View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Squire22
Joined: 06 Jul 2005 Posts: 68 Location: Shizuoka, Japan
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 12:22 pm Post subject: Using "which" and "who" |
|
|
I have some grammar books, but they don't seem to clearly set out the information I want to know. This is regards the use of these two words, "which" and "who", with regards people in a choice situation.
Am I right in thinking that when you have a choice of two people the question is "Who do you like, John or Paul?" and not "Which do you like, John or Paul?"
In this context I keep thinking that "which" is incorrect because you use it with objects and things as opposed to people. "Which do you like better, apples or oranges?"
Or are they both grammatically correct? I ask because I always hear students using "which", and it just doesn't sound right.
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markle
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 1316 Location: Out of Japan
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:41 pm Post subject: Re: Using "which" and "who" |
|
|
Squire22 wrote: |
I ask because I always hear students using "which", and it just doesn't sound right. |
That's why they're students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DNK
Joined: 22 Jan 2007 Posts: 236 Location: the South
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm no expert, but... (I like giving a crack at these questions)
A. I thought which referred to things/concept words and who directly to people. Which sandwich? Which rental company? Which house? Which person? Who, John or Paul? Who did it? Who likes this stuff?!
B. If you want to get technical (and for conversational purposes this isn't important probably), it would be "WHOM do you like, J or P?" since the "who" isn't the subject of the clause, right?
C. For the record, what would be the term for the "J or P" part of that sentence?
Edit: D. Perhaps you're thinking "Which [person/one] do you like, J or P?" Since it would be easy to imply 'person' or 'one' in that sentence, although it's still a bit odd to be referring to an acquaintance in such an objective manner. "Which [candidate] do you like, John [Kerry] or Paul [Smith]," however, would sound perfectly fine to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JonnyB61

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 216 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DNK wrote: |
B. If you want to get technical (and for conversational purposes this isn't important probably), it would be "WHOM do you like, J or P?" since the "who" isn't the subject of the clause, right? |
Technically this is right but whom as the object pronoun is now so rarely heard in common usage that it is considered obsolete and, to the best of my knowledge, it has been left out of English course books on both sides of the Atlantic. We just don't teach it anymore. It's yesterday's word; it's history; it's toast. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flyingkiwi
Joined: 29 Jan 2007 Posts: 211 Location: In the Golden Gai in Shinjuku, arguing with Mama-san over my tab
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True, it is obsolete, but I love using those Shakespeare words, but have never done it in class or at work. Methinks I would get a few stares. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
According to Michael Swan in Practical English Usage p. 621, "When these words are used as pronouns, without nouns immediately after them, we generally use who, not which, for people."
The examples given are:
"Who won - Smith or Fitzgibbon?" (not "Which won...")
"Who are you going out with - Lesley or Maria?"
But, as DNK says above, you can use which when it is followed by a noun. "Which player is better - Rooney or Johnson?" etc...
You can also use which for classes of people. Swan's example here is "Which is more valuable to society - a politician or a nurse?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Odango
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can't beat a bit of Swan.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuck

Joined: 11 May 2003 Posts: 1921 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
furiousmilksheikali wrote: |
According to Michael Swan in Practical English Usage p. 621, "When these words are used as pronouns, without nouns immediately after them, we generally use who, not which, for people."
The examples given are:
"Who won - Smith or Fitzgibbon?" (not "Which won...")
"Who are you going out with - Lesley or Maria?"
But, as DNK says above, you can use which when it is followed by a noun. "Which player is better - Rooney or Johnson?" etc...
You can also use which for classes of people. Swan's example here is "Which is more valuable to society - a politician or a nurse?" |
Here are some better examples!
Who is this?
Which is more valuable to society - someone who can ride a bicycle without hitting people, or someone who has to ride a Razor scooter because he can't ride a bicycle? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DNK
Joined: 22 Jan 2007 Posts: 236 Location: the South
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, whom is pretty obsolete, but I was thinking it might be needed to be known in an academic context and for reading older material. Of course, for conversation purposes it's useless.
But I'm sure I've been marked by teachers for improper usage on papers. Not sure if kids in Japan need to know about this, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flyingkiwi
Joined: 29 Jan 2007 Posts: 211 Location: In the Golden Gai in Shinjuku, arguing with Mama-san over my tab
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Not sure if kids in Japan need to know about this, though. |
Definitely not. It would confuse them even more then they are now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
DNK wrote: |
If you want to get technical (and for conversational purposes this isn't important probably), it would be "WHOM do you like, J or P?" since the "who" isn't the subject of the clause, right? |
Er, wrong. 'Whom' is an indirect object pronoun; the verb 'to like' is transative, i.e. it takes a direct object. "Who do you like?" is correct. "Whom do you like?" is incorrect.
But apart from that you're basically right DNK.
Last edited by stillnosheep on Wed May 16, 2007 1:28 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
JonnyB61 wrote: |
DNK wrote: |
B. If you want to get technical (and for conversational purposes this isn't important probably), it would be "WHOM do you like, J or P?" since the "who" isn't the subject of the clause, right? |
Technically this is right. |
No it isn't (for the reason previously given).
Last edited by stillnosheep on Wed May 16, 2007 1:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 12:52 am Post subject: Them ol' Shakespeare words, you just gotta luv' em! |
|
|
flyingkiwi wrote: |
True, it is obsolete |
No it isn't. It is merely wrong (please see previous post).
flyingkiwi wrote: |
but I love using those Shakespeare words |
Eh? The adjective is 'Shakespearian'; and 'whom' isn't, particularly.
Last edited by stillnosheep on Wed May 16, 2007 1:06 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 12:57 am Post subject: Ask not for whom the bell tolls... |
|
|
DNK wrote: |
Yeah, whom is pretty obsolete |
No, no, it isn't (please see post subject) and don't be draggged into the by the Philistines!
DNK wrote: |
but I was thinking it might be needed to be known in an academic context. |
Few things are 'needed to be known' (although Baudrillard might disagree), but many language learners could well need to know it.
DNK wrote: |
and for reading older material. |
And not so old. Hemingway for example.
Last edited by stillnosheep on Wed May 16, 2007 1:38 am; edited 9 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 1:01 am Post subject: It tolls for thee. |
|
|
flyingkiwi wrote: |
DNK wrote: |
Not sure if kids in Japan need to know about this, though. |
Definitely not. It would confuse them even more then they are now. |
That might well depend upon how, and by whom, it is taught.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|