View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
obinhwan
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:39 pm Post subject: Phrasal verb/Grammar problem |
|
|
Hello all,
A student of mine asked me a question about the use of a phrasal verb, and I couldn't for the life of me give him a straight answer. If anybody can help me with this, I'd really appreciate it, as I told my student I would try and figure this out for him.
"The metaphor puts across the idea well."
The phrasal verb being "puts across."
Why is it incorrect to substitute "the idea" with the pronoun "it?"
So, "The metaphor puts across it well."
All I could tell him was because it doesn't sound right. I figured there has to be some kind of grammatical reason, but I can't come up with it. Can anybody help me out with this?
Thanks,
B |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_K
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 2041 Location: A World of my Own
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately, this is one area of English grammar where it's imposible to give rules. Some phrasal verbs are separable, others not. You just kinda have to know! Your answer was about right.
However you could say, "The metaphor puts it across well"... which proves my point.
Also, Switch the light off
Switch it off
but not:
Switch off it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
obinhwan
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thx Phil,
The problem wasn't in determining if the phrasal verb was separable or not, (in this case separable) but rather why the pronoun "it" can't be subbed in for "the idea." I'm wondering if I should just stick with "Because it doesn't make sense." I'm sure that will be followed by a big fat "but why?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The metaphor puts it across well.
Only if you have already established that you are referring to "the idea"; and with any context, for native speakers at least, this would be inferred
"puts it across" and "puts across it" are both grammatically correct with different meaning
With concrete objects this is more concrete
Do you think
"The metaphor puts the idea across well"
and
"The metaphor puts across the idea well"
have the same meaning? Are both correct?
are puts across and put____ across both
1) phrasal verbs ?
2) with equal meaning ?
Last edited by arioch36 on Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_K
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 2041 Location: A World of my Own
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"puts it across" and "puts across it" are both grammatically correct with different meaning |
Can you give an example for "puts across it"... I can't!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Can you give an example for "puts across it"... I can't!! |
Aha!
so is "The metaphor puts across the idea" truly correct? Or is it incorrect, but so common that we give no thought to it, and accept it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He puts across it a large blanket
definitely not the same meaning as
He puts it across a large blanket |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_K
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 2041 Location: A World of my Own
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, it is generally accepted as acceptable (!) as in my example of switching of the light. But then language is a fluid animal, so we are venturing into the area where even advanced grammaticians (or is that grammarians? ) can't agree. A little like economists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phil_K
Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 2041 Location: A World of my Own
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arioch36 wrote: |
He puts across it a large blanket
definitely not the same meaning as
He puts it across a large blanket |
Not the same thing. We are talking about pronoun substitution. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MO39

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Posts: 1970 Location: El ombligo de la Rep�blica Mexicana
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phil_K wrote: |
Unfortunately, this is one area of English grammar where it's imposible to give rules. Some phrasal verbs are separable, others not. You just kinda have to know! Your answer was about right.
However you could say, "The metaphor puts it across well"... which proves my point.
Also, Switch the light off
Switch it off
but not:
Switch off it. |
Grammar books should have a chapter or two in which the use of two-part (aka phrasal) verbs is explained, along with a list of which verbs are separable and which ones aren't: for example, put on is and wait for isn't.
With separable two-parters, when the object is a pronoun, it must go between the two parts of the verb phrase: I put them on. If it is a noun or noun phrase, it can go between or at the end: I put on my shoes or I put my shoes on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, obviously somewhere along the line "put across" has gained additional meaning, to make something known, to tell people something.
I wonder how?
Have to get John Slat to research that one  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2007
Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 349 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi guys,
Quote: |
Unfortunately, this is one area of English grammar where it's imposible to give rules. Some phrasal verbs are separable, others not. You just kinda have to know! Your answer was about right. |
I've always understood that it depends on the original use of the verb. For example:
'He put his hat on' - Here the direct object is 'his hat', that's what he 'put'. The 'on' would originally mean 'on his head', with the 'his head' being dropped because it's obvious. In cases like this the phrasal verb tends to be separable.
However, in some cases the object mentioned is related to the preposition, rather than being the direct object of the verb. Example:
'I'm slowly getting over this cold' - Here I'm getting 'myself' over the cold. The object, 'the cold' is part of the prepositional phrase 'over the cold' and therefore it doesn't make sense to separate the verb. 'I got the cold over' is clearly wrong.
However, in some contexts, the phrasal verb 'to get over' can be, and indeed must be, separated. Example:
'He regularly gets his leg over' - Here it's the leg that is the direct object (as in the first example) which he claims to be able to get over certain people (the implied noun of the prepositional phrase). Obviously, in this case, separating is required because 'He can't get over his leg' would be misinterpreted. 'He can't get over the loss of his leg' would be perfectly acceptable though, the context being clear.
When using a pronoun with a phrasal verb the rule seems to be to separate if it's a separable verb. So in the first example 'He put it on' would be correct but in the second 'he got over it' is clearly the right form. The third, 'he got it over' would also be acceptable in context, but with a different meaning to the second.
Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2007
Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 349 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry if it seems I'm repeating what others have just said, nobody had answered when I started writing my post  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
obinhwan
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe, thx guys, this both helps and hurts, the pain being the headache I feel coming on.
Now even if "the idea" is already established, I still don't see "puts across it" as being correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arioch36
Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 3589
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Not the same thing. We are talking about pronoun substitution. |
That's my gist. Not grammatically incorrect in of itself, just doesn't fit the situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|