|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: Women's Rights vs. Zapotec Customs in a Oaxacan Village |
|
|
Melee,
Since the events described in this link appear to take place in your neck of the Oaxacan woods, I'd especially enjoy reading your take on this conflict between Indian customs and women's rights in a Zapotec village.
Here's the link to the article that drew this issue to my attention:
http://my.earthlink.net/article/int?guid=20080127/479c0fd0_3421_13345200801271340957977
Of course, comments from anyone reading this are also welcome! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I should have time after 4pm to give this the thought and consideration it deserves. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Melee. I look forward to reading your reaction to this situation! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately I think Eufrosina Cruz is being used. The Mexican government has long had the policy of wanting to �assimilate� it�s indigenous groups. Usos y Costumbres was a great victory for indigenous rights. And whether Eufrosina was set up, planted, part of the game, or just a unlucky pawn I don�t know, but she�s just what the political establishment has been looking for.
Here�s an article from 2001 that shows that the establishment has been waiting for Eufrosina to appear http://www.letraslibres.com/index.php?art=6733 so that they can weaken indigenous rights in Mexico.
(sorry those of you who don�t read Spanish, most of the links I�m going to provide are in Spanish)
For those who don�t know about �Usos y Costumbres� I recommend you start here
http://www.usosycostumbres.org/
http://www.prodiversitas.bioetica.org/nota26.htm
There is some information available in English, from our friend the narcosphere!
Quote: |
The term �usos y costumbres� refers to a complex of traditional political organization in which the general assembly elects openly and directly the municipal president and other governmental posts without the intervention of political parties. While the system of �usos y costumbres� has existed for centuries, it was normally carried out with the consensus of the ruling PRI party, which would grant an indigenous community a certain amount of autonomy to elect their representatives through the community assembly. Once elected, the representatives were registered as candidates of the PRI. Ballot boxes were stuffed with votes for the PRI and the community officials signed them. This arrangement assured the community an inflow of government funding and enough autonomy to elect its local representatives.
In 1995 the state of Oaxaca modified its constitution to legally recognize the institution of �usos y costumbres� in indigenous communities, legally giving these communities the right to elect their officials in a traditional manner without having to register as candidates of the PRI. This change was due to a long process of indigenous resistance, especially in the Sierra Norte among Zapotecs and Mixes. Although legal and constitutionally recognized, the struggle for autonomy and self-determination continues as electoral violence is still a common phenomenon with political parties (now not just the PRI but the PAN and the PRD as well) struggling for political power by usurping the right of �usos y costumbres.� Many internal problems exist inside the communities as well. Caciquismo (the rule of local political bosses), land disputes and social stratification lead to conflicts in the community, especially during election time. |
from
http://www.narconews.com/Issue42/article1964.html
You can not separate any serious discussion about �usos y costumbres� from the idea of autonomy and self-determination. If we as a society are really ready to embrace the idea that we accept others rights to determine their own laws and social values, then we must also accept the idea that the might want to govern themselves in ways that are appalling to us.
It�s useful to stop and consider that the original definition of the word �tolerance� was �the ability to bear something unpleasant� only recently has it come to be a synonym of acceptance. So to tolerate others differences did not mean that we had to accept or embrace them.
We tend to think of human rights as being universal, but human rights as we know them are really individual rights and there are other ways to organize a society than just to put the importance on the individual. When we talk about society of indigenous Mexican villages, the community is valued over the individual. It can be very hard for �westerners� to tolerate this world view.
Do these communities not have the right to follow their traditions? Do they not have the right to choose the life they want for themselves? Denying women the vote goes against the Mexican constitution, but we are talking about people who were never given a say in the forming of that constitution. They were never given a say as to whether or not they want to be �Mexican�.
Thousands if not millions of indigenous people in Mexico have migrated to the cities and chosen to stay there, to abandon their traditional way of life and become Mexican. But not all of them have. My opinion is when (or if) people are exposed to the greater culture and want to be a part of it, then we extend them a hand and help them and guarantee them the rights we prize. But if they choose NOT to be a part of our system, we have no right to force our precious �rights� on them.
I strongly suggest everyone living in Mexico, especially in Oaxaca read Gustavo Esteva. You don�t have to agree with him, but you should hear his point of view. In my opinion his Mexico�s greatest living philosopher. Here�s an interesting interview with him in English
http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/global/gest_int_3.html This is part 3 of a 4 part piece, the whole thing is interesting, but part 3 is the most relevant to this topic.
In the article you posted Eufrosina said.
"If nothing is done, we'll go on the same way for another century in Quiegolani."
Modern does not equal best. If they want to preserve their traditional life, we should let them. Many people would be proud to be part of a culture that has gone on in the same way for centuries. Obviously, this women does not want to preserve this aspect of her traditions, that is also her right. The challenge is seeing how many of the villagers agree with her (it will be very hard to get them to talk frankly) and how many disagree.
Here are a couple of other news articles (again in Spanish) with a little different spin from the one the AP released..
Recent News Article http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2008/01/19/index.php?section=estados&article=025n2est&partner=rss
http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/notas/473925.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's a very interesting and informative response. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A contentious issue, to say the least. I see a strong parallel in they way westerners view and criticize the use of the Muslim veil, headscarf, or burqa in some Muslim countries. The criticism often put there is that men have decided the rules and enforce the traditions, and that women have little to no say. Further criticism focuses on the violence used to enforce the traditions, and a culture of fear that keeps women from pursuing change. Even Muslim women that express support for such traditions are mocked as having been brainwashed.
