|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:58 am Post subject: Management culture clashes - do these exist? |
|
|
Time and again we hear people complaining about how "badly" their management treat them as teachers. This seems to be common not only in Japan but in many posts in the Asia forum.
I too have have come up against many management policies that seem to me to be completely idiotic. When I challenge them, I feel resistance even when I present what seem like very reasonable arguments for change. Sometimes, I find that there is a very good cultural reason why something is done the way it is. This humbles me and has made me cautious. I've now come to the point where I start to ask myself...
As with different societies and, say eating habits, are there different forms of management in different cultures?
If so, do we, as, say westerners working in Japan or other Asian countries, have a right to complain about how we are managed and demand that we are managed "properly"? In doing this, are we not as guilty of ethnocentrism as the teacher who insists on wearing shoes in their Japanese apartment?
What do you think? Have you had management culture shock and is there a basis for suggesting that when we are "mis"managed, we are in fact simply being managed in a thoroughly legitimate albeit different way from that we expect? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say it depends on the nature of the "mismanagement." If it's a matter of having to do extra paperwork, sit in the office when we're not in class, etc., then I would ask--are those the same conditions that Japanese teachers/employees face? If so, then yes, our whining is a bit ethnocentrist and we need to just deal with "reality" here.
If, however, foreign teachers are not being paid on time, are having their schedules changed with no notice, are being lied to about their contracts, etc., and Japanese teachers/staff are NOT facing those same problems, then I'd say any complaints are justified.
For the record--I have had no management problems in my very short stay here. In fact, they've been excellent, going above and beyond what I would expect/hope for. I am very grateful.
d |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
denise makes some good points. I don't agree with one of them, however. If management changes your schedule with no notice and this is a routine "culturally acceptable" thing, you have no right to wave your own cultural perspective at him and demand that he stop. This is hardly something so culturally specific, however. I know of this instance happening a lot with foreign and non-foreign workers, and everyone is ticked off.
As for the original proposition...
Quote: |
As with different societies and, say eating habits, are there different forms of management in different cultures? |
I would take this as a given and wonder why the question even comes up. (Anyone care to give the Homer Simpson reply of "doh"?)
Quote: |
If so, do we, as, say westerners working in Japan or other Asian countries, have a right to complain about how we are managed and demand that we are managed "properly"? |
Following denise's explanation, I would think that it pretty much answers itself with a resounding NO. The simple phrase "when in Rome..." applies, as far as I'm concerned.
schmooj,
Just what do you define as mismanagement vs. management policies that foreigners disagree with? It seems to me that they fall under different categories. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chinasyndrome

Joined: 17 Mar 2003 Posts: 673 Location: In the clutches of the Red Dragon. Erm...China
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 5:00 am Post subject: Re: Management culture clashes - do these exist? |
|
|
[quote="shmooj"]
Quote: |
I too have have come up against many management policies that seem to me to be completely idiotic. When I challenge them, I feel resistance even when I present what seem like very reasonable arguments for change. Sometimes, I find that there is a very good cultural reason why something is done the way it is. This humbles me and has made me cautious. I've now come to the point where I start to ask myself...
As with different societies and, say eating habits, are there different forms of management in different cultures? |
Management and mismanagement can and do happen even within the same culture and company. There are many sub-styles of management but by and large the three most common are:
1. Pyramid/Christmas Tree: the basic structure of most western business, thinking and behaviour.
2. Trapezoid: the style used by China, still current, and with a flat top (rather than the western pinnacle) that represents the committee approach to chairmanship and general management.
3. Dai maru: the 'big circle' of Japanese management style, which is or was generally inclusive of all workers from the shop floor to the top floor.
There have been several attempts to bring together the 'best' of these styles but with a few exceptions they haven't worked particularly well. The ideas merge well but the people with the ideas often retreat into their own business-culture thinking and actions.
Quote: |
If so, do we, as, say westerners working in Japan or other Asian countries, have a right to complain about how we are managed and demand that we are managed "properly"? In doing this, are we not as guilty of ethnocentrism as the teacher who insists on wearing shoes in their Japanese apartment?
What do you think? Have you had management culture shock and is there a basis for suggesting that when we are "mis"managed, we are in fact simply being managed in a thoroughly legitimate albeit different way from that we expect? |
The world is changing slowly to the general western model, mostly because of the financial powerhouse and its subsequent clout that is the west. However, the west is crawling toward some fundamental changes in its business thinking, especially in the area of business ethics. Enron et al highlighted the lack of ethical fibre in the thread of many companies large and small. Ethics is still usually an elective subject (only taken by 6% of MBA students in USA 2 years ago). A very interesting study was done about this. Generally, the students felt they couldn't afford ethics, would not get or keep the best positions, and felt their primary goal is to make money for the employer.
