." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
valley_girl

Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 272 Location: Somewhere in Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voiced and voiceless vs. voiced and unvoiced
-and-
countable and uncountable vs. count and non-count
-and-
past, present, and future progressive vs. past, present, and future continuous
Don't you just wish we could have one standard term for everything we teach? We confuse not only our students, but ourselves as well.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JUst to confuse things more instead of voiced and unvoiced I still use the terms surd and sonant. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Incidentally back-chaining makes it easier to keep the stress and intonation of the whole sentence than front-chaining. |
Clapclapclap! Very true. This is equally true for sylable stress in individual words.
Quote: |
instead of voiced and unvoiced I still use the terms surd and sonant. |
Fine with me, as long as you teach the terms to the students. With lower level, I frequently talk about "sounds that vibrate" and "sounds that don't vibrate." A bit cumbersome in speech, but nicely clear in terms of meaning.
How do you all teach students to recognise the difference?
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Fine with me, as long as you teach the terms to the students. |
I meant for private use.
I don't bother to teach any term to students; just stick the finger on the larynx. Maybe with advanced students I'd use voiced and unvoiced. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Henry_Cowell

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 3352 Location: Berkeley
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: Re: Pronunciation |
|
|
jpvanderwerf2001 wrote: |
I'm giving a five-part seminar on pronunciation to non-native English teachers starting in a couple of weeks. Has anyone done such a thing before? |
Um, usually if you're invited to give a seminar to a designated group, you know something about that group. Who are the teachers? What have they taught? How do they teach English pronunciation? Where did they study?
In other words, have you done a needs assessment? Did whoever invited you to give the seminar do a needs assessment or even tell you what you should do?
Sounds like the blind leading the blind, especially if you yourself don't know enough about pronunciation to have (or know where to obtain) your own materials for five sessions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|