View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:16 pm Post subject: Any teacher trainers out there? |
|
|
I would like to get into teacher training. I have about 5 years experience and halfway done with a Masters.
HOw did you find your jobs?
Any advise for someone who would like to become a trainer? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Contacts and being in the right place at the right time. I've done training on CELTA and DELTA, aswell as in-house stuff. Get to know the people in the know in your area. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Contacts and being in the right place at the right time. |
Me too...experience abroad as well, which you have naturegirl. I'd hooked up with my outfit as they first formed up several years ago. A willingness to commit to a lengthier stay is probably important too, if you're looking at a course provider outside of your home country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jetgirly

Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 741
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As a student, I can tell you that I wouldn't be happy if I enrolled in a course and found that my trainer didn't have either a DELTA (with oodles of experience) or a complete Masters (with lots of experience but not necessarily oodles). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1598 Location: The World is my Oyster
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right place at the right time.
I support the notion of a master's degree AND "oodles of experience."
My experience has been that most programs are both small and employ only a few teacher-trainers, AND have very little turnover [as these jobs are often the best around in terms of flexibility, creativity, and time off - if not always the best wages]. Because of the low turnover - you might need to cultivate contacts and be very patient, and be ready to jump when the opportunity presents itself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I support the notion of a master's degree |
I'd say a DELTA was more important for teacher training. Due to the fact that most training will be at entry level(CELTA) and most efl teachers are not in this business for the long haul. The need ideas and classroom survival skills. They don't need the theory and research skills which most( well, my) MA projects focus on. The DELTA is of more practical value. No? (although it is probably regional specific.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1598 Location: The World is my Oyster
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I'd say a DELTA was more important for teacher training. Due to the fact that most training will be at entry level(CELTA) and most efl teachers are not in this business for the long haul. The need ideas and classroom survival skills. They don't need the theory and research skills which most( well, my) MA projects focus on. The DELTA is of more practical value. No? (although it is probably regional specific.) |
I disagree.
One the biggest issues in training for me - is that the teacher-trainees can get very method-bound. They need some "outside the box" type thinking to deal with all the possibilities of the real world. What happens to PPP or ESA when they encounter their first class of fifty undisciplined students in a loud and hot classroom - at a school that has no books at all and suggests that you just go in and "talk"? This type situation is NOT unusual at all in this part of the world.
I DO fully agree that in four or six weeks one can't teach a full bag of theory - but a deep understanding of how learning occurs - and how to facilitate that learning is important. And DELTA just isn't enough.
You are right - DELTA (and even CELTA) is a regional issue. In Asia, large classes and often the lack of rudimentary facilities require a thinking teacher - not a method-bound instructor.
Uh . . . just my opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tedkarma wrote: |
They need some "outside the box" type thinking to deal with all the possibilities of the real world. |
Do you really think you'd get that from an MA but not a DELTA? I haven't done either, but it seems to me that the DELTA incorporates the practical aspects of "the real world" whereas many MA programs are more theoretical and "ivory tower". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem here is that the DELTA is in Mexico, Brasil and Argentina, I think and they are long courses, about 9 month to a year. Being in Peru, that wouldn't be an option.
But thanks for the info. guess I'll have to be patient. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So if anyone knows of a position in Peru, please let me know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wildchild

Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Puebla 2009 - 2010
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jetgirly,
Are you being paid to promote MA and DELTA programs?
for as you surely know, simply possesing such a qualification does not make one a good teacher trainer.
Degree or no degree, what is important is the ability to help others learn to be a good teacher.
After all, having the MA or DELTA can mean as much as simply having been able to afford the high costs and please the authorities.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jetgirly

Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 741
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, so I'll add that I want an instructor who is qualified (DELTA or MA), has experience (somewhere between lots and oodles) and is a good teacher trainer. Arguing against the values of credentials in a thread about training people to become TESL-qualified seems a little ridiculous. After all, if credentials didn't matter then I suspect most teacher trainers wouldn't have jobs in the first place. And university courses would be taught by chinchillas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tedkarma

Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1598 Location: The World is my Oyster
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I certainly think trainers need both experience and some formal education.
And, it is essential that people considering taking CELTA or TEFL courses take a good hard look at who their trainer(s) might be. I have previously had people go through the course I teach - who were almost immediately offered trainer jobs (at other schools) though they had NO experience at all.
Frankly, I would advocate that all trainers need to have their resumes/CVs online for prospective trainees to review.
Ideal instructor/trainer? At least a couple years experience in each of at least two countries - preferably more (I am not an advocate of "one-country wonders" unless all your trainees will work only in that one country for the rest of their TEFL careers). DELTA or grad education required.
Personally, I have never understood why people want to work in education, want to be considered "educators" - yet deny the value of a good education. Oddly enough, I once worked for a school where the "Academic Director" spoke nastily of someone who had referred to himself as an "educator" - and literally spat out the word "educator" - I was quite surprised as he was the AD where I was working and I certainly considered myself an "educator". I won't go into the details of the argument that followed.
We want our students to work hard - we try to motivate them with the value of the education they are purchasing from our school(s) - but yet some say it just isn't important. Yes, I fully understand all the arguments such as: "I worked with a teacher with a Ph.D. who really s*cked - and I worked with a high school drop out who was great." That's not the point. It is about BELIEVING in the value of education - and your students easily pick that up. You know they do. Whoops! That should have gone on the "philosophy" thread . . . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ted,
I agree with you on every point. A variety of teaching positions would also be helpful, perhaps someone who has been a teacher and a director or coordinator. Then they could tell them what employers look for.
Teacher training is something I also am seriusly considering when i do return to my country of origin. Even with 11 years of reaching experience in 3 countries and a masters and Celta, I still feel there is so much for me to learn about teaching. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coffeedrinker
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not a teacher trainer and I have only a measly CELTA (with a couple years' experience) but I disagree with the line of thinking that any program (a month-long CELTA, a nine-month DELTA, OR a two+ year Master's program) is going to "teach" people to think outside the box.
If they already do "think outside the box" then certainly they can benefit more from a program - and certainly this is a valuable skill for anyone, EFL teacher, teacher trainer, or a variety of other jobs. Experience and education are good things, and I'm not saying they are superflous (?? waiting for further education before I know how to use big words and be certain I'm correct:)), but I think that assuming that someone who has completed a certain program is necessarily thinking or acting a certain way is a symptom of thinking IN the box.
It would be great if there was research that could show a correlation between "amount learned" and "method or qualification of teacher" for EFL, but I think we can all agree that would be nearly impossible. There are SO many factors influencing what students learn, not the least of which are lessons that they are actually motivated to attend and participate in and a positive envirnoment (plus a whole host of things that the teacher has no control over) - most of which are not directly connected to one method of training over another.
Anyway, this may be off topic but I wanted to reply. I guess there is a difference between "what qualifications are in fact often required in the job market" and "what qualifications make a good teacher/teacher trainer." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|