| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Itsme

Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 624 Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:14 am Post subject: What do you do with the bait and switch? |
|
|
What do you do when a school first offers you 7000 RMB per month then says that 6500 is the MOST that it is allowed to pay by "law" and then adds on to that that 300 to 400 RMB comes out for income tax?
Is any of this legit? The income tax? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would say your being had..first it the deal is 7000 and the switch is 6500 then it is likely someone putting 500 in their pocket as there is no law...
income tax would be based on taking 4800 off as a deductable which would leave a taxable amount ..... As at 2005, an individual's income is taxed progressively at 5% - 45%
at the amount you would make..around 15% |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ymmv
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. Re: A Reduced offer from 7000 to 6500:
It's possible the school isn't really jerking you around - but only if the school in question is a university or college funded (in whole or part) by the Provincial Education Bureau, the PEB may be requiring them to follow the SAFEA "regulations" issued in 2001(guidelines really) for paying foreign experts. Candidates with doctorates and teaching experience topped out at 6500 as I recall. The 2001 guidelines were really just that: guidelines. But it may have been when the school submitted your documents to the PEB for issuance of the letter of invitation, they were told by the PEB that they wouldn't approve a salary in excess of the guidelines (possibly because all or part of the funds for your salary will be coming from the PEB and not the school itself). If that's the case, consider agreeing to the 6500 but for 2 less hours per week. It's a bargain for you (8 less hours for 500 less RMB). If the school really wants you and they're hamstrung by the "guidelines", they'll go along with that. And the PEB will probably issue the letter. They're looking at the RMB number primarily, not the hours.
2. The withholding tax on a 6500 RMB salary WILL BE EXACTLY 145 RMB.
It's very possible that the school has, in the past, never had to pay withholding on a foreign teacher because they had only bachelor degree teachers and never paid more than 4000 (4800 after January 1st this year). If that's the case, the FAO or whomever you were dealing with was probably ball-parking the tax. Have him check with the accounting department to find out the exact amount of tax payable. (The answer he gets will be 145 RMB.)
My source: http://www.ey.com/GLOBAL/content.nsf/China_E/Media_Center_-_News-12-06-2003
(Though the article is from 2003 and before the exemption amount was raised in January of this year, the calculation is the same. Just substitute the current 4800 RMB standard deduction for foreigners, for the 4000 RMB standard deduction which was in effect at the time the article was written. Use the "Non-Gross Up Method - Example 2".)
Example 1 (Gross-Up Method) is only used if you can get the school to agree, as part of your contract, to pay your taxes for you. Actually, if they won't budge on the reduced offer of 6500, you can get some face back (and an additional 145 RMB a month) by accepting their offer of 6500 as after-tax. It's not much, but they'll have to kick in a bit of their own money (the tax) to the 6500 the PEB gives them, but if they really want you, they'll do it. BTW, the tax cost to them of doing it that way, (just so you have the numbers in your head when you negotiate) would be 142.22 RMB. (Method #1). So if the school really wants you, they'll throw an additional 142.22 from their own funds in to pay the taxes.
In the best of all possible scenarios, assuming the school is being on the up and up with you, you get an after-tax salary of 6500 for 12 hours.
Oh, and make sure you add a provision in the contract - if you agree to go with it - that they provide a withholding tax receipt when they pay you on payday every month - whichever way you agree on how the taxes are paid.
Happy negotiating and good luck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WordUp
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ymmv: your tax calculation was based on 2003 data, since January of 2006 the min tax threshold was improved to 4800 RMB..
The tax would be 255 RMB @ 6500 and 375 @ 7,000
6500 - 4800 = 1700 x .15 (15%) = 255 RMB
6500 - 255 = 6,245 RMB
How many periods are you working on this salary and what type of city is it? Large? Medium? Is housing, utils included?
http://journeyeast.org/financial_considerations.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ymmv
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WordUp wrote: |
| ymmv: your tax calculation was based on 2003 data, since January of 2006 the min tax threshold was improved to 4800 RMB.. |
I said that:
"(Though the article is from 2003 and before the exemption amount was raised in January of this year, the calculation is the same. Just substitute the current 4800 RMB standard deduction for foreigners, for the 4000 RMB standard deduction which was in effect at the time the article was written.)"
Point of fact, the 4800 threshold was first reported by me to this board.
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/job/viewtopic.php?p=361181&highlight=#361181
| Quote: |
| The tax would be 255 RMB @ 6500 and 375 @ 7,000 |
Wanna bet?
[/url] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Even though the deductions are the same...the tax laws allow several different methods of calculating and if you have a problem with the method for calculation, it takes a trip to the tax office to have them approve or disapprove the method the company uses...and PSB has no say in salary amounts as it would fall under the Employment and Labor board....that is if the guidelines were regulation...they are not... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ymmv
Joined: 14 Jul 2004 Posts: 387
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cj750 wrote: |
| ...and PSB has no say in salary amounts as it would fall under the Employment and Labor board....that is if the guidelines were regulation...they are not... |
That's right.
Who said the PSB had any say in salary amounts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj750

Joined: 27 Apr 2004 Posts: 3081 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Good then we are in agreement then... no kidding...my mistake.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|