|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mark
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 500 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:00 am Post subject: Am I missing something? |
|
|
First off, sorry for yet another contribution to the JET vs. everything debate, but here goes:
As I understand it, the advantages to JET are:
1) higher salary
2) dirt cheap rent
3) lots of free time
The disadvantages are:
1) you're likely to be placed in the countryside, so no Shinjuku for me
Also, given that JETs are well-paid, have low overhead and lots of time for privates, they can save close to the same amount that people typically save in Korea.
So, given all these things, I really can't see the advantages to choosing Nova et al or Korea over JET.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BenJ
Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 209 Location: Nagoya
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
well if I want to work in Japan next month, I can go with Nova. If I am happy to wait a year to apply in my home country, Jet would be better. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
april
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 83 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not going to Japan to make money. I am particular about where I want to live and Geos is giving me what I want, and so did Nova. I also like the freedom of transfering branches and having some say on my schedule. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PAULH
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 4672 Location: Western Japan
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mark,
1. not everyone who applies for the JET program gets accepted on the first try. JET also has an age limit for applicants as well.
Those who get turned down for JET can apply to NOVA or the private schools as a 'consolation' prize.
2. With JET the application process takes about 6-8 months, and you only really get one shot at it. If you miss the deadline or fail the interview you have to try again the next year.
3. The nature of the beast is that with JET you are more or less a speaking assistant to the Japanese classroom teacher, a cultural ambassador or sorts, and your job may require you to work with a captive audience that may have 30 or more students of the same age and level, and a homeroom teacher that may have no real interest in his students becoming communicative in English. For many JET teachers, you are just the 'pet gaijin' for want of a better word. With NOVA at least, you have smaller classes, a greater variety of students and motivated students who want to be there. Its all a question of which style of teaching appeals to you and whether you rise above the 'what's in it for me?' mentality that many JETs have, as though working on the JET program was like some paid vacation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lynn

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 696 Location: in between
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Every JET is different. Some Jets have to make a lot of public appearances. You might have to partcipate in community events, even on Saturdays or National Holidays.
You might be featured in the newspaper shaking the mayor's hand. You might be on the local news.
When my boyfriend came to visit me we just stayed in my apartment the whole weekend, and we entered and existed seperately. There is no rule about having guests in your apartment; there is just a lot of gossip to deal with. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another negative to JET is that after 3 years, you are finished. With NOVA or other jobs in Japan or Korea, that is not the case as long as you get your visa renewed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sherri
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 749 Location: The Big Island, Hawaii
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't apply for JET because I didn't want to teach kids or teenagers. If you prefer teaching adults, JET is not for you. Also I wanted to be in control of my own classroom, not share a class with a regular teacher. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lajzar
Joined: 09 Feb 2003 Posts: 647 Location: Saitama-ken, Japan
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, let's compare my Korea income with my curent Japan income.
Korea: 1.8 million won a month income, saved about 2/3. In GBP, that was 600 a month. Japan: 250 thousand a month income, save about 3/5. In GBP, that is 750 a month. Bear in mind that I am not a big spender. Most people won't be able to save so much.
But, well, Hmm. Difficult decision here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cheryl
Joined: 01 Apr 2003 Posts: 119 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2003 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Its all a question of which style of teaching appeals to you and whether you rise above the 'what's in it for me?' mentality that many JETs have, as though working on the JET program was like some paid vacation. |
I may be wrong but most people who decide to come to Japan on whichever program they chose to teach EFL tend to have a "what's in it for me" mentality.
What set JET apart from the rest of the programs for me was the idea that my purpose for being in Japan was not to teach, but to experience. What i mean is, the other programs such as NOVA or AEON push the teaching and making money side of teaching EFL, where JET pushes internationalization. I know that I could say this more clearly, and I hope you all understand what i'm trying to say. I'm not knocking NOVA or AEON, I'm just saying that the purpose for these different programs for bringing people to Japan is different.
As for the original question, "AM I MISSING SOMETHING?", the answer is, "yes, you are." You're missing the fact that chosing a program to come to Japan with is a personal decision, there is no one BEST program that is good for everyone. If there's anything i've learned by being on this program (JET) is that every situation is different therefore everyone will chose the program that best fits their situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lajzar wrote:
Quote: |
Japan: 250 thousand a month income, save about 3/5. In GBP, that is 750 a month. Bear in mind that I am not a big spender. Most people won't be able to save so much.
|
You save 60% of your income? How do you do that? I'd say you aren't a big spender. You must not have to pay for rent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Celeste
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 814 Location: Fukuoka City, Japan
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What set JET apart from the rest of the programs for me was the idea that my purpose for being in Japan was not to teach, but to experience. What i mean is, the other programs such as NOVA or AEON push the teaching and making money side of teaching EFL, where JET pushes internationalization. |
Well... CLAIR, the government agency responsible for the hiring says that your primary purpose is intenationalization, BUT when you are working for a school, they generally expect you to be focused on teaching and often don't have time in the curriculum for you to "internationalize" their students.
