|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yawarakaijin
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 504 Location: Middle of Nagano
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:16 pm Post subject: Are the Japanese really so different? |
|
|
I had a really interesting class today that got me to thinking about a couple things.
It's often said..
Don't talk about the war in general with your students
Never talk about Hiroshima, Nagasaki
Never use sarcasm with Japanese, they just dont get it.
Japanese don't like debating, don't try it in class.
etc.
How do you react when you hear these little gems from friends or co-workers? Do you take it as sound advice or do you get the impression that it's a little condescending?
I had a student today who was a very pleasant surprise. He has always been a little shy and reserved, and certainly never interested in any kind of grammar study. (even though he certainly needs it )
Last week, as we were ending the class, it came out that he is quite interested in History so today I tried something a little sneaky. I thought we would talk about interesting historical events using the 3rd conditional.
First came the obligatory eye rolls when I told him that we needed to work on a grammar point and then the epiphany......Hey! I can use this to talk about history. For an hour and a half we had a wonderful discussion on the if's and if nots of world war 2, Japanese history in general and other pivitol moments in history.
So, my questions to you are..
1.) Are these generally sound pieces of advice or simply speculation and generalization?
2.) Are we missing chances to really get to know our students and short changing them intellectually when it comes to conversation and classroom topics?
3.) Is it worth possibly offending a few people in order to make a real connection and have more stimulating conversations than how our weekends went?
note: in no way this meant to be any kind of attack on anyone who may have posted thesee pieces of advice in the past.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Be very careful about trying to sneak history into your English lessons. You may find Chinese or Korean students in your midst, and if the Japanese students are aware of certain aspects of their own history, you might have some bruised egos or mental anguish on your hands. Be kind to everyone.
Japanese don't "not like debating". They do it differently than westerners.
Japanese get sarcasm. Haven't you seen stand-up comedians? Of course, they are being sarcastic in L1 and know how to do it.
Why on earth would you want to talk about the war, Hiroshima, or Nagasaki when there are plenty more topics conducive to practicing English? Please. Give me a good reason that justifies this.
Perhaps we are shortchanging some of the more fluent students, or the ones willing to challenge themselves. But that amounts to about ten percent, in my estimation, based on teaching in university and private high school. The secondary ed kids certainly need as much OC practice as they can get, but the stage that they are in just doesn't usually permit such fluent conversations to develop well. Not with the other stuff they face in their lives (club activities, juku, lack of home life, etc.), and certainly with with the pitiful English skills they are based on from their JTEs.
Go ahead and stimulate and motivate who you can. Most won't appreciate it, so focus on the few who will, but in the end, you still have to teach to the middle of the bell curve, IMO. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Are the Japanese so different?" is a can-of-worms question and loaded with suppressed premises. Different from whom?
There are many people who believe that the Japanese are unique in the world; there is a field of study known as nihonjinron devoted to it. There are foreigners such as the Japanologist Edward Seidensticker who also consider the Japanese to be different from all other people in the world and somewhat hyperbolically sums up his feelings here:
Quote: |
I have recently felt that I might be getting mellow. . . . The Japanese are
just like other people. They work hard to support their---but no. They are
not like everyone else. They are infinitely more clannish, insular,
parochial, and one owes it to one's self-respect to preserve a certain
outrage at the insularity. To have the sense of outrage go dull is to lose
the will to communicate; and that I think is death. So I am going home.
|
Seidensticker is welcome to his opinions but personally I think that the differences are only there because of those who like to hype them up. It has become a self-fulling prophecy that the Japanese who feel that they are part of a unique race have forced others to swallow this idea. There isn't really anything "different" apart from certain salient cultural features.
As for sarcasm, it isn't only Japanese who may not have an understanding of your brand of sarcasm but people outside your circle of friends may not be attuned to the give-away signs.
If you think that the Japanese don't understand irony, a close cousin of sarcasm, then perhaps you should read some Natsume Soseki. It should rid you of the idea that only frying pans beaten across someone's head can ever be funny.
