View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
StayingPower
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:57 am Post subject: HESS Not Worth It |
|
|
I don't know, you all, but HESS is not going good for me and it may appear that my 30 day probation period will be a bad review.
I found lots of flaws about HESS. It's overblown, petty, and confounding in its curriculum. Duties placed on workers are far outweighing the time teaching; there's over-scrutinizing, over-observances of workers in class. The expectations overshadow the reasonableness of being an employee, and a teacher, and the contract is calibrated by a parient-orientated drive. There's just so much outside the contract it's almost not worth it.
But I did get my ARC and wonder. If I get the ax, how long is the ARC good for and is it transferrable? Or do I have to go through the whole rigmarole again?
BTW: The blanks are waiting to be filled in. But you can fill them in yourselves if you like.
Last edited by StayingPower on Tue Jan 02, 2007 1:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markholmes

Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 661 Location: Wengehua
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The blanks are waiting to be filled in. But you can fill them in yourselves if you like. |
Sorry, do you mean this to be a copy and paste for every newbie who is having a bad time or do you not want the company name to be revealed?
My best guess is Hess, followed by Kojen, Shane, Jordans & Joy.
Do I win a prize? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
The ARC is semi-transferrable.
What I mean by this is that you can indeed leave your current employer and get a new employer without getting a new ARC, but you would be best off to make these arrangements with the second employer before leaving the first if possible.
Whatever happens you need to make sure that any school you are working for is listed on your ARC in order to be legal. You cannot just get an ARC with one school and then leave them to use that ARC with others. You need the new schools to apply for a seperate work permit which can take a matter of weeks, but your ARC will be cancelled soon after you leave the first school. This is why you need to prepare things in advance.
Respect your contract however and don't do a runner. If you leave your current employer without giving the required notice (at least 30 days preferrably in writing) then you could find yourself blacklisted by the government which will prevent you from ever getting a work permit to teach in Taiwan again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markholmes

Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 661 Location: Wengehua
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was dicussed here a few weeks ago that in order to add that additional school you need the permission of the first school. Is that not correct? And if it is true wouldn't that make this law almost useless? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
StayingPower
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder what this is now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pinkflyd7
Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 49 Location: Austin, TX (previously Taichung City)
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I worked for Hess for over 2 1/2 years. I would advise any newcomers to Taiwan NOT to work for them. Everything the above poster said is true, and more. And from the people that I know that are still working there, it's getting worse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
StayingPower
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
HESS is beyond what both you and I had said. It's almost at the point of being some kind of criminalistic climate for foreigners here, since it's really not honest in its dealings with its workers.
Some will come on here and assuage HESS's heavyhandedness by crying "It's the branch. . ." or "Just like other buxibans. .." This is false. There's something more afoot when it comes to HESS, something almost political.
I just found this to be a non-sensical organization, one that's an abysmal rift of reasoning a human being coming over here to teach will have to traverse.
Moreover, I'm really hoping to have some of those people cross my path, be it CT's, NST's, or Mr. Foo Man Chu, Shoo. They've instigated a sense of racial prejudice I haven't faced in a long time, so I have a little barbarism brewing in me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clark.w.griswald
Joined: 06 Dec 2004 Posts: 2056
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
markholmes wrote: |
It was dicussed here a few weeks ago that in order to add that additional school you need the permission of the first school. Is that not correct? And if it is true wouldn't that make this law almost useless? |
I don't know that there is a clear answer for this.
To my knowledge and this seems borne out by the experiences of those who have been through the process you do not need the permission of your first employer to take on a second legal employer. The second employer just applies for a seperate work permit and you add their name to your ARC.
You are right Mark that there has been some discussion about first employers making it difficult to secure a second employer but I don't believe that it is standard practice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atiff
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
From my experience as well, it can be a bit of a grey area. However, one thing that can make it black & white is if your first employer's contract has a non-competition clause in it that precludes you from working for another school while you work at your first employer.
Also, it is well worth being aware that, if you do go into a second-employer situation and you end your contract with your first employer (so that they cancel your documents), you lose the lot. It is possible to change a second employer over to a "first employer" before that happens, but take extra care (or you may get in trouble for overstaying your visa).
Just a little info.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
timmyjames1976
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not that I work for HESS anymore, or even in Taiwan at the moment, but I would be curious to know how legally binding a "non-competition clause" would be, especially in regards to Taiwanese law. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atiff
Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not a lawyer, but Hess' was written by a Taiwanese lawyer (in Chinese, and then translated into English). It's nothing out of the ordinary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
timmyjames1976
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
atiff wrote: |
I'm not a lawyer, but Hess' was written by a Taiwanese lawyer (in Chinese, and then translated into English). It's nothing out of the ordinary. |
I'm sure that it was. Anyway, does anyone actually have an answer to the question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
StayingPower
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know about you, but this is what happened to me.
HESS told me they'd cancel my ARC. Said I had a week as of the day I was notified. Found out you have two.
Left, came back. Left again, came back, found a job. The new employer got all the documents ready for my work permit/ARC.
Went to immigration, found out my previous ARC had not been cancelled. All along, could've stayed. Got my new ARC, but post-dated to the time my former one ends.
Chicanery? Can I still work here, or is this a non-competition clause, the smirk I saw in my HNST's face?
ACCORDING TO LAW, THEY MUST CANCEL YOUR VISA WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME FRAME, can't forbid you from moving elsewhere, working for others.
I think, therefore, something is extremely wrong with the legal aspect of HESS's dealings, their power-trip-mentality.
And Atiff, I met you, wonder if you aren't but part of that thinking and plan there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
timmyjames1976
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
StayingPower wrote: |
I don't know about you, but this is what happened to me.
HESS told me they'd cancel my ARC. Said I had a week as of the day I was notified. Found out you have two.
Left, came back. Left again, came back, found a job. The new employer got all the documents ready for my work permit/ARC.
Went to immigration, found out my previous ARC had not been cancelled. All along, could've stayed. Got my new ARC, but post-dated to the time my former one ends.
Chicanery? Can I still work here, or is this a non-competition clause, the smirk I saw in my HNST's face?
ACCORDING TO LAW, THEY MUST CANCEL YOUR VISA WITHIN A CERTAIN TIME FRAME, can't forbid you from moving elsewhere, working for others.
I think, therefore, something is extremely wrong with the legal aspect of HESS's dealings, their power-trip-mentality.
And Atiff, I met you, wonder if you aren't but part of that thinking and plan there. |
wow, just...wow
Not at all what I was talking about, but I guess that is my fault for kind of hi-jacking the thread.
Sure HESS does many unethical things (registering your ARC with one school while they have you working at another for one example) but what I was asking was how binding a non-competition clause would be for those who work at one school and want to continue to work there while working elsewhere: especially if the second school has been added to your ARC
doh cant figure this japanese keyboqrd out  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TaoyuanSteve

Joined: 05 Feb 2003 Posts: 1028 Location: Taoyuan
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
timmyjames1976 wrote: |
atiff wrote: |
I'm not a lawyer, but Hess' was written by a Taiwanese lawyer (in Chinese, and then translated into English). It's nothing out of the ordinary. |
I'm sure that it was. Anyway, does anyone actually have an answer to the question. |
I'm not sure anyone will have a definitive answer to that. "Legally binding?" What do you mean exactly? That you would be breaking laws? Probably not. You would be breaking a contract. Most probable, and likely the worst, consequence would be dismissal from employment. This would only happen if the school really wants to sever the relationship with the teacher. They may also be able to sue for damages, but I would think this would be unlikely for various reasons.
Schools don't want you workign for their competition and this kind of language in contracts is mostly there to dissuade you from doing so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|