I would recommend that you look at JET as a real teaching job. You will be an assistant language teacher, but the team teachers that you will work with really don't know how to best utilise an assistant. Those who demonstrate classroom competence are left to teach, often with the assistance of the Japanese teachers; those who don't are often treated as human tape recorders because the Japanese teachers don't know what else they can possibly do with them.
I am on the JET programme now, and I love the job. It is great for me, and I have taught kids in Korea and adults in Canada. I think that the more experienced teachers on the JET programme enjoy it more than the absolute newbies who don't really know what they should be doing in the classroom. No one likes to feel superfluous, and if you don't define your role for yourself on the JET programme, no one at your school will do it for you and you'll just find yourself sitting at a desk in the office a lot or sitting in a chair near the blackboard for 7/8 of each lesson, waiting for the teacher to give you a sentence to speak for the students.
e-mail me if you wnat to know more about JET |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 500 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all,
I guess I should clarify something. When I put "lost of free time" as a benefit of JET, I didn't mean I'd have an easy time and have a free vacation.
My main goal in going to Japan is to learn Japanese and mix into the culture as much as I can. I think that it'd be harder to do that teaching back-to-back classes all evening at an eikawa.
Also, I'm a bit worried that teaching at someplace like NOVA would end up being frustrating, though perhaps Aeon or ECC would be better.
I teach adult ESL in Vancouver, and even here I'm frustrated at Japanese students' lack of progress. I've seen students come here as low-intermediates and stay for six months or a year and still not be able to understand native speakers when they go home. They improve, mind you, but they never really learn to listen to stressed English. Many of them come here having no idea that English even is a stress language.
I think it's because schools generally avoid exposing students to English as a stress language and there's often no space in the curriculum for it. Also, since many schools intake weekly, we always have new students in class, and can't really build on anything we taught last week. So, it's difficult to teach this material in class. Also, given the shyness of many Japanese students, they don't go out and find English-speaking friends, so they're not exposed to native speech in that way either. It's funny, I'll ask a Japanese student who's been here for months and months something about Canadians, and the answer will be, "I don't know any Canadians."
So, with big 4 students who really want to learn, it would be frustrating to know that I could give them a couple good listening/speaking books, have them to do the exercises for an hour a day, give them some individual help, and their ability to understand natural spoken English would dramatically improve as the months went by.
The point of all this is that I'm a little worried that teaching in a language mill where students pay a lot for lessons but don't improve as quickly or as much as they otherwise could, would be rather frustrating.
Also, in a HS or Jr HS, most of the staff and students wouldn't really speak English, so I'd be forced to try and use the Japanese that I was learning.
The main downside to JET is that I'd have to wait a long time to go. So, I'm thinking of applying to one of the private ALT agencies. I've heard about the payment problems with Interac, but I think there are other agencies. I hope there are others. I won't have the money to fly over and look for work, so I need to be accepted from overseas.
So, yeah, just a point of clarification. I'm not looking for an easy ride. I'm looking for the best way to learn Japanese and experience the culture. And while I'd prefer to teach adults, I'm not so sure I'd enjoy doing so in an environment where the curriculum limited their ability to really improve. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
april
Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 83 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2003 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The point of all this is that I'm a little worried that teaching in a language mill where students pay a lot for lessons but don't improve as quickly or as much as they otherwise could, would be rather frustrating. |
What other kind of students are you comparing the language mill students to? For people who want to learn a language, or even just take it up as a hobby, what other alternative do they have to joining a language company? (I'm not being a smart arse, I really do want to know if there are alternatives to language companies out there!) If you don't think you would gain job satisfaction from the language companies (which I disagree with), what alternatives do *you* have? An ALT? From what I've heard, it's even more frustrating to be a human tape recorder.
Quote: |
So, with big 4 students who really want to learn, it would be frustrating to know that I could give them a couple good listening/speaking books, have them to do the exercises for an hour a day, give them some individual help, and their ability to understand natural spoken English would dramatically improve as the months went by.
|
I don't understand this sentence. It's frustrating that they would improve dramatically within six months?? Or is this sentence meant to be a conditional and that they would improve if you could give them the materials? I don't know which books exactly you are referring to, but Nova does provide cds with their textbooks; and if you know of better books (which I reckon there would have to be!), you certainly can recommend your students to purchase it.
