|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
imani360
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:10 am Post subject: Hess Is Racist!!! |
|
|
just a quick note to anybody out there bothered by overt corporate racism...
i am a thirty-year-old white guy who has previously worked in taipei. i contacted hess about the possibility of securing employment as an english teacher in taiwan. i sent my photo and got an interview within a week. i was offered a position within eleven days.
i then had my wife - an indian-american born in jersey - send her information to hess, along with her photo. i received an e-mail the next day rescinding the job offer. i wrote and called, attempting to find out what happened, but could get no adequate response.
if this sort of thing bothers you, do not apply to hess. nothing changes if people continue to support this kind of overt racism. other schools in taipei expressed interest in hiring us, and we were able to find employment elsewhere. hess doesn't deserve the kind of respect that it receives from job applicants. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
markholmes

Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 661 Location: Wengehua
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hess isn't 'respected', it is just 'known'. What I mean by that is, it is the biggest school with the advertising budget and therefore more widely known than other schools. Intensive advertising legitimizes a business, so people tend to flock there, regardless of the reputation of the place.
It is something akin to rolling into a small American town after a long day on the road and wanting dinner. You have a choice of the local diner or MacDonalds. The food is probably better at the local diner than at Macdonalds, but you are familiar with MacDonalds, so you eat there. Familiarity breeds confidence.
As for racism, really this is survival of the individual. There is no union of teachers. Teachers come to bitch and moan on Dave's and perhaps find an ear and some common ground with fellow teachers, but in the job market it's pretty much a free for all. People will support you here, but don't expect much support outside this anonymous forum.
Good luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darotker
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone knows that HESS is a low quality Company. The only people who work for them are new people who are too inexperienced to know any better. Alternatively, people with no other choices may go to them. They are a notoriously bad Company in Taiwan with a very poor reputation overall. A large number of their teachers leave during the year and don't fulfill their contracts.
The fact that they rescinded your job offer without explanation isn't surprising at all. Their head office is renowned for a lack of adequate or professional responses to their teachers.
This comes from experience, by the way. I worked there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SEndrigo
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 437
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's funny to hear all this stuff about Hess.
They seem to be the Taiwanese equivalent of Nova (anyone who has been to Japan, and even many who haven't, know about Nova)!
The really funny thing was, you'd see all these people complain about Nova, but they wouldn't really do anything about it. With all the different English schools in Japan, you would think they would just quit Nova and go work somewhere else.
I don't know how it is in Taiwan, but in Japan, once you have a work visa, it's yours.
So you could technically get a 3-year visa with Nova or another school, and quit on the first day, and you would still get to keep your work visa and work elsewhere.
The bottom line is, people who choose to work at Nova and Hess...are making a personal choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CWanders
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
The visa situation is a bit different here. In Taiwan, as in the U.S., work based visas are contingent upon continued employment with the company who filed for your visa.
I recently left Hess. For me, it was more of a financial choice. (I'd lucked out and been placed at a sane language school branch, which I'm well aware is not particularly common.) Going through the visa transfer process is nerve racking. Everyone you talk to from your new employer, to your old employer, to the Department of Labor, all tell you conflicting things about what forms you need and when your resident visa/ARC will be canceled. In the end it worked out alright. But, I know many Hess employees who stick it out for the sake of simplicity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BJ
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Erm, I rarely post but I am finding it increasingly difficult to resist the "experts" on Taiwans education system
Hess is a business, like all businesses its after a profit. Sorry to say these schools are at the whim of the parents. They dont like a teacher they can literally get them fired. That goes all the way up to Universities here.
Racism is the base of most Asian attitudes to anyone not of their race, similar to europe and africa etc etc.
A black teacher will not sit well with many Taiwanese parents, FACT, they DO want the blond haired, blue eyed teacher, or they will accept someone who entertains their child and passes them with an A grade.
Hess is no worse than any other busihban in Taiwan, I have know teachers there for 15 years, some like it, some ahate it, BUT it is a job for which you do get paid.
Thius is NOT the US or Europe, this IS a third world country regardless of the glitz, as such deal with it, find a school you like, stay or go you decide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SanChong
Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 335
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Thius is NOT the US or Europe, this IS a third world country regardless of the glitz, as such deal with it, find a school you like, stay or go you decide. |
Not to hijack this thread from the comments about HESS...
However, Taiwan is most certainly NOT a 3rd world country. Not even close. It's important to be careful with comments like that as they group an entire country into a category which is not at all accurate. Taiwan's economy is well developed, advanced and diverse. The National GDP is higher than countries such as New Zealand, Spain and various other European countries.