In Mexico's case, one would have a hard time completely justifying either position. Women's equality vs indigenous tradition...not necessarily mutually exclusive I think. Beyond the academic argument though, is a concern about what happens to the individual woman when those concepts do clash. It's my opinion that violence is probably a common result, as it has been and continues to be in many societies. To me, that means the issue may become not one of tolerance, but of outrage. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all for the uninitiated, in many Oaxacan villages women are on equal standing as men, own land, make decisions, hold office. In the isthmus there is ever a matriachal society...
Quote: |
To me, that means the issue may become not one of tolerance, but of outrage. |
But my point is, we've no place to be outraged. It's not what I want for myself and my children. But until the majority of the community wants to change, I've simply got to keep out of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GueroPaz
Joined: 07 Sep 2007 Posts: 216 Location: Thailand or Mexico
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was reviewing some Tzotzil grammar today, where the expert bemoans the fact that Mayan languages such as Tzotzil and Tzeltal were almost completely neglected by mestizos throughout Mexican history. Usos y custumbres refer not only to politics or individual rights, but also to community traditions that are far more ancient than most non-Icelandic parliaments. They include grandparents' roles in the community, ejido land sharing, decision making, early marriage, dowries, child-rearing, crop tillage, cooking, clothing - most of which would be buried in white bread, sugar coated, mestizo-ized bastardizations of Western 'civilization.'
It still blows my mind to recall the 14 year old married couples whose normal six-year 'educaci�n' was interrupted after about 3 years, by a 1994 revolution which has not ended. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carolync
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 38 Location: Phoenix, Az
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who's to say what the majority of the woman in these communities want? If they are being married off at age 12 with no education they probably have no idea that there's an alternative. I agree that change has to come from within the society, not from westerners pushing their veiws. But with no rights or education, how can these woman make an informed decision about how they want to live their lives? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carolync wrote: |
But with no rights or education, how can these woman make an informed decision about how they want to live their lives? |
So what's your solution?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carolync wrote: |
But with no rights or education, how can these woman make an informed decision about how they want to live their lives? |
The women in question, who started this discussion is an accountant.
The fact of life is many many of the people in these villages (and again, it's worth noting that there is a lot of diversity among the villages, Quiegolani which is Chontal, not Zapotec, is not the norm) have left their traditions behind, and immigrated to the US or to Mexicans cities. I think you won't find people who don't know about the outside world. I imagine from my experiences in other small villages that at least one home in Quiegolani has satalitte TV.
But just as we can look at them and say, "I don't want to have any part in your society." We have to concede them the same opportunity to look at us and say "We don't want to have any part in your society". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thelmadatter
Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 1212 Location: in el Distrito Federal x fin!
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:55 pm Post subject: segregation |
|
|
Whether or not the federal government has wanted someone like Eufrosina Cruz to appear is irrelevant. She is a member of that community and is raising the question of whether the notion of �Usos y Costumbres� should trump the rights of women to be equal in status to men... a right upheld by Mexican law as well various UN documents. This question must be addressed.
Under a strong interpretation of Usos y Costumbres and the idea expressed by MELEE as
Quote: |
But just as we can look at them and say, "I don't want to have any part in your society." We have to concede them the same opportunity to look at us and say "We don't want to have any part in your society". |
, just because a community has oppressed a subgroup historically, no outsider has the right to intervene.
However, such total segregation is simply not possible. First of all, didnt various peoples in the world, fight AGAINST segregation because "separate but equal" just simply didnt work? Secondly, as it was admitted, Oaxacans of various communities DO become part of "our" community by traveling to work... so they choose to be part of the larger society. Do the men of Quiegolani vote in state and federal elections? If so, they ARE part of larger Mexican society by exercising their MEXICAN rights. With rights come trade-offs. They may not have had a part in creating the Mexican Constitution, but they are a part of that current system, and have no problem using a system they obstensibly didnt create to gain advantages for themselves... the menfolk, I mean.
If this thinking had been applied 100 or so years ago, women still would not have the vote in most Western countries.
Another problem I have with such segregationist thinking is that the proponents of such seem to have this idyllic idea of keeping certain communities (but not other) as kind of museum pieces... No country, community or culture exists in a vacuum and without change. That is reality.
However, I propose a solution... have a referendum among the women of Quiegolani by secret ballot to see if they really want to be deprived of the rights that men have simply because they dont "work hard enough". However, I would also venture to bet that if the majority voted to be equals with men, apologists would claim these women were somehow "brainwashed" by "foreigners" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm really pleased that my post has generated such thoughtful and diverse replies. Once I've finished with a rush translation job that I'm in the middle of, I'll chime in with my reaction to this discussion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MELEE

Joined: 22 Jan 2003 Posts: 2583 Location: The Mexican Hinterland
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: Re: segregation |
|
|
thelmadatter wrote: |
However, I would also venture to bet that if the majority voted to be equals with men, apologists would claim these women were somehow "brainwashed" by "foreigners" |
I don't think anyone would say that. And I think giving women equal rights is what they should do but they haven't come to ask my advice on the situation, and I still think it is not my place to go and give them advice they have not asked for. I'd go farther and say the men should also vote in secret ballot. If you read the two other news stories I linked to (El Universal y La Jornada) you'd see it apears she does/did have the support of some of the males in her village. I do see change in these villages. I have faith in their humanity. I perfer to let them make the changes they want, on their own time. And not be outraged. They would be just as justified at being outraged by many things in the dominate culture's society, mine. So I pefer to throw no stones. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MELEE wrote: |
First of all for the uninitiated, in many Oaxacan villages women are on equal standing as men, own land, make decisions, hold office. In the isthmus there is ever a matriachal society... |
I am aware that in the Isthmus the Zapotec society is a matriarchal one, with the women holding a great deal of power, especially economic power. That's why I was surprised to learn of how patriarchal the society is in the village under discussion. I wonder if any men living in matriarchal villages in the Isthmus have ever thought to challenge the way things are the way Eufrosina Cruz has in Quiegolani. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|