As with all disciplines, business management needs revision and innovation. For the west this occurred in a major way about 150 years ago with the work of Adams, later revised to help 'level the playing field'. A lot of newish (200-300 years) business thinking actually stems from earlier work by some of the great names of history such as Pythagorus, Galilleo, Damocles and Alexander the Great, to name just a few.
While the western management system is far from perfect, its alternatives have proven over time to be less complete, measurable and repeatable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr.J

Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 304 Location: usually Japan
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
On a survival level, I accept most stupid things. If I didn't I couldn't live here. On a deeper level (not sure what to call it) I question and criticise many things, because whereas some things are just different, many other things are just wrong. It's a constant effort to distinguish the two. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sherri
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 749 Location: The Big Island, Hawaii
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting points made here. I worked as a middle manager (between teachers and the Japanese management). We were mainly in charge of the academic decision-making, while they were making the business-related decisions, but of course there is some over-lap as each has its effect on the other.
I found that the major decision-making was not being made in the meetings where I thought, ideas were being discussed before making a decision. Actually the decision would have already been made and the meeting was to rubber stamp it. I found that to get my ideas properly heard and a chance to get them picked up by senior management was to do what is called in Japanese "nemawashi" or groundwork. So before a meeting, I found that the discussions and decision-making actually took place over lunch and late-night drinking sessions with the Japanese managers. So that is what I did. I didn't try to change the way they worked, anyway I was in the minority and I like a drink after work, it wasn't a hardship for me.
One thing I did try to change to no avail, was to get the Japanese management to make and follow an agenda in a meeting. Very frustrating sometimes! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lajzar
Joined: 09 Feb 2003 Posts: 647 Location: Saitama-ken, Japan
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, if a company dickers with my pay, I get very leery of them very quickly. While the other parts of a contract are nice, that is the core reason for doing any work with them in the first case.
Getting schedule changed on short/little notice also bugs me a lot. One time, a teacher apologetically asked me to reschedule the English class from friday to the next period. I flat out refused (politely of course). It just isnt possible to present a decent lesson without preparation.
Rescheduling someoens work in a factory where there is no brainwork involeved is different though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markosonlines
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 49 Location: Ise
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alternatively, I wonder how the Japanese, or other Asian people, find the western management models. I imagine they may be a little confused in not getting direct answers to their queries, but I'm only speculating.
I found in South Korea my manager would often ask me or one of my colleagues for advice and when we thought her ideas were not so hot we could often get her around to our way of thinking. She was a teacher though, and young, about 32. My current boss has never been a teacher and sometimes it really seems to show. Her management style is, in my opinion, poor and, like Sherri claimed, the management decisions seem to be made beforehand and we have little say in changing anything. When we have tried it has been flatly rejected, no reason given . She tends to recruit young submanagers she can dominate and there is no chance to go out for a drink and discuss it first as it has already happened in her head. We have no input on teaching materials, programs, or what level class a student should join. Currently there is one program we are teaching which I think is complete bollocks, but I don't know how to even begin to suggest we dump it. More likely I will leave first.
However I have found instead of asking management permission for something and getting a flat no, it is sometimes easier just to do it on the sly. Of course there are dangers involved but I am rarely supervised, etc. and so long as everybody is happy........  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 9138
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you emploly foreigners then you must accept some responsability, and that means you learn to accept at least to compromise if not to change some of your own habits.
What I mean is:
- My Chinese overlords simply have to accept that cancelling classes at short notice is not their privilege based on "culture"; it's a bad habit,
full stop!
If I am LATE I am the first to get a dressing-down, and if I cancel classes, ditto! Yet, cancelling classes is so prevalent here that you can say not cancelling a class is the exception (and I include in this phenomenon the irksome last-minute scheduling of inofficial and official holidays).
- CHinese love ad hoc decision making, and they must be aware of how
much we hate them. Sorry, but there is a saying that Christians and Confucians alike are familiar with: "Don't do unto others what you don't want others to do unto you...". Today Yes, tomorrow no, the day after tomorrow it's nyo, and then yen - what's going on? People need stability, business thrives when promises are being kept. Contracts are a Western invention that the Chinese love to respect when they have more staying-power.
- I noticed that some employers resort to using different channels to give you conflicting tidbits of instructions or information. They entrust one person with telling the goods news, another with telling you a slightly or seriously different news, and a thrid person to contradict all previous ones. That's simply not "culture" - that's macchiavellianism!
