View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Margot73
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 145 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 10:16 am Post subject: Any suggestions for teaching past obligation: Had to?? |
|
|
The book has a whole chapter on it. "I had to pay the rent yesterday..." etc. Any ideas for games or other exercises? I have several hours to fill with this.
Last edited by Margot73 on Wed May 16, 2007 10:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dreadnought

Joined: 10 Oct 2003 Posts: 82 Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not really a game as such (more of a task), but introduce the concept of strict/lenient and get the students to do a survey to find out who had the strictest/most lenient parents when they were younger. You know, they can go round the room asking 'did you have to wash up after dinner?' 'did you have to do your homework as soon as you came home?' etc. They can get into groups afterwards, give their decision and explain why ('we think x had the strictest parents because he had to....).
Is this the kind of thing you're looking for? You know, there are quite a lot of books that have decent ideas as well. Try Grammar Practice Activities by Penny Ur. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jr1965
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 175
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like the idea of talking about childhood, as suggested by the poster above. For practice, you could also do a find-someone-who activity in which students create the sentences they'll use in the activity. For example:
Focus on childhood:
Find someone who�
had to go to summer school.
had to wear braces.
had to take care of a younger sibling growing up.
had to make dinner for the family.
And so on.
Students ask, "Did you have to wear braces as a kid?" Reply: "Yeah, I did." Or "Yes, I had to."
Later on, students can each talk in more detail in pairs or groups about something they had to do when they were growing up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Depending on age of students, have them compare what their obligations were in elementary school, junior high, and senior high.
First day on the job (signing forms, meeting certain people, orientation, etc.)
Don't forget to include negatives to practice "didn't have to". Have students do surveys on each other. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kent F. Kruhoeffer

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2129 Location: 中国
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ Hi
I'd begin by comparing should and must.
Both are modal verbs that describe an obligation;
'should' implies a moral obligation, but we have a choice.
'must' often implies a legal obligation or rule; we have no choice.
Next, explain to the students that must = have to
but ...
'must' has no past tense, no future tense and no infinitive;
we use have to instead of must for the past, future & infinitive.
for the past tense, we use had to
for the future tense, we use will or shall have to
not so important, but for the infinitive, we use to have to
From there you can model a few conversations on the whiteboard
and let the students practice asking & answering questions
using all 3 aspects - present, past and future.
i.e,
Do you have to get up early every day of the week?
Yes, ...
No, ...
Did you have to get up early yesterday?
Yes, ...
No, ...
Will you have to get up early tomorrow?
Yes, ...
No, ...
and so on, with variations. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
teacheringreece
Joined: 05 Feb 2005 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
'must' often implies a legal obligation or rule; we have no choice. |
I don't think that's accurate. must is more commonly used for some kind of internal obligation (e.g. I must remember to call my brother). have to is more common for external obligations. But a point that is often missed is that have to is a lot less formal, so you get a lot of overlap in more formal contexts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rusmeister
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why on earth do you have several hours to fill with this? Are your students retarded? Two 20-minute sessions ought to cover it (Max one hour total time over 2-3 lessons). Unless your center is micro-managing and doesn't know what it is doing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chola

Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Posts: 92 Location: the great white north
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 9:49 pm Post subject: had to... |
|
|
You could have the s's talk/write whatever about a trip/vacation somewhere, what were the things they had to do before they left, when they got there. Eg. We had to get immunized, we had to renew our passports, we had to pack our suitcases. You could also get them to talk about past work/school experiences. They could even interview each other. The whole class or groups could brainstorm a bunch of questions together first and then they could pair up....I did something like this a few times and it worked pretty well. Can also use it for the negative form ....didn't have to... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheLongWayHome

Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 1016 Location: San Luis Piojosi
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For god's sake drill the structure to death. If you don't, students will understand when to use it but will come out with, 'I didn't had to go to class yesterday', and other assorted drivel.
If they don't understand the structure of the past simple, you are wasting your time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Margot73
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 145 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rusmeister wrote: |
Why on earth do you have several hours to fill with this? Are your students retarded? Two 20-minute sessions ought to cover it (Max one hour total time over 2-3 lessons). Unless your center is micro-managing and doesn't know what it is doing. |
Well, generally we are supposed to cover one unit in one week. We can do other things not in the book (videos, songs, etc) if they are related to that week's material. There is also a review of the simple past in this unit. Maybe I will come up with more excercise using this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dmb

Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 8397
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
TheLongWayHome wrote: |
For god's sake drill the structure to death. If you don't, students will understand when to use it but will come out with, 'I didn't had to go to class yesterday', and other assorted drivel.
If they don't understand the structure of the past simple, you are wasting your time. |
Doesn't this depend on L1?
(what's a drill?
A device for boring.
sorry old EFL joke) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
(what's a drill?
A device for boring. |
Old, but I hadn't heard it in years- thanks!
In terms of the value of drilling, or how to drill, I recommend Bill Van Patten's book, From Input to Output.
Casts some interesting doubts on the value of "traditional" drills. I believe in drilling form in some circumstances- but too often, it becomes repetition, devoid of meaning. And when it's devoid of meaning, my experience, backed by Mr Van Patten's research, seems to indicate that whatever is learned will not come back in real, meaning based situations.
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dreadnought

Joined: 10 Oct 2003 Posts: 82 Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
teacheringreece wrote: |
Quote: |
'must' often implies a legal obligation or rule; we have no choice. |
I don't think that's accurate. must is more commonly used for some kind of internal obligation (e.g. I must remember to call my brother). have to is more common for external obligations. But a point that is often missed is that have to is a lot less formal, so you get a lot of overlap in more formal contexts. |
Yes, I think you're right, there is a lot of overlap and that's why I'm not always convinced that the internal/external obligation distinction is always terribly helpful for students. I mean, the fact that you have to use 'had to' in the past for 'must' shows that there can't be that much of a distinction.
Actually, reminds me of a lesson I saw once when working as a DoS. The teacher was doing the must/have to distinction, clearly wasn't that well prepared and the students were asking lots of challenging questions, coming up with exceptions etc and the teacher was getting increasingly flustered and frustrated. Eventually, he decided to settle the debate once and for all by giving the definite distinction. In his words: " 'must' is when you have to do something and 'have to' is when you must do something".
Which, as you might imagine, cleared everything up quite nicely.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheLongWayHome

Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 1016 Location: San Luis Piojosi
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Justin Trullinger wrote: |
Casts some interesting doubts on the value of "traditional" drills. I believe in drilling form in some circumstances- but too often, it becomes repetition, devoid of meaning. And when it's devoid of meaning, my experience, backed by Mr Van Patten's research, seems to indicate that whatever is learned will not come back in real, meaning based situations. |
I meant context based drilling, not so much the mindless repetition though mindless repetition is a valid methodology in Mexico - as long as it's within the context of a game. Bring on the edutainment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
basiltherat
Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Posts: 952
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
In his words: " 'must' is when you have to do something and 'have to' is when you must do something". |
excellent.
Reminds me of an old textbook I used many moons ago in which the following explanation (at least along the lines of) was given:
"The present perfect is used when you have done something"
Again, extremely helpful to all.
Thank God things have improved since then.
best
basil  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|