|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lao Wai
Joined: 25 Mar 2006 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:34 pm Post subject: The Value of a BEd. Vs. a TESL Qualification in Asia. |
|
|
Hi there,
Has anyone noticed that educational institutions in Asia often seem to feel that a TEFL qualification and a BEd./PGDE are equivalent to each other? You'll often see job advertisements which state the candidiate must have a BEd. OR a TESL certificate. This really annoys me. While I do feel a TESL certificate can be useful for those teaching ESL, I do not think that it is equal to a BEd./PGDE.
I'm certified to teach in Canada. It is expected by the Department of Education that, if I have ESL students in my class, I will be able to teach them. If necessary, I would have to do my research just as I would do if I had children with ADHD, Autism, etc. In most jurisdictions it would not be expected for me to pay to obtain additional training (i.e. a TESL qualification).
I have a major problem with the PNET Scheme requiring certified teachers to complete a TESL qualification on top of their teaching credentials, on their own time. If you are a decent teacher, your skills should be transferable and you shouldn't need a TESL cert.
If the PNET Scheme wants 'qualified teachers' they should pay them more or offer better incentives. I know there are some variations on the pay scale with regard to teacher qualifications, but they are not significant. One of the differences involves BA teachers being 'capped' at a certain limit on the scale. But really, how many teachers stay in Hong Kong long enough for this to mean anything? Furthermore, an individual who obtains a BEd. usually invests a lot more time and money into that qualification as compared to individuals who only have a TESL cert. (which can often be obtained online).
Personally, I feel the PNET Scheme should drop the requirement for a BEd. altogether. Many of the PNETS I know aren't really using their 'professional knowledge'. Mostly, they are using their experience working with kids and their native language. You don't need to have a BEd. to do this. Perhaps hiring teachers with BA+TESL as teaching assistants would be the better way to go.
Those are my thoughts...anyone care to respond?
Regards,
Lao Wai (a recent leaver of the PNET Scheme)
Last edited by Lao Wai on Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Horizontal Hero

Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 2492 Location: The civilised little bit of China.
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm thinking of getting the damn TESOL cert. One job I applied for (Wall St.) told me I had to do a one week online TEFL course before Icould teach. Another language school in Beijing told me I could only work part-time because I didn't have the TEFL cert. When I pointed out that I had managed to be a head teacher and Director of Studies of an international ESL prgram on my quals, it didn't make any difference. And yeah, I got the B/A (hons), Dip e.d in English teaching - and a PhD . But hey, no TEFL. And that's what really counts for those who lost their frontal lobes in a chainsaw accident. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|