View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
guruengerish

Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 424 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:46 am Post subject: Further discrimination by English First |
|
|
Today, an advertisement appeared in Dave's pages, wanting a teacher at EF, between the ages of 22 and 30.
My letter to the school is below.
+++++++++++++
EF English First Cempaka Mas, Jakarta
Sir,
I am amazed that unlike most western countries, you advertise a position for an English teacher, specifying specific ages.
Apart from being discriminatory, do you really think that a teacher is 'past it' once he or she passes the age of 30?
I am staggered that a reputable ESL site such as Dave's even allows you to publish such an advertisement.
Possibly you feel that your students can best be served by some young punk, rather than drawing on the experience of a more mature staff member.
In disgust,
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sidjameson
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 629 Location: osaka
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
You do realize that your last line where you automatically assume someone under thrity is a "young punk" is throwing out the same ageist negative stereotype that you are acusing the school of.
In England walk into any city centre fun pub and the staff are under thirty. Certain shops it's the same. Models its the same. It's just a fact of life I am afraid. Their perception of market demand. Right or wrong as it may be I prefer it this way than the pc correctness of back home.
The best way to fight it is to make sure that by the time youre over thirty you no longer need to consider such jobs anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wailing_imam
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 580 Location: Malaya
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frankly, who over thirty would want to work at EF anyway?
Sid is right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gugelhupf
Joined: 24 Jan 2004 Posts: 575 Location: Jabotabek
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah! You all missed the typo in the advert. The figures 22 and 30 refer to the required IQ test result and NOT the age stipulation. This range of ability applies to all jobs with said employer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Salam
Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 135 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
wailing_imam wrote: |
Frankly, who over thirty would want to work at EF anyway?
Sid is right. |
Some people over thirty are only just beginning their career in this field and EF is often a first step in that direction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gugelhupf
Joined: 24 Jan 2004 Posts: 575 Location: Jabotabek
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also note from their ad that:
"No working experiences are welcome to apply".
This is clear and blatant discrimination against working experiences, surely?
That sentence was written by their Academic Coordinator. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
papillon
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:48 am Post subject: E xceptionally F ickle |
|
|
I applied for a position with EF West Jakarta and was turned down for being
'the wrong shade of white'.
Now, where did I put my Kampung whitener..? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TEAM_PAPUA

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 1679 Location: HOLE
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:43 am Post subject: * |
|
|
Is it legal to employ 22 yr olds as teachers here? I thought there wa sa change in the KITAS requirements.
Anyway, I know of several middle aged teachers working for EF, so shopping around might be an idea. Alternatively, you could avoid living in sub-standard housing, being overworked and underpaid and being treated like **** and look for a teaching position elsewhere. At your age I'd opt for China over Indonesia, a nice cushy university position and all the rice you can eat I believe they still recruit teachers upto the age of 65 (but it's worth checking). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guruengerish

Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 424 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:52 am Post subject: younger teachers for EF |
|
|
Some good points there guys.
I'd missed that typo, and of course, it must be the IQ.
But seriously, I've worked for EF in West Jakarta, and they were very good. Sure, I'd love to have worked with 'Headway' or other professional material, but that's the way it went.
All of the teachers were above 30, and a couple of us over 50! heaven forbid!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
uilleannpiper
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 107
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:11 am Post subject: Re: younger teachers for EF |
|
|
guruengerish wrote: |
I'd love to have worked with 'Headway' or other professional material, |
You're joking right? Please tell me you're joking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guruengerish

Joined: 28 Mar 2004 Posts: 424 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:03 am Post subject: Headway |
|
|
No, I'm not joking.
The Headway series are most professional, as are the tapes that come with them.
The EF course is OK, but the books look rushed and the tapes are BAAD. Ever heard an American trying to do an imitation East London accent, or worse, a Welsh one?
So, I stand by my original thought - Headway books are well produced, their teacher notes very helpful and I like them.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TEAM_PAPUA

Joined: 24 May 2004 Posts: 1679 Location: HOLE
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: * |
|
|
Why not try Surabaya? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
uilleannpiper
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 107
|
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: Re: Headway |
|
|
guruengerish wrote: |
No, I'm not joking.
The Headway series are most professional, as are the tapes that come with them.
The EF course is OK, but the books look rushed and the tapes are BAAD. Ever heard an American trying to do an imitation East London accent, or worse, a Welsh one?
So, I stand by my original thought - Headway books are well produced, their teacher notes very helpful and I like them.  |
Yes, the EF books were baaaad, but I worked with Headway when I taught ESL here in Australia at two different colleges. They were glossy and colourful, but the content (unless things have changed since 1997) were, as most text books are, heavily contrived and being a British publication, very Eurocentric. My students hated it, they labelled it 'Headache' and I generally avoided it over more authentic, self-compiled materials. I feel very sorry for any student who was encouraged to simply 'work through' the chapters page by page. The lessons required being heavily supplemented almost to the point of leaving it out of the picture altogether. My personal opinion is text books are only good for structural teaching, eg, grammar practice books.
Last edited by uilleannpiper on Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:30 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
happy_me
Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 174 Location: In the neighborhood of nirvana
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok lets forget EF all the textbooks are the same just some have slightly more material that is usable. If you want to teach its better to have a colachon of 15 or more books and let me tell you the old ones that your teachers teacher used are very good cus there not trying to make the book self outdate 1 or2 years time.
Now back to the old point of, why do the schools still pay the same as 5 years ago?
Cus the teachers think its cheaper here?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
uilleannpiper
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Posts: 107
|
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
happy_me wrote: |
ok lets forget EF all the textbooks are the same just some have slightly more material that is usable. If you want to teach its better to have a colachon of 15 or more books and let me tell you the old ones that your teachers teacher used are very good cus there not trying to make the book self outdate 1 or2 years time.
|
...and because they also emphasised the teaching of punctuation and correct homonym usage ( editing mine). Come on people, at least type like you're English teachers. Context and speed are no excuse for tardiness. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|