Just because Taiwan is different and/or not as wealthy as the US/Canada, certainly does not make it 3rd world.
I'm sorry if it reads like I'm being condescending with these comments. I don't mean them to be. I just feel it's very important to watch your words with those type of comments. Calling a country "3rd world" carries with it a number of general stereotypes, almost all of which do not at all apply to Taiwan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
markholmes

Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 661 Location: Wengehua
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| [Hess] seem to be the Taiwanese equivalent of Nova |
There are certainly comparisons to be drawn. I worked for Nova, got the work permit and left. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BJ
Joined: 03 Dec 2003 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
San Choing, Taiwan is classified as a 2nd world country.
using third is because most people understand the difference.
There are always conectations about words, clarification and remarks about what is and is not would take forever. Whatever one says someone will always jump in with examp-les of differences AND generalizations are the norm, would you care to write an essay on the state of Taiwan in the world league of nations to include living standards/economy/political institutions?
which socio catergory will you use? what class structure? what economic data? etc etc, all are up for discussion.
It also seems this forum is great at picking on people for either spelling/grammer or the nitty gritty explanation of thought.
If you want to say careful? tell me why, point out some facts or you are making a judgemental call on what you perceive others to perceive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blateson
Joined: 12 Mar 2006 Posts: 144
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hess would have been just as racial to you and your white skin as they would have to your non-white wife. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Just because Taiwan is different and/or not as wealthy as the US/Canada, certainly does not make it 3rd world. |
Just because Taiwan may not be a third world contry economically does not mean that it is in other respects such as human rights, corruption, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jotham
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:26 am Post subject: Managers are street smart instead of professional |
|
|
| imani360 wrote: |
| i then had my wife - an indian-american born in jersey - send her information to hess, along with her photo. i received an e-mail the next day rescinding the job offer...if this sort of thing bothers you, do not apply to hess. nothing changes if people continue to support this kind of overt racism. |
I wouldn't go so far as to say racism is involved. You're probably just seeing an overreaction stemming from a cultural tendency of dishonesty � and you unwarily got caught in the middle. Let me explain what I mean by this overreaction on their part to the dishonesty around them, which Westerners might call rampant, and Taiwanese might call normal.
The best way to defend against rampant dishonesty is to be street smart � and this is the case even in upper echelons, where you might ordinarily expect it to be less so. Thus the Taiwanese definition of professional necessarily becomes and is street smart � or a particularly earthy, unsophisticated brand of it. They pride themselves on such talent and eagerly find venues or opportunities to demonstate it to others and thus prove their worth, even if such venues prove to be false, such as your case may be. They value it in the same vein as Westerners value professionalism. It's almost a cheap imitation of it.
In Taiwan, no one can be too street smart. A manager may be (and often is) incompetent or totally nescient about a field relevant to the position (what we call unprofessional), but that's deemed okay (or maybe even preferable) � just as long as an ability is sufficiently demonstrated to cut through the Taiwanese chase and cleverly play the back and forth that entails the BS game. Only then can one be established in the "professional" world and be deemed manager-worthy.
This may be because, from a business perspective, chicanery needs to be regularly dealt with: in Taiwanese society, most people BS each other every day several times a day. And this is all fine, because everyone's doing it, and everyone knows that everyone's doing it, and everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone's doing it. Theirs is the BS society.
But getting BS doesn't necessarily mean getting shafted, in their eyes. (Westerners who don't have a grip on the BS game, on the other hand, may feel shafted for the smallest, inconsequential BS, like being treated in misleading, indirect, or evasive ways just in everyday casual situations.) Since few feel shafted for receiving BS, no one feels guilty for dishing it; in fact, everyone feels permitted or even encouraged to do so. (It's a little like cutting in line.)
Living under this constant mindset, people grow up having a naturally developed aptitude not only for discriminating BS when it's dished, but also for dishing it out so as to survive and authenticate their worthiness to others in society. Here is conventional wisdom: if you get shafted because you were dished out BS and didn't recognize it � that's no one's fault but your own for not having your street-smart faculties polished and well-developed as your BS disher apparently did. Indeed, there's little room for naivety � innocence is no virtue here; it may even be a sin.
One relative area warranting attention is when Taiwanese teachers, to get better pay, pose as American-born Chinese when they aren't. (Perhaps Indians or others have tried as well.) Because of such incidences (and embarassing lapses of BS discernment), Taiwanese managers become ubervigilant and ever ready to manifest their carefully cultivated BS radar in every similar-looking situation (rather than employing careful attention to detail, sophisticated nuance, and ratiocination � in other words, being genuinely smart). Fancying themselves professional and smart (when they're just copy-cat street smart wannabes), they dignify their behavior with, "Come on, I wasn't born yesterday."
