View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sleigh
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:49 pm Post subject: More about Hess |
|
|
I went to Taiwan with my husband during the 2004/2005 school year. Our experience was much like �harrietthespy�s� (see My Year at Hess post) except we were not as lucky to get the airport pick-up that was promised. We too paid $600 plus CDN to have our health checks done when we could have paid $50 had we known we could have waited until we were in Taiwan to have them done. On top of that we dealt with promises of getting paid for doing extra work (parent nights, open houses) and then had to argue about the hours we worked every single pay period. All in all it was annoying and I would definitely NOT have worked for Hess had I known the headaches we had to deal with.
The very worst part about my experience with Hess came when I received devastating news from home six months into our contract. My father had been killed in a car accident. We left that day so we could attend the funeral and be with my family. This is the worst thing that has ever happened in my life and I find it hard to talk about or to share my story which is why it has taken me so long to write this post. Since my husband and I had left Taiwan to attend to this family emergency, they placed two new teachers in our school. I understand that the students needed teachers and something had to be done in our absence, but they fined us both NT 30 000 for breaking our contracts...even though they had given our jobs away and we had no jobs to go back to. In our contract it even said that teachers were permitted three weeks (unpaid of course) in case of an emergency. We left on a Wednesday and they had new teachers in place by the following Monday. We didn�t even get three days.
One foreign teacher sent condolences but other than that we never heard from our director (she would not return our calls or emails) or any of the other trainers that are so caring and accommodating during training and evaluations.
My experience in Taiwan (beyond Hess) was very good. Of course I wish I didn�t have to leave so suddenly, but I got to meet so many great people, experience stinky tofu and other interesting cuisine, climb several mountains and go to countless night markets�I hope to go back and visit someday. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jonks

Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1240
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank-you for your input. I would however recommend that your first post was not a biting criticism of a reputable language school.
There are many good things that can be said for Hess too.
They employ legally for a start.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sleigh
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I taught kindy full time and our kindergarten did get raided by government officials while I was teaching...very scary... I'm pretty sure teaching kindy as well as fining teachers (which the school I worked for also did) are both illegal in Taiwan.
Some Hess schools are better than others, although none of the teachers who were hired when I was enjoyed working for them. Obviously there are some teachers who do enjoy working for Hess, I was just not one of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ki
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 Posts: 475
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, HESS does has a reputation, a big reputation. It is not all good either, neither is it all bad. I would even say that it may be a good option for new teachers.
Legal is such a subjective word in Taiwan. I'm not sure how legal their kindergarten positions are. I don't know how legal their teachers are working at two or more different branches, which is just about compulsory when you work for HESS, with only the one branch on your ARC. I also don't know how legal, or moral, the deductions/penalties are for when you come late to work or leave your contract early.
However, these are not HESS specific things, with a posible exception to being forced to work at two or more schools. Could someone deny or confirm this for me?
Many foreigners here teach in kindergartens. I am told that this is only legal to do when you marry a Taiwanese local. Many foreigners also teach, subbing or part time, at schools not on their ARC. Many schools have a lot of varied deductions and penalty clauses. Some of these are fairly innocuous but others are downright immoral. Losing half a day's pay for being one minute late for work is not right but losing 10 NT for every minute you are late may be something you need to compromise on. Read the contract and refuse anything dodgy. They can easily change the contract though of course they hate to do so. I have friends that argue that the leaving work mid-contract penalty is illegal and you should take the school to the tribunal over that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jonks

Joined: 29 Jan 2006 Posts: 1240
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Point taken. They do get ARC's for their teachers though don't they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sleigh
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with you Ki, despite the negative experience I had. Hess is a good option of new teachers. I think new teachers need to know they likely will have to put up with some headaches if they do choose to work there.
As far as I know they do get ARC's for their teachers, at least they did for my husband and I when we worked for them (just over a year ago). Our ARC's said we worked for a Hess school that we never set foot in though so technically we were working illegally at the two schools we did actually teach at. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atiff
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the recent law changes (c. April 2006), Hess and all other schools can now add "secondary" branches to your ARCs. This allows NSTs to be registered at more than one branch legally.