Quote: |
Also, in a HS or Jr HS, most of the staff and students wouldn't really speak English, so I'd be forced to try and use the Japanese that I was learning. |
You can assured that in Nova not many staff members will speak much English either! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It's funny, I'll ask a Japanese student who's been here for months and months something about Canadians, and the answer will be, "I don't know any Canadians." |
Okay. Come to Japan. After "months and months", I'll knock on your door and ask you how many Japanese you know. If you're honest, you'll say "None."
You may stand a better chance of getting to know Japanese people if you are out in the sticks and there would be a better chance of that as an ALT working for JET in the midst of nowhere. However, if you are an ALT, your students will be kids and will not feature highly on your social list. You may also suffer from "rock star" syndrome if the community is too small.
If you are in a major city you can bet your life you will socialise mostly with gaijin or Japanese who are socialising with gaijin and showing you their western face. THis will be true at least for the first year. AFter that you may learn enough Japanese to branch out but then if you are socialising with foreigners, how are you going to learn Japanese? Vicious cycle.
It takes a long long time to get to know a Japanese person IMHO after being here myself nearly six years. I thought I knew them after a year but two years in I felt like I was back at square one. After three years, things improved dramatically. Now, at 5.5, I'm happy and things are getting deeper by the day.
So, it isn't funny at all to me that after months and months in Canada a Japanese person says they don't know any Canadians.
Japanese people bow for a reason you know (think about it...)  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 500 Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2003 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What other kind of students are you comparing the language mill students to? For people who want to learn a language, or even just take it up as a hobby, what other alternative do they have to joining a language company? (I'm not being a smart arse, I really do want to know if there are alternatives to language companies out there!) If you don't think you would gain job satisfaction from the language companies (which I disagree with), what alternatives do *you* have? An ALT? From what I've heard, it's even more frustrating to be a human tape recorder. |
Well, I was talking about the schools that hire from overseas. I had assumed that there were better, smaller schools in Japan. I've talked to many people who've taught in Japan as well as students who've studied at places like NOVA and nobody seems to be jumping up and down about them.
Quote: |
I don't understand this sentence. It's frustrating that they would improve dramatically within six months?? Or is this sentence meant to be a conditional and that they would improve if you could give them the materials? I don't know which books exactly you are referring to, but Nova does provide cds with their textbooks; and if you know of better books (which I reckon there would have to be!), you certainly can recommend your students to purchase it. |
No, I meant that it would be frustrating that they wouldn't improve as much as they otherwise could. I can only imagine that NOVA wouldn't approve of teachers recommending that students study at home, or privately, with non-NOVA materials.
Quote: |
You can assured that in Nova not many staff members will speak much English either! |
Ah, I was not aware of that.
Quote: |
Okay. Come to Japan. After "months and months", I'll knock on your door and ask you how many Japanese you know. If you're honest, you'll say "None." |
Fair enough. I wasn't trying to trivialise the difficulties in meeting people when in a foreign culture. However, I meant that, compared to students from practically every other country, students from Japan stand out in this category. I've seen students come here for 6 months and never have a conversation with a Canadian except for their teachers (and to order food and that sort of thing, of course). I wasn't talking about their ability to make lifelong friends within a few months. Compared to students from everywhere else, students from Japan tend to remain removed and seem reluctant to engage people although they often lament that they haven't met anyone.
Anyway, the point of my follow-up post wasn't to bash the private schools. I'm not in Japan yet and can only base my thoughts on what I hear from people and read on these boards. I'm under the impression that the materials at ECC and Aeon (and perhaps GEOS) are better than they are at NOVA. However, I obviously can't judge the materials from abroad. All I know is that the students who come here from the big 3 eikawas tend to have poor English, whereas students who come from university or some other school tend to have noticeably better English.
By that I mean that some students come here and can actually understand native speech, i.e. linked, stressed and reduced speech. Those students aren't common, but they never say that they came from one of the big 3.
I'm sure that being an ALT is frustrating too, but if I'm going to be frustrated regardless, I might as well be frustrated in a place that provides a higher standard of living and gives me more free time to pursue my own interests.
Again, I'm making assumptions and some of them are almost certainly wrong. However, I'd hate to end up in a situation where I was being run ragged teaching lots of company-prepared lessons that didn't actually help the students all that much.
Well, how about some questions then. Do students at Nova/Geos/Aeon/ECC actually improve beyond a low-intermediate level through studying at these places? Are they exposed to natural native speech (i.e. not easy-to-understand teacher-talk) and taught how to listen to it? Do people typically get much job satisfaction from the big schools?
Last edited by Mark on Sun Sep 21, 2003 3:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|