Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

EOE, M/F/D/V ???
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Saudi Arabia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Longton



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 148

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:05 am    Post subject: EOE, M/F/D/V ??? Reply with quote

This is from a Booz Allen ad on Dave's:

We are proud of our diverse environment, EOE, M/F/D/V.

I'm trying to work out what this means :

EOE - Equality of Employment?
M - Male
F - Female
D - Disability?
V - Veteran?

They may have a diverse environment in some countries but it certainly isn't diverse in KSA. I wish companies wouldn't use abbreviations when they are not readily understood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will leap in here before 007 appears.

Last edited by scot47 on Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They also fail to mention that they only employ USAnals. They are one of the many in that land who assume that all humans are citizens of that great but flawed Republic.

Last edited by scot47 on Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
007



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 2684
Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scot47 wrote:
They also fail to mention that they only employ USAnals. They are one of the many in that land who assume that all humans are citizens of that great but flawed Republic.

I agree 700% with my Uncle Scot47.

The above great Republic is in trouble with the rest of the world!

Quote:
EOE - Equality of Employment?
M - Male
F - Female
D - Disability?
V - Veteran?

EOE/M/F/D/V Equal Opportunity Employer/Male/Female/Disabled/Veteran (employment)
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/EOE%2FM%2FF%2FD%2FV
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MIKEBUCHAN



Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 106
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:55 pm    Post subject: ? Reply with quote

Can I put my two cents worth in?

I be one of those USAnals! Booz Allen Hamilton is a defence contractor and must, under US law, include all those abbreviations in any and all adverts for employment and quite a few more to comply with the US 'equal opportunities act' that force companies to not discriminate against anyone. However, I believe it just legalizes discrimation.

Anyone know about their operations in Jubal? Salary? Housing?

Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Longton



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 148

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's interesting that Booz Allen doesn't say that the teaching jobs are open for males only. I can understand that for jobs in USA it needs to add that it is an equal opportunity employer but why include this for posts in KSA when females and probably also those with a disability are excluded? I would think it is illegal to state that jobs are open to all when in fact they are not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cleopatra



Joined: 28 Jun 2003
Posts: 3657
Location: Tuamago Archipelago

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I said something similar on the "Public schools" thread.

I don't really understand why employers cannot openly admit that Saudi laws means that many jobs are only open to persons of one gender. Plus, as Longton says, in this particular case, claiming to be an 'equal opportunities' employer seems downright mendacious!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One gender and one nationality. This "Equal Opportiunities" stuff is hogwash ! Empty weasel words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sirens of Cyprus



Joined: 21 Mar 2007
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Booz Allen is a good employer. Flew me to DC for an interview once...business class! They don't pay as much as Raytheon, but still good pay and benefits. Yeah, if they didn't make it clear that you had to be American male, they should have, especially since they ask you to fill out a long application. I assure you it was an oversight, nothing to do with "American arrogance."

But as an American I must have applied for a hundred jobs only to be to told a good way through the recruitment process, "oh, so you're not British?...hmmm....sorry." But I suspect that we often get turned down without even a hint of the reason. I guess they just keep on letting us apply but put us at the bottom of the stack as backups, scratching their head and wondering whether these bloody MA's in ESL from America measure up to CELTA's or DELTA's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too have heard that Boose Allen are good employers but the wording of their ad displays a certain arrogance or naivete. There is a world outside the USofA.

Last edited by scot47 on Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
veiledsentiments



Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 17644
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suspect that they run the same ad everywhere and it has to follow US law. It must include the EOE stuff. The fact that they are hiring for another country is irrelevant to the US legal system. Some places will mention in the ad that the job is for teaching men and hope that most will understand that women need not apply. Some employers have been sued and lost in court because they would not accept applications from women or interview them - even though their foreign contract did not allow women.

Stupid... really... but nothing they can do about it. Some of these employers interview the women without even informing them that they can't be hired. The law needs to be re-written, but don't hold your breath... the US bureaucracy is just as stupid as any other.

VS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ootii



Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 124
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

veiledsentiments wrote:
I suspect that they run the same ad everywhere and it has to follow US law.


Maybe but "Veteran"? They hire Vets of what country, what war? And of what sexual orientation?

It looks more like cut and paste to me. Needing a job advert, the guy plagiarizes another changing only the contact information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cleopatra



Joined: 28 Jun 2003
Posts: 3657
Location: Tuamago Archipelago

PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The fact that they are hiring for another country is irrelevant to the US legal system



My point is that these employers who have these nice 'equal opportunities' ads, still tell you that they only employ men when you apply to them. I know because it's happened to me, more than once. If it is illegal to advertise for jobs which are only open to one gender, surely it is also illegal to hire for them too?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
globalnomad2



Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 562

PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They posted the ad that way because it ran in the US and you simply cannot post discriminatory job ads in the US . They are in fact an equal-opportunity employer in the US. But they don't have to be in countries where equal opportunities are not allowed.

The issue of "veterans" is a nonissue. It refers to people who have served on active duty in the US armed forces, regardless of where they were stationed. They might have been stationed in Hawaii the whole time. It simply means they're not supposed to discriminate against veterans.

If you want to talk about arrogance, Scot, how about the Saudi visa officer in Washington saying to me "I don't know how you could get mixed up in this silly religion." (That was in 1974, when I was a youngster straight out of the Navy; I had been born in a particular religion but it was irrelevant to me as I was/am nonreligious). There's a whole world out there outside the Middle East.


Last edited by globalnomad2 on Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:28 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ootii



Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 124
Location: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cleopatra wrote:
My point is that these employers who have these nice 'equal opportunities' ads, still tell you that they only employ men when you apply to them. I know because it's happened to me, more than once. If it is illegal to advertise for jobs which are only open to one gender, surely it is also illegal to hire for them too?


You're assuming that there is something illegal about saying "men only" or "women only" in job adverts.

Almost all schools in Saudi Arabia are segregated by sex - although there is no actual law requiring it - and men do not normally teach women in the classroom, nor do women teach men. When a man teaches women - or vice versa - they'll often use a closed circuit TV link. I have taught women's classes in Riyadh without this though, actually standing in the classroom like any one else. Again, there is no actual law preventing men from doing this, so far as I know. It is only a convention and an expectation of parents.

I've seen Saudi job adverts that specify "men only", "women only", or "men and women". What is more astonishing is "Saudis preferred" for EFL posts. Still, I do know some very competent Saudi English teachers, and have interviewed a few, but I would not give them automatic first dibs.


Last edited by ootii on Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:32 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Saudi Arabia All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China