This is too bad, because from another aspect, many Taiwanese teachers have an English ability that is very commanding and natural. Unfortunately, managers whose English and general competence is poor will never reward such ability because the ABC label is lacking, which is the only reliable qualifier they heed � since there is little capacity or competence on their part to evaluate suitability otherwise.
I'm guessing in your case, they just thought you were being standard Taiwanese trying to pull the wool over their eyes with some tricky or unusual arrangement they couldn't make heads or tails of � which might suggest in their eyes even a velleity of BS. (They think the whole world operates this way.) No doubt, that manager feels secure and confident that his job was executed professionally as he best knew how � even if you were misunderstood or sleighted: after all, any hint of BS was quickly nipped in the bud. After all, it's better to be street smart to a fault and hurt others than to a deficient degree and hurt yourself.
Given this, the tendency may be for managers to mistakenly judge and reduce the noblest and most professional of people and intents to the managers' more familiar level of commonplace, petty fraudulence. It's not that they reject professionalism; it's that they haven't conceived it yet or had opportunity to be influenced by it given their lifetime environment.
Last edited by jotham on Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:50 pm; edited 81 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jotham
Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 77
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| i wrote and called, attempting to find out what happened, but could get no adequate response. |
I can blame Confucianism for this, which breeds a top-down imperialist system that won't even deign answer a simple, reasonable request by an "inferior" for information, explanation, or justification. And did you try to reason with them? That can be like running into a brick wall. When confronted with reason and nuanced details, the most common reaction I see is deafness and a protuding of the lower jaw in blithe stubborness. Reason and debate come out of Western cultures and are slowly making their way here � but it's a growing process, as democracy is in general. It's no accident that reason, debate, philosophy, and democracy were simultaneously prominent in ancient Greece and they are an important basis of Western society. They are antithetical to imperialism and its attitudes.
One Confucian trait that irritates me in particular and contributes to this pervasive imperialism conveying itself to all sectors and levels is deference to government and government officials. In Confucianist society, these functionaries were the cream of the crop: they had been rigorously tested and the best chosen for prominent positions in government � a system that didn't lead to democratic thinking or excellency in service. Upon entering officialdom, there was little pressure to continue on with genius and innovation to maintain that position, as would be the case for competive businesses in the free market.
In a well-entrenched capitalist society, however, all the geniuses and bright talent flock to vibrant businesses, where salaries are highest. That's the way it should be; and you can witness this in Japan, which has been a democracy for sixty years. Taiwan and Korea are still catching up, with the IT sector leading the way and other sectors still needing to make that rise, like editing and the service sector. This is an important development because competition deriving from capitalism fosters respect for talent, humility in service, and utmost importance on consumers, which we can see demonstrated in the motto "customer is king" � customer is laoban. (In Taiwan, laoban is laoban � and laoban doesn't think she needs to answer to you or anyone like you.)
As it stands, the Taiwanese system still closely resembles the autocratic years, which aren't too far removed. And so there still remains this imperialist attitude at the top, which attitude sets the upper crust as final arbiters that can never make mistakes and that can never be challenged. Considerations of accuracy or objectivity and notions of right or wrong get hastily defenestrated or embarrassingly swept under the rug (and probably so that the BS game � what they've chosen to specialize at � can properly reserve it's place as the order of the day).
I've encountered this imperialism (which is fed by deference) as editor of textbooks that are subject to government approval. The MOE often makes royal edicts concerning English grammar, which ought to be left to us conscientious editors. After all, it isn't their names listed in the textbooks as editor; mine is � as well as other editors'. And we like to be associated with our work. Fearing government retribution, the Taiwanese staff, however, are fine with these dictates and, if left to them, would just accept them � if it weren't for us foreign editors protesting them.
The MOE deigns to concede to us when we quote them sources that prove our positions. But that's backwards: they should be the ones citing authorities when they make their rulings, which is a more humble stance. I haven't had much experience with other government branches, but clearly, I'm not impressed with the MOE.
The MOE has a long history of spitting at the international community in many areas, like turning a blind eye to and even encouraging copyright violations of Hollywood movies on their college intranet � and Coke lawyers were peeved when they learned that the MOE was encouraging improper trademark usage in textbooks by listing Coke on their 2,000 list of English "words" for Taiwanese children to learn. (It's been removed recently). It's symptomatic of imperialism: they're not humble enough to study and research these issues and get them right, instead of violating everyone and stepping on their toes because they're government and thus can ignore the world outside their interests. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|