View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MrCAPiTUL
Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 232 Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:11 pm Post subject: *Off Topic* Nanjing |
|
|
Anybody know of any good movies about what happened in Nanjing during the late 30s? Thanks in advance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:02 am Post subject: Re: *Off Topic* Nanjing |
|
|
MrCAPiTUL wrote: |
Anybody know of any good movies about what happened in Nanjing during the late 30s? Thanks in advance. |
Im sure the Chinese have got that one covered. historically accurate movies on pillaging, mass-rape. murder and massacre of civilians I dont think would do well here. Just like American-made movies on the bombing of Hiroshima and the 731 chemical labs. I did see a good movie a few years ago about the Japanese soldiers in Papua New Guinea where they were beheading Australian soldiers.
The book by Iris Chang on Nanjing I think is supposed to be excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markle
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 1316 Location: Out of Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For a fairly accurate view of how the Chinese (government)portrays Japanese atrociaties (sp?) Try "Red Sourgham" directed by Zhang Yimou. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cornishmuppet
Joined: 27 Mar 2004 Posts: 642 Location: Nagano, Japan
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've read the book Paul mentions on Nanking. Its fascinating, but really harrowing stuff. Kind of makes you look a little differently at things knowing what this country used to be capable of. My girlfriend denied it ever happened, though, which kind of reflects the quality of Japanese history lessons at school.
Is Pearl Harbour any good? Saw it on ex-rental in the video shop the other day and was going to buy it to watch it with a Japanese friend, before changing my mind and buying Independence Day instead. Saying that, I was more put off by the thought of 3 hours of Ben Afleck's jutting chin than of encouraging any awkward conversation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
cornishmuppet wrote: |
Is Pearl Harbour any good? Saw it on ex-rental in the video shop the other day and was going to buy it to watch it with a Japanese friend, before changing my mind and buying Independence Day instead. Saying that, I was more put off by the thought of 3 hours of Ben Afleck's jutting chin than of encouraging any awkward conversation. |
Special effects are good but its an extremely corny and cliched screenplay. A love story wrapped around the events of July 7th, 1941. Two guys fighting over one rather plastic girl (Kate Beckinsale) while Pearl harbor gets walloped. If you can ignore the dialog its probably not bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MrCAPiTUL
Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 232 Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the input.
And yeah, Pearl Harbor wasn't really that great. Band of Brothers KICKED A$$, though! If any of you haven't seen it, check it out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cornishmuppet
Joined: 27 Mar 2004 Posts: 642 Location: Nagano, Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, Pearl Harbour does sound lame. Have you ever seen Van Helsing, where Beckinsale runs around a forest fighting all manner of evil creatures (while wearing high heels) then falls over a log or something at the end and just dies? That was completely lame. Her plus Affleck is just George Clooney short of being the movie I'd rather eat an old shoe filled with natto than watch. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ndorfn

Joined: 15 Mar 2005 Posts: 126
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
read the book by iris change and the rebuttal from a couple of japanese professors.
hard to tell who to believe cause they both make some pretty iffy statements based on less than convincing data. still, reading both makes you realise how easy it is to convince people of an argument if they only get one side.
i think it was in "Embracing Defeat" that I remember reading how the US pardoned a whole lot of those "Doctors" doing chemical weapons testing on chinese in exchange for their empirical data.
Crime paid in their case. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Horizontal Hero

Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 2492 Location: The civilised little bit of China.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't take the Chinese versions on faith either. The Nanjing massacre is one of the prime myths via which the Chinese have developed their self-identity post 1949. Many Chinese here believe that the Japanese killed 50 million Chinese in WW2. Not surprising as the propaganda is on the front pages every second day, with the last set of casualty figures upped a few points higher for maximum effect. I've lived and worked in Taiwan, mainland China and Hong Kong. There is a huge diffeence in the way history is taught in the mainland and the other two places. Needless to say the mainland is full of hate, while the other two have largely moved on. Of course there is a media ban on all atrocities committed by Chinese anywhere/anytime in History. So you get this huge "we are the innocent victims of the evil barbarians" mentality. Mainland chinese could quote data about the Japanese occupation backwards, but would not be able to tell you ANYTHING AT ALL about the million or so very dead Tibetans who died in the "Peaceful Liberation of Tibet."
Another factor is that representations of Japan in the mainland are like a grotesque stereotype to this day. I think many mainalnders see even today's Japanese as blood-thirsty heathens ready to jump the ditch at any time and murder, screw anything that moves and shoot babies in the face. This is the image they are presented with on a regular basis, via the endless historical dramas on TV. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sushi
Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 145
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't that the way they really are though. They are collective to the extreme, and are still capable of being mobilized to do anything in the name of Hirohito or whatever. Navy was the exception I think.
I saw the movie Yamato or Yamoto. Can't remember the spelling. It was an interesting take on the Japanese Navy. Apparently the Imperial Japanese navy were not the barbarians the Japanese army were. They observed the rules of the Geneva convention better than did most Japanese. Was interested in the movie because the Yamato and her sister ship the Musashi were the biggest battleships ever built
I had a Japanese girlfriend, and I used to prod her with questions like "Why did the whole world hate you guys so much", and 'How come everybody hates the Japanese". She just shrugged it off saying "they did it for their country". Left it at that. Never had any major confrontations over it. I think most of the younger set wouldn't give a stuff about what you threw at them about past atrocities. Girlfriend's father was in Kyushu when the Nagasaki bomb was dropped, and he remembers watching the mushroom cloud billowing into the sky.
Last edited by sushi on Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Horizontal Hero

Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 2492 Location: The civilised little bit of China.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually I wasn't aware that people hate the Japanese. Even in Hong Kong and Taiwan many young people idolise the Japanese. It's south korea and mianland China where most of the hate is left - both being intensely hyper-nationalistic. The latter is not a coincidence, I suspect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sushi
Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 145
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
They hate them in the Phillipines too. In Sydney Australia there are many bars that wont allow Japanese, because of the River Kwai incident. Had a Korean friend who when he entered a bar was asked if he was Japanese. He told them no , and that he was Korean, and they let him in. They of course explained why there was a need to know if he was Japanese or not.
I lived in Hawaii for a number of years, and there is a seething dislike for the Japanese. They are called budda heads by the locals. Most of them are very nice on an individual basis, but gezze when they unite everyone else might as well not exist. They close ranks where ever they are in the majority.
They control the medical porofession, the legal profession and it behooves anyone who isn't Japanese from trying to practice their profession in Hawaii who isn't Japanese. They discriminate, but in ways that you can't put your finger on or detect.
Look at Fujimori. A South American by birth, but still an ethnic Japanese. He was still able to go back to Japan to avoid justice( for a while at least), until such a time as the international community put pressure on Koizumi to get rid of him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tue
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Japanese as blood-thirsty heathens ready to jump the ditch at any time and murder, screw anything that moves and shoot babies in the face. |
This is exactly what they did in Nanking. Everyone knows it and accepts it except the Japanese. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tue wrote: |
Quote: |
Japanese as blood-thirsty heathens ready to jump the ditch at any time and murder, screw anything that moves and shoot babies in the face. |
This is exactly what they did in Nanking. Everyone knows it and accepts it except the Japanese. |
Japanese soldiers werent kind enough to shoot people, they just used them for bayonet practice and threw live babies onto bayonets for fun.
My late uncle was a POW in a Prisoner or war camp in Asia during the war though I never heard about his experiences they were treated less than animals at that time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sour Grape
Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
cornishmuppet wrote: |
Is Pearl Harbour any good? |
Utter drivel. Boring as hell, dismal acting and dialogue. Even the scenes of the bombing of Pearl Harbor are uninspiring.
Tora Tora Tora, while old and unspectacular, is a much better film. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|