And, you can't talk direct to the head - you must follow the path scrupulously that leads to one of the go-betweens who in turn has to report to a higher-up until it finally reaches the head. This is convoluted, obviously with the intention of giving maximum freedom of action to the head, while at the same time burdening the wrong people with responsabilities. Again, I question the use of the word "culture" - to me, this is a patriarchal and parochial system fit for a medieval society!
- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Roger wrote: |
If you emploly foreigners then you must accept some responsability, and that means you learn to accept at least to compromise if not to change some of your own habits. |
Honest question: Why?
Roger wrote: |
My Chinese overlords simply have to accept that cancelling classes at short notice is not their privilege based on "culture"; it's a bad habit,
full stop! |
Why do you label this so negatively? Sure, it gets on your wick but isn't this how things are done in China very often?
Roger wrote: |
- CHinese love ad hoc decision making, and they must be aware of how
much we hate them. Sorry, but there is a saying that Christians and Confucians alike are familiar with: "Don't do unto others what you don't want others to do unto you...". Today Yes, tomorrow no, the day after tomorrow it's nyo, and then yen - what's going on? People need stability, business thrives when promises are being kept. |
Why must they be aware? Even so, you make it sound like they do it just to see you get wound up. Perhaps your stability is based in what people say. Perhaps their stability is based in what people are. Therefore the key to business from their perspective is not based in contracts and promises but in people being there and doing things.
Roger wrote: |
- I noticed that some employers resort to using different channels to give you conflicting tidbits of instructions or information. They entrust one person with telling the goods news, another with telling you a slightly or seriously different news, and a thrid person to contradict all previous ones. That's simply not "culture" - that's macchiavellianism! |
Have you been to my school This is an amazing description of what goes on. Such a correlation can't simply be coincidence. There must be a cultural issue here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenski wrote: |
Quote: |
As with different societies and, say eating habits, are there different forms of management in different cultures? |
I would take this as a given and wonder why the question even comes up. (Anyone care to give the Homer Simpson reply of "doh"?) |
If it is a given, as you say, then why are these boards full of us releasing our frustration with it? Obviously, it we are not treating it as a given meaning that somewhere along the line while we live here after ranting around, we have to look in the mirror and say "doh" to ourselves.
Glenski wrote: |
Just what do you define as mismanagement vs. management policies that foreigners disagree with? It seems to me that they fall under different categories. |
I wasn't really heading for a definition. What I was trying to point out was that what might be labelled as mismanagement in our cultures, may be an appropriate management policy here. In such a case, we cannot have a universal definition. Therefore, what we often encounter as we work here is having what we thought was a universal definition challenged. We kick against it initially, arguing from our universal viewpoint only later discovering our ethnocentrism and our naivety.
An example I can think of which blew me away was my company's approach to sick leave. Originally, we were given three days paid sick leave per two year contract. Any more than that and we had to reimburse students who we had to cancel from our own pocket. This is a joke by western standards. I was part of a western staff move to challenge this and, after long debates with our Japanese owners, it was overturned in favour of a much more generous package.
A few months later, the owner confided in me during a private moment that he only got three days sick leave per two years and had to refund students he cancelled where he works. I felt sick as a dog when I realised what we had put him through and how we never even thought to ask what the reason for the original policy was.
Now, I'm not interested in the legalities of all this. Sure, it is quite possibly that Glenski or others can point out that labour law stipulates blah blah blah. The point however is that the westerners ended up successfully dictating policy to the Japanese owner who, because he is a kind and lovely man, eventually bowed to the pressure and went against what most Japanese companies normally do.
Who was doing the right thing in this case? Was there mismanagement? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gordon

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 5309 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So Schmooj, are you saying that we should just accept everything that is given to us and not try to have a more reasonable work environment?
One example in Japan is that most employees are given 2-3 weeks holiday/year. But they usually only take 1 week, so as not to be a liability to their company. In the West, we'd laugh and take every day we're entitled to.
What are you suggesting? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who said I was suggesting anything? I don't have an opinion to tout re this issue. I simply want to discover whether there are ground to posit a Sino/Japanese approach to management which is culturally unique and, if so, get some clarity on what it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sherri
Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Posts: 749 Location: The Big Island, Hawaii
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Last night my (Japanese) husband came home. He was made part of a project team whose function was to make recommendations to the upper management on policy. It turned out to be just a rubber stamp function for decisions that the management had already made. They were all so frustrated. So it is not just the foreigners who don't like this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shmooj

Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 1758 Location: Seoul, ROK
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sherri - thanks for the very interesting insight.
So, what we may have established is that everyone is frustrated by this kind of thing - foreigners and nationals alike. Now, while in the west, such policies would not be tolerated and heads would roll, why here in Japan do such things go on without change?
Perhaps you'll be able to comment on this with your longer experience here and insight through your husband's work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|