Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is there really a difference between TEFL and TESL?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dduck



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Posts: 422
Location: In the middle

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:31 pm    Post subject: Is there really a difference between TEFL and TESL? Reply with quote

yaramaz wrote:
I am in an interesting situation in that I am studying Turkish with a Turkish native speaker in Turkey who is normally an English teacher. During my first year here, I taught myself a lot of basic Turkish- vocabulary, a bit of basic grammar, etc. I got thisfrom TV, from books, from listening. However, I felt quite useless when it came to communicating informally-- I could greet my boss and ask for a kilo of apples and other handy things, but I didnt have the core structure to begin creating my own fluent sentences. Hence, I arranged to take lessons with this well respected Turkish English teacher. So far it has been frustrating because I think he's approaching my study of turkish from an 'FL' petrspective rather than 'SL'. Anyone who has taught English in an English speaking country and a non English speaking country will know there is a vast difference in approach and method and goals. He is teaching me Turkish the way that English is taught here- by memorization drills and repitition. I dont want to repeat ten times that Mustafa plays the piano! This is how my students speak English- they can recite irrelevant phrasesand conjugate verbs on paper to high heaven but they cant even say My Name is... I want a list of important, relevant verbs, a list of key words, an example of as many suffixes as possible and how they modify the verbs (in turkish, for example, gitmek means 'to go' and so git is 'go' and can be conjugated using a number of suffixes- ie gidiyorum is the first person present continuous) I want to be given the tools to construct and understand the language on my own-- after all, it is all around me. I can deal with the rest of the learning... I dont want to spend my evenings repeating adnauseum about Ali's inability to swim...


I've started a new thread so the original thread doesn't get distracted by this point.

I believe I'm teaching TEFL, as I'm Mexico teaching English. When I taught English in Scotland, my approach was pretty much the same. The only difference being I was teaching multiple nationalities in the same class. For the life of me I can't think of any other differences! Could some please enlighten me?
Iain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
shirley



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 45
Location: Italy

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:27 pm    Post subject: EFL vs ESL Reply with quote

I think Yaramaz is referring to the problem of relevance. When I lived in Prague my teacher was teaching me to say "Move the piano over there". I realize music is important to Czechs; however, most of us foreigners in the class did not bring our pianos with us but we did need to know how to get a hair cut, etc. The same problem in France, where I learned how to ask for a hotel room but not how to write a check or ask for money from my account or even read the phone book. Beginners studying the local language of the country they live in need survival language. In most ESL programs you can study survival English just to be able to go to the doctor or ask for meat at the butcher. I have yet to find a non-English language country that takes that approach to language teaching. At the academic level there is little difference other than the homogeneity of the language of the learners in EFL. Another difference is ESL teachers teach the "system" as well as the language. For example, when I lived in France I received a letter from the national health insurance office telling me it was time to "update my electronic healthcard". I understood the words and the syntax but I had no idea what it meant or how to do it or where to do it. These types of things are taught by ESL teachers but would not be relevant to an EFL student. I think that's what he or she is referring to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There may not be a difference but there certainly should be. When you're teaching TEFL the classroom is normally the only place where the students are going to be able to practise their English, and may even be the only plaxe they are exposed to English.

On the other hand immigrants are exposed to English all the time in their daily lives. What they need more than practise is an understanding of what the rules are and an explanation of what they are seeing outside. So an ESL lesson ought to be more fomral than an EFL one.

And of course, there is the fact that in an ESL lesson, you often have to do things other than teach English. Cases of students who have never come across electricity before are rare, but there are many other survival skills that you need to teach.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think of TEFL as teaching in a country where English is not the first language.
TESL is teaching where English is the main language,
I think. . . defintiations are always changing . . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
yaramaz



Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 2384
Location: Not where I was before

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I wrote about the difference between ESL and EFL I was referring specifically to relevance for the learner. My students in Canada needed to know how to order a pizza, make a collect call, ask about bus fares or rent an apartment, read a map, understand a menu and what the foods on it were. Also, I found that it was vitally important to give them a solid base to build from early on-- a few vital verbs and their conjugations in several tenses so they could get a quick start to expressing their needs and wishes, as well as a handful of key words and phrases and idioms that would get them off to a good start. Here in Turkey that is not the case. My students learn some songs and talk about how Ali can or cant swim, or who their favourite pop singer is. They can learn simple present this year and simple past next year-- after all, what's the hurry? Both approaches teach English but they are not interchangeable.

My native speaking Turkish teacher is teaching me Turkish the way that he teaches English-- the Ali can/can't swim way. After several lessons from him, I still haven't learned the things I came there for- mainly, key phrases and structures and words that will help me to understand the bus schedules or government forms or what the non English speaking director at the school is saying to me. I want to know the most relevant verbs and adjectives and the suffixes that modify the verbs so that I can start piecing the puzzle together. 'Swimming' is not relevant because I am in the middle of a bloody arid plateau with no swimming pools or lakes around. Sure Ali can swim, but I still dont understand what the form I just signed says...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheryl



Joined: 01 Apr 2003
Posts: 119
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Anyone who has taught English in an English speaking country and a non English speaking country will know there is a vast difference in approach and method and goals.


The way i see it, and totally generally speaking, when you're teaching EFL approaches like asking students to work in larger groups other than 2 or 3 might be difficult due to the large number of students in smaller classrooms. (In canada we tend to have 15-20 students in language classes and in Japan they have on average 40). One might also have trouble finding "authentic" material that is relevant to what's being taught since you'd most likely only have the internet as an "authentic" material resource and thus need to rely on text books. As for goals, i think the other posters have exhausted that issue. Wink ESL and EFL are different, but what makes makes them different are all the little things like the two small points i've mentioned above. I don't think that there is any one definitive answer to the original question...

I've only been in Japan a month so maybe after i've been in the classroom more, my perception of the differences between ESL and EFL may change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dduck



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Posts: 422
Location: In the middle

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks y'all for replying. Smile

yaramaz wrote:
When I wrote about the difference between ESL and EFL I was referring specifically to relevance for the learner. My students in Canada needed to know how to order a pizza, make