As for talking about the war, I would agree with Glenski that it is best left at the classroom door. I have many Japanese friends who would be willing to engage in such subjects but when it comes to teaching I prefer to keep the subjects non-controversial where possible. If you want to introduce debating language to the classroom then keep the subject at a level that shouldn't get too heated or else play devil's advocate for a ludicrous position to get your students up to speed with the debating format. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yawarakaijin
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 504 Location: Middle of Nagano
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesing points guys. Just to be clear on a few things. It was a private class with a gentleman in his mid 30's. My only direction was let's discuss history using the 3rd conditional. Where the conversation went after that was entirely up to him. It is never something I would introduce directly as a topic to be discussed in , say, a middle school setting.
The examples listed are not specifically things I believe but things I have heard others say.
I find it interesting how many of us get offended when Japanese pull that "oh you cant understand it, you're not Japanese." yet we sit around in bars saying things like "japanese can't understand our humour" or "Japanese don't like to talk about controversial things." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yawarakaijin wrote: |
I find it interesting how many of us get offended when Japanese pull that "oh you cant understand it, you're not Japanese." yet we sit around in bars saying things like "japanese can't understand our humour" or "Japanese don't like to talk about controversial things." |
I know what you mean and my reason for saying that you shouldn't bring controversial subjects into the classroom is not because the Japanese don't like it but because you risk losing the good-will of the clause by exposing everyone's beliefs on such topics. I have seen far too many English teachers blithely tear into Japanese students who have offered opinions but been unable to defend the opinion because they weren't native speakers of English while the English teacher - usually some recently graduated university student - smugly awarded themselves victory and declaring themselves a debating champ. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yawarakaijin
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 504 Location: Middle of Nagano
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I have seen far too many English teachers blithely tear into Japanese students who have offered opinions but been unable to defend the opinion because they weren't native speakers of English while the English teacher - usually some recently graduated university student - smugly awarded themselves victory and declaring themselves a debating champ |
I've seen that a million times as well and it always annoys me. Perhaps the Japanese are quite different. If a Japanese language teacher tried pulling that on a Canadian student of Japanese he would probably end up with a broken nose.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vince
Joined: 05 May 2003 Posts: 559 Location: U.S.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One of the greatest things about living among the Japanese is the gradual process of getting to know them. You're right that the Japanese are no less capable of sarcasm, handling a discussion of the war, and other things that too many foreigners say the Japanese can't do. Often, it's more about how each culture handles the implications of these things. The Japanese are less inclined to use sarcasm, for example, because it can be very cutting and cause someone to lose face; they aren't as thick-skinned about that kind of thing (or we're often insensitive in the Japanese context). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markle
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 1316 Location: Out of Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject: Re: Are the Japanese really so different? |
|
|
Yawarakaijin wrote: |
Don't talk about the war in general with your students
Never talk about Hiroshima, Nagasaki
Never use sarcasm with Japanese, they just dont get it.
Japanese don't like debating, don't try it in class.
|
This kind of advice is good not because of the Japanese people but generally because of the gaijin coming off as belligerant overly opinionated a-holes.
Sarcasm in particular is something that though it is the lowest form of wit, many people who like to use it are bad at it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: Re: Are the Japanese really so different? |
|
|
markle wrote: |
Yawarakaijin wrote: |
Don't talk about the war in general with your students
Never talk about Hiroshima, Nagasaki
Never use sarcasm with Japanese, they just dont get it.
Japanese don't like debating, don't try it in class.
|
This kind of advice is good not because of the Japanese people but generally because of the gaijin coming off as belligerant overly opinionated a-holes.
Sarcasm in particular is something that though it is the lowest form of wit, many people who like to use it are bad at it. |
I agree with markle.
Sarcasm is something that a lot of people like to use and think they are experts at when often it is far too heavy and obvious to be funny. The practitioners of this kind of sarcasm will still say "They don't get the piss-takes". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
southofreality
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 579 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been guilty of using the classroom as my stand-up comedy proving ground, but most of the time the person who enjoyed my jokes the most was me.