Cheers
Andrew Tiffany |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wix
Joined: 21 Apr 2003 Posts: 250 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The NT$30,000 fine is not legal and entirely unreasonable. It raises big question marks about the business ethics of Hess. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
wix wrote: |
The NT$30,000 fine is not legal and entirely unreasonable. It raises big question marks about the business ethics of Hess. |
Assuming that things are just as the OP says then I agree that it was unreasonable of Hess to take these monies and I would encourage these individuals to contact Hess head office to discuss this matter. If these individuals were taking leave for the death of a family member then there is some leeway in the legislation for this. You would definitely win a case here.
If however the teachers left to go home without notice or resigned their positions based upon the need to go home then this would have complicated things.
It is however totally legal for Hess to levy a penalty for breach of contract if a teacher leaves the contract early. This should be stated in the contract of employment. Do not confuse this with the upfront deductions of deposits of bonds which are illegal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ki
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 Posts: 475
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's an NST? Is it a HESS specific TLA?
Ah, the ARC distinction between legal/illegal. It does make life easier with an ARC, getting a SIM card, bank account, avoiding visa runs, trips to the police station and the like. My previous post was merely making a point. In practice I am less concerned about "being legal"
Atif, I know that you are allowed to add extra schools to your ARC but do people actually do this?
I think that clauses like the $30 000 penalty clause is morally wrong but of course large insecure corporations need to keep their workers in check. In their shoes, however, I can see why they would need to employ these safe-guards. Us foreigners are not known for being reliable and a couple bad eggs can destroy an entire nation's image.
I can also see why they would take advantage of your misfortune. But again, not HESS specific. These are just some of the things you need to decide if you want to compromise on. My current job has a $6,000 penalty clause, double if I don't give one month's advance notice. But it is just one of those things I had to compromise on to secure what I consider a great job. I wouldn't have agreed to $30,000 though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kuberkat
Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 358 Location: Oman
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sleigh, this is a spine-chilling experience and your writing about it is a very important contribution to this forum. The penalty against you was entirely unreasonable and the school is definitely at fault here. However, it would seem to have been the decision of a few people, and many others in the organization would strongly disagree with it.
Ki wrote, very sensibly:
Quote: |
However, these are not HESS specific things, with a possible exception to being forced to work at two or more schools. Could someone deny or confirm this for me?
|
I do think this is the bottom line. While I insist that most of the complaints about Hess could be even more easily raised against any other school (or working life in general, actually) it still could have happened at another place. This is a nightmare story, but I do still believe that for any newcomer to ELT who has no existing support network in Taiwan, Hess is still a strong bet. And I say this after having cursed the yellow hippo many a time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harrietthespy
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
atiff wrote: |
With the recent law changes (c. April 2006), Hess and all other schools can now add "secondary" branches to your ARCs. This allows NSTs to be registered at more than one branch legally.
|
Andrew, come on now. You can't legally work at an illegal job. I asked several friends at Hess and not one of them has their kindy branch on their ARC. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atiff
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
clark.w.griswald wrote: |
It is however totally legal for Hess to levy a penalty for breach of contract if a teacher leaves the contract early. This should be stated in the contract of employment. Do not confuse this with the upfront deductions of deposits of bonds which are illegal. |
This is, in fact, the case. The clause is stated on the contract in both English and Chinese, and the Hess contract also refers to the NST (Native Speaking Teacher) Policy Handbook, with contains all the relevant clauses of this nature. It is part of the requirement of signing a contract at Hess that an applicant has read this policy book (available in Hess' online acceptance package) and agrees to abide by it.
Last edited by atiff on Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atiff
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ki wrote: |
Atif, I know that you are allowed to add extra schools to your ARC but do people actually do this?
|
Yes, Hess has more and more teachers going onto multiple-branch ARCs.
As I said, with the law change it has become much easier to do this. In the past is was quite difficult.
Last edited by atiff on Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atiff
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
harrietthespy wrote: |
atiff wrote: |
With the recent law changes (c. April 2006), Hess and all other schools can now add "secondary" branches to your ARCs. This allows NSTs to be registered at more than one branch legally.
|
Andrew, come on now. You can't legally work at an illegal job. I asked several friends at Hess and not one of them has their kindy branch on their ARC. |
I didn't say that. I said that Hess and other schools can now add more branches to your ARC, so that you can work at more than one branch legally. The situation with foreign teachers teaching at a Kindergarten remains unchanged, as that law remains unchanged. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|