In the end, if your goal is to facilitate activities where the desired English is used sucessfully by the students, keeping topics friendly is the best way to go. Sometimes you get lucky and you get students who are comfortable with somewhat controversial material or who will genuinely find your wisecracks funny. But, you've got to pick your spots carefully. If you're unsure how things'll go over in class, it's best to keep it safe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Japanese don't get our humor, or don't understand our sarcasm.
I have many American friends and co-workers who could say the same thing about my own humor and sarcasm. It's silly to say that such lack of understanding is due solely to a race or nationality. I sat around in a bar with a bunch of Brits, and we tried to exchange jokes for an hour. It became clear that our brand of humor just wasn't made for each other, and that was partly due to cultural differences, yes, but we have the same mother tongue!
No harm in bringing up things like WWII?? I had an adult eikaiwa class, where to my surprise Japanese and one Korean some over 50 years old and others in their 30s were astonished to hear one of their classmates (a sharp, friendly businessman in his late 20s early 30s) try to convince everyone that there were no WWII atrocities commited by Japan (or at least that the reports were blown out of proportion). This was a news topics class, and something had been brought to class from The Japan Times, so it was fair game. The outrage that the other students felt was reflected in a (thankfully) polite fashion, but it was obvious that they totally disagreed with the guy. Never saw him again. He quit class. Who knows how such a topic affected him? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vince
Joined: 05 May 2003 Posts: 559 Location: U.S.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
Never saw him again. He quit class. |
This raises a good point. If you teach in a place where it's primarily a business, the staff will likely consider you a liability if they find out that you address these topics. If a student walks out after class and says he's quitting because of the conversation, you could get the short end of the stick regardless of the context of the conversation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gaijinalways
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 2279
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the OP's title is misleading and too general. Many countries consider themselves different, I remember just reading in a novel how some Australians still believe that in their country people are equal (or seen as having a population that doesn't have as much inequality as other countries)
Quote: |
This raises a good point. If you teach in a place where it's primarily a business, the staff will likely consider you a liability if they find out that you address these topics. If a student walks out after class and says he's quitting because of the conversation, you could get the short end of the stick regardless of the context of the conversation. |
Also at univerisities. Student complaints are listened to more now than ever. I try not to give good reasons to the universities I work for to hire someone else to do my job. Being controversial in Japan is not always the best action to take. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alberta605
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 94 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
...(1) Japanese get sarcasm...Why on earth would you want to talk about the war, Hiroshima, or Nagasaki when there are plenty more topics conducive to practicing English? Please. (2) Give me a good reason that justifies this...(3) Go ahead and stimulate and motivate who you can. Most won't appreciate it, so focus on the few who will, (4) but in the end, you still have to teach to the middle of the bell curve, IMO. |
(1) They most certainly do get sarcasm - and they certainly don't like it when its used on them. Many schools, and particularly universities actually stipulate that you may not humiliate the students. Presumably this is very easily done in the face of their lack lustre performances in the classroom (see 3).
(2) A good reason is to challenge the immature responses that may arise from such an objective assessment of national history. In short, if the history of your own country is not fully understood then it is improbable that you will be able to make good decisions in the present day - unless you are astonishingly intuitive of course.
(3) That's very true - I have read surveys passed around various university classes that clearly indicate that students in universities expend energy on trying to do as little work as possible.
(4) Reference to the bell-curve is totally meaningless. It is a static statistical tool as meaningful as investigating the mating habits of butterflies by studying a dead and pinned specimen behind glass. Anyone who thinks that teaching to the middle of the bell-curve is a teaching strategy is ignoring the dynamic and interactive processes that take place in a classroom - totally unquantifiable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alexcase
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 215 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:05 pm Post subject: Different |
|
|
Some things that Japanese people do are more prevalent than in any other country. This is also true in every other country. Most of the things they do exist (with slight variations) in at least one other country. And the reasons why they do what they do are the same all over the world- kindness, boredom, needing to belong, feeling pissed off etc. etc.
As a Brit, I feel much less culture shock in Japan than